Why Legal Reasoning has to be Unique

This article addresses the issue of the uniqueness of legal reasoning and, specifically, the author advances the thesis that what makes legal reasoning different from the reasoning  employed in demonstrative and empirical sciences and matters of everyday life is not the actual form (scheme) of this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maciej Koszowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Law and Administration of the Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań 2017-09-01
Series:Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ppuam/article/view/12278
_version_ 1797839916096290816
author Maciej Koszowski
author_facet Maciej Koszowski
author_sort Maciej Koszowski
collection DOAJ
description This article addresses the issue of the uniqueness of legal reasoning and, specifically, the author advances the thesis that what makes legal reasoning different from the reasoning  employed in demonstrative and empirical sciences and matters of everyday life is not the actual form (scheme) of this reasoning but the legal milieu. Thus, he tries to demonstrate that some features of law – such as its normative and prescriptive nature, difficulties with the verification of its content on empirical grounds, its limitations stemming from the physical world and dependence on humans and their minds, as well as the ‘unspecialized’ character of law agents and the extraordinary role of authority – influence legal reasoning as well. At the same time these features also allow this reasoning to be unique, despite its adoption of forms of inference that are present elsewhere.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:04:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-10a89ea077cd433094f45ea7e7ff2bb3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2083-9782
2450-0976
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:04:47Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Law and Administration of the Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań
record_format Article
series Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza
spelling doaj.art-10a89ea077cd433094f45ea7e7ff2bb32023-04-25T06:41:56ZengAdam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Law and Administration of the Adam Mickiewicz University PoznańPrzegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza2083-97822450-09762017-09-01710.14746/ppuam.2017.7.20Why Legal Reasoning has to be UniqueMaciej Koszowski0Łazarski University in Warsaw, Faculty of Law and Administration, Świeradowska 43, 02–662 Warszawa, Republic of Poland This article addresses the issue of the uniqueness of legal reasoning and, specifically, the author advances the thesis that what makes legal reasoning different from the reasoning  employed in demonstrative and empirical sciences and matters of everyday life is not the actual form (scheme) of this reasoning but the legal milieu. Thus, he tries to demonstrate that some features of law – such as its normative and prescriptive nature, difficulties with the verification of its content on empirical grounds, its limitations stemming from the physical world and dependence on humans and their minds, as well as the ‘unspecialized’ character of law agents and the extraordinary role of authority – influence legal reasoning as well. At the same time these features also allow this reasoning to be unique, despite its adoption of forms of inference that are present elsewhere. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ppuam/article/view/12278lawlegallawyersreasonreasoningthinking
spellingShingle Maciej Koszowski
Why Legal Reasoning has to be Unique
Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza
law
legal
lawyers
reason
reasoning
thinking
title Why Legal Reasoning has to be Unique
title_full Why Legal Reasoning has to be Unique
title_fullStr Why Legal Reasoning has to be Unique
title_full_unstemmed Why Legal Reasoning has to be Unique
title_short Why Legal Reasoning has to be Unique
title_sort why legal reasoning has to be unique
topic law
legal
lawyers
reason
reasoning
thinking
url https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ppuam/article/view/12278
work_keys_str_mv AT maciejkoszowski whylegalreasoninghastobeunique