The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones
Artickle deals with the evaluation of growth dynamics of selected set of clones Lonicera kamtschatica in the conditions of Nitra. We measured the growth of the shrubs twice a year (in spring and autumn) during 2003–2005. Within all clones 5 shrubs were evaluated. On the basis of the obtained results...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Mendel University Press
2007-01-01
|
| Series: | Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://acta.mendelu.cz/55/2/0053/ |
| _version_ | 1818063993626951680 |
|---|---|
| author | Ján Matuškovič Tünde Pokorná–Juríková |
| author_facet | Ján Matuškovič Tünde Pokorná–Juríková |
| author_sort | Ján Matuškovič |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Artickle deals with the evaluation of growth dynamics of selected set of clones Lonicera kamtschatica in the conditions of Nitra. We measured the growth of the shrubs twice a year (in spring and autumn) during 2003–2005. Within all clones 5 shrubs were evaluated. On the basis of the obtained results we can claim the highest increase of height in case of LKL 21 followed by clones LKL 16 and LKL 5. The lowest growth increase was typical for LKL 58 and LKL 66.In term of statistical evaluation the year can be considered as a statistically significant factor forming a growth intensity of clones during 2003–2005. The effect of year on growing processes is strong (ε2 = 0.96) while the participation of year with clone influenced the growth increase in medium size (ε2 = 0.42). LKL 21 and LKL 58 in comparison with other clones are the most disperatable in term of growth increase. Within mentioned clones statistically significant differences were recorded in 7 evaluated pairs. In the same way LKL 42 is very different from another clones as well. On the basis of all provided analysis the tested clones from point of wiev perspectivity of planting can be set up in the following order: LKL 21, LKL 16, LKL 5, LKL 42, LKL 49, LKL 96, LKL 6, LKL 60, LKL 66 and LKL 58. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T14:28:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-10839d7ac19c48b2b44775ee467706f2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1211-8516 2464-8310 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T14:28:56Z |
| publishDate | 2007-01-01 |
| publisher | Mendel University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis |
| spelling | doaj.art-10839d7ac19c48b2b44775ee467706f22022-12-22T01:44:59ZengMendel University PressActa Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis1211-85162464-83102007-01-01552535810.11118/actaun200755020053The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clonesJán Matuškovič0Tünde Pokorná–Juríková1Katedra ovocinárstva, vinohradníctva a vinárstva, Slovenská poľnohospodárska univerzita, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovenská republikaKatedra odborových didaktík, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa, Nábrežie mládeže 91, 949 74 Nitra, Slovenská republikaArtickle deals with the evaluation of growth dynamics of selected set of clones Lonicera kamtschatica in the conditions of Nitra. We measured the growth of the shrubs twice a year (in spring and autumn) during 2003–2005. Within all clones 5 shrubs were evaluated. On the basis of the obtained results we can claim the highest increase of height in case of LKL 21 followed by clones LKL 16 and LKL 5. The lowest growth increase was typical for LKL 58 and LKL 66.In term of statistical evaluation the year can be considered as a statistically significant factor forming a growth intensity of clones during 2003–2005. The effect of year on growing processes is strong (ε2 = 0.96) while the participation of year with clone influenced the growth increase in medium size (ε2 = 0.42). LKL 21 and LKL 58 in comparison with other clones are the most disperatable in term of growth increase. Within mentioned clones statistically significant differences were recorded in 7 evaluated pairs. In the same way LKL 42 is very different from another clones as well. On the basis of all provided analysis the tested clones from point of wiev perspectivity of planting can be set up in the following order: LKL 21, LKL 16, LKL 5, LKL 42, LKL 49, LKL 96, LKL 6, LKL 60, LKL 66 and LKL 58.https://acta.mendelu.cz/55/2/0053/<i>Lonicera kamtschatica</i>clonesgrowth dynamicsyearrepeatings |
| spellingShingle | Ján Matuškovič Tünde Pokorná–Juríková The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis <i>Lonicera kamtschatica</i> clones growth dynamics year repeatings |
| title | The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones |
| title_full | The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones |
| title_fullStr | The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones |
| title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones |
| title_short | The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones |
| title_sort | evaluation of growth dynamics of lonicera kamtschatica clones |
| topic | <i>Lonicera kamtschatica</i> clones growth dynamics year repeatings |
| url | https://acta.mendelu.cz/55/2/0053/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT janmatuskovic theevaluationofgrowthdynamicsoflonicerakamtschaticaclones AT tundepokornajurikova theevaluationofgrowthdynamicsoflonicerakamtschaticaclones AT janmatuskovic evaluationofgrowthdynamicsoflonicerakamtschaticaclones AT tundepokornajurikova evaluationofgrowthdynamicsoflonicerakamtschaticaclones |