Effect of three different preparation designs on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restoration fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic material: An in-vitro comparative study

Objectives: Marginal adaptation is considered one of the key factors influencing the success of indirect restorations. This study aimed to estimate the marginal fit of lithium disilicate overlays with three distinct preparation designs before and after cementation. Methods: Thirty maxillary first pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sajad Athab Hasan, Zainab Mohammed-Hussain Abdul-Ameer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-05-01
Series:Saudi Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905223000640
_version_ 1797823747085828096
author Sajad Athab Hasan
Zainab Mohammed-Hussain Abdul-Ameer
author_facet Sajad Athab Hasan
Zainab Mohammed-Hussain Abdul-Ameer
author_sort Sajad Athab Hasan
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: Marginal adaptation is considered one of the key factors influencing the success of indirect restorations. This study aimed to estimate the marginal fit of lithium disilicate overlays with three distinct preparation designs before and after cementation. Methods: Thirty maxillary first premolars were divided into the hollow chamfer design (HCD11 HCD: Hollow Chamfer Design.) group, butt-joint design (BJD22 BJD: Butt-Joint Design.) group, and conventional occlusal box design (COD33 COD: Conventional Occlusal Design.) group (n = 10 each). The samples were scanned using an intra-oral scanner, and overlays were fabricated using computer-assisted design and milled on a computer-assisted machine. The finished restorations were luted using a self-adhesive resin RelyX Ultimate. The marginal gap was assessed using a digital microscope with 230X magnification power. Statistical analysis was conducted using analysis of variance and post hoc (Bonferroni correction) tests, assuming a significance level of 5%. Results: The HCD and BJD groups recorded significantly lower marginal gap, (11.39 ± 0.72, 16.29 ± 0.75) and (11.59 ± 0.75, 16.93 ± 0.65) respectively, than the COD group (24.57 ± 1.18, 34.45 ± 1.09) both pre- and post-cementation. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that modification of tooth preparation plays a significant role in the marginal adaptation of the lithium disilicate overlays. The gap was smaller with the HCD and BJD than with the COD, with a statistically significant difference.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:28:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1092cebf5fc44df886236d6bd960dbae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1013-9052
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:28:32Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Saudi Dental Journal
spelling doaj.art-1092cebf5fc44df886236d6bd960dbae2023-05-19T04:45:00ZengElsevierSaudi Dental Journal1013-90522023-05-01354372377Effect of three different preparation designs on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restoration fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic material: An in-vitro comparative studySajad Athab Hasan0Zainab Mohammed-Hussain Abdul-Ameer1Corresponding author at: Aesthetic and Restorative Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Altibbi Collection, Bab Al Muadham, Zip Code 10049-10047, Al Rusafa, Baghdad, Iraq.; Aesthetic and Restorative Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, IraqAesthetic and Restorative Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, IraqObjectives: Marginal adaptation is considered one of the key factors influencing the success of indirect restorations. This study aimed to estimate the marginal fit of lithium disilicate overlays with three distinct preparation designs before and after cementation. Methods: Thirty maxillary first premolars were divided into the hollow chamfer design (HCD11 HCD: Hollow Chamfer Design.) group, butt-joint design (BJD22 BJD: Butt-Joint Design.) group, and conventional occlusal box design (COD33 COD: Conventional Occlusal Design.) group (n = 10 each). The samples were scanned using an intra-oral scanner, and overlays were fabricated using computer-assisted design and milled on a computer-assisted machine. The finished restorations were luted using a self-adhesive resin RelyX Ultimate. The marginal gap was assessed using a digital microscope with 230X magnification power. Statistical analysis was conducted using analysis of variance and post hoc (Bonferroni correction) tests, assuming a significance level of 5%. Results: The HCD and BJD groups recorded significantly lower marginal gap, (11.39 ± 0.72, 16.29 ± 0.75) and (11.59 ± 0.75, 16.93 ± 0.65) respectively, than the COD group (24.57 ± 1.18, 34.45 ± 1.09) both pre- and post-cementation. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that modification of tooth preparation plays a significant role in the marginal adaptation of the lithium disilicate overlays. The gap was smaller with the HCD and BJD than with the COD, with a statistically significant difference.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905223000640Butt jointHollow chamferMarginal adaptationOcclusal box designOverlay
spellingShingle Sajad Athab Hasan
Zainab Mohammed-Hussain Abdul-Ameer
Effect of three different preparation designs on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restoration fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic material: An in-vitro comparative study
Saudi Dental Journal
Butt joint
Hollow chamfer
Marginal adaptation
Occlusal box design
Overlay
title Effect of three different preparation designs on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restoration fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic material: An in-vitro comparative study
title_full Effect of three different preparation designs on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restoration fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic material: An in-vitro comparative study
title_fullStr Effect of three different preparation designs on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restoration fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic material: An in-vitro comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of three different preparation designs on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restoration fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic material: An in-vitro comparative study
title_short Effect of three different preparation designs on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restoration fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic material: An in-vitro comparative study
title_sort effect of three different preparation designs on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restoration fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic material an in vitro comparative study
topic Butt joint
Hollow chamfer
Marginal adaptation
Occlusal box design
Overlay
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905223000640
work_keys_str_mv AT sajadathabhasan effectofthreedifferentpreparationdesignsonthemarginaladaptationofindirectoverlayrestorationfabricatedfromlithiumdisilicateceramicmaterialaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT zainabmohammedhussainabdulameer effectofthreedifferentpreparationdesignsonthemarginaladaptationofindirectoverlayrestorationfabricatedfromlithiumdisilicateceramicmaterialaninvitrocomparativestudy