Optimal reimplantation timing in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: an observative cohort study in Asian population

Abstract Background The optimal timing for reimplantation for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has not been established and varies from a few weeks to several months. The aim of this study was to assess the commendable time between implant removal and reimplantation in patients who underwent two...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meng-Lun Tsai, Allen Herng-Shouh Hsu, Cheng-Ta Wu, Po-Chun Lin, Timothy L Tan, Feng-Chih Kuo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-01-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07129-8
_version_ 1797363712819986432
author Meng-Lun Tsai
Allen Herng-Shouh Hsu
Cheng-Ta Wu
Po-Chun Lin
Timothy L Tan
Feng-Chih Kuo
author_facet Meng-Lun Tsai
Allen Herng-Shouh Hsu
Cheng-Ta Wu
Po-Chun Lin
Timothy L Tan
Feng-Chih Kuo
author_sort Meng-Lun Tsai
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The optimal timing for reimplantation for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has not been established and varies from a few weeks to several months. The aim of this study was to assess the commendable time between implant removal and reimplantation in patients who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 361 patients who were treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee chronic PJI at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, surgical variables, microbiology data, and time to reimplantation were recorded. All patients were followed for a minimum of one year. Treatment failure was defined by Delphi criteria. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate survival rates and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of treatment failure. Results In final analysis, 27 (7.5%) had treatment failure. Factors related to treatment failure including interim spacer exchange (OR, 3.13; confidence interval (CI), 1.04–9.09, p = 0.036), higher ESR level at reimplantation (OR, 1.85; CI, 1.05–3.57; p = 0.04), and time to reimplantation (OR, 1.00; CI, 1.003–1.005, p = 0.04). Performing revision arthroplasty surgery from 16 to 20 weeks had highest successful rate. The reimplantation over 24 weeks had a lower successful rate. However, no statistical significance in comparing each interval group. Conclusion Our study emphasized the importance of timely reimplantation in achieving successful outcomes. Factors such as ESR levels, spacer exchange, and the duration of time to reimplantation influenced the likelihood of treatment failure in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee PJI.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T16:25:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-10947379eb844b34ad7f1f94efe6186a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T16:25:06Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-10947379eb844b34ad7f1f94efe6186a2024-01-07T12:04:31ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742024-01-012511810.1186/s12891-023-07129-8Optimal reimplantation timing in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: an observative cohort study in Asian populationMeng-Lun Tsai0Allen Herng-Shouh Hsu1Cheng-Ta Wu2Po-Chun Lin3Timothy L Tan4Feng-Chih Kuo5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San FranciscoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial HospitalAbstract Background The optimal timing for reimplantation for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has not been established and varies from a few weeks to several months. The aim of this study was to assess the commendable time between implant removal and reimplantation in patients who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 361 patients who were treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee chronic PJI at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, surgical variables, microbiology data, and time to reimplantation were recorded. All patients were followed for a minimum of one year. Treatment failure was defined by Delphi criteria. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate survival rates and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of treatment failure. Results In final analysis, 27 (7.5%) had treatment failure. Factors related to treatment failure including interim spacer exchange (OR, 3.13; confidence interval (CI), 1.04–9.09, p = 0.036), higher ESR level at reimplantation (OR, 1.85; CI, 1.05–3.57; p = 0.04), and time to reimplantation (OR, 1.00; CI, 1.003–1.005, p = 0.04). Performing revision arthroplasty surgery from 16 to 20 weeks had highest successful rate. The reimplantation over 24 weeks had a lower successful rate. However, no statistical significance in comparing each interval group. Conclusion Our study emphasized the importance of timely reimplantation in achieving successful outcomes. Factors such as ESR levels, spacer exchange, and the duration of time to reimplantation influenced the likelihood of treatment failure in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee PJI.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07129-8ReimplantationPeriprosthetic joint InfectionTiming of reimplantationTime to reimplantAsianExchange arthroplasty
spellingShingle Meng-Lun Tsai
Allen Herng-Shouh Hsu
Cheng-Ta Wu
Po-Chun Lin
Timothy L Tan
Feng-Chih Kuo
Optimal reimplantation timing in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: an observative cohort study in Asian population
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Reimplantation
Periprosthetic joint Infection
Timing of reimplantation
Time to reimplant
Asian
Exchange arthroplasty
title Optimal reimplantation timing in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: an observative cohort study in Asian population
title_full Optimal reimplantation timing in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: an observative cohort study in Asian population
title_fullStr Optimal reimplantation timing in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: an observative cohort study in Asian population
title_full_unstemmed Optimal reimplantation timing in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: an observative cohort study in Asian population
title_short Optimal reimplantation timing in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: an observative cohort study in Asian population
title_sort optimal reimplantation timing in two stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection an observative cohort study in asian population
topic Reimplantation
Periprosthetic joint Infection
Timing of reimplantation
Time to reimplant
Asian
Exchange arthroplasty
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07129-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mengluntsai optimalreimplantationtimingintwostageexchangeforperiprostheticjointinfectionanobservativecohortstudyinasianpopulation
AT allenherngshouhhsu optimalreimplantationtimingintwostageexchangeforperiprostheticjointinfectionanobservativecohortstudyinasianpopulation
AT chengtawu optimalreimplantationtimingintwostageexchangeforperiprostheticjointinfectionanobservativecohortstudyinasianpopulation
AT pochunlin optimalreimplantationtimingintwostageexchangeforperiprostheticjointinfectionanobservativecohortstudyinasianpopulation
AT timothyltan optimalreimplantationtimingintwostageexchangeforperiprostheticjointinfectionanobservativecohortstudyinasianpopulation
AT fengchihkuo optimalreimplantationtimingintwostageexchangeforperiprostheticjointinfectionanobservativecohortstudyinasianpopulation