In Vitro Comparison of Surgical Implant Placement Accuracy Using Guides Fabricated by Three Different Additive Technologies
Various three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies are commercially available on the market, but the influence of different technologies on the accuracy of implant-guided surgery is unclear. Thus, three printing technologies: Stereolithographic (SLA), Digital light processing (DLP), and Polyjet we...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-11-01
|
| Series: | Applied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7791 |
| _version_ | 1797548856274059264 |
|---|---|
| author | Chuchai Anunmana Chananchida Ueawitthayasuporn Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen Prakan Thanasrisuebwong |
| author_facet | Chuchai Anunmana Chananchida Ueawitthayasuporn Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen Prakan Thanasrisuebwong |
| author_sort | Chuchai Anunmana |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Various three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies are commercially available on the market, but the influence of different technologies on the accuracy of implant-guided surgery is unclear. Thus, three printing technologies: Stereolithographic (SLA), Digital light processing (DLP), and Polyjet were evaluated in this study. An entire 30 polyurethane models replicated the clinical situation. Ten surgical guides were printed by SLA, DLP, and PolyJet. Then, implant-guided surgery was performed, and their accuracy outcomes were measured concerning angular deviation, 3D deviation at the entry point, and apex. On top of that, the total processing time was also compared. For the angular deviation, the mean deviation was not statistically significant among all technologies. For the 3D deviation, PolyJet was statistically more accurate than DLP (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and SLA (<i>p</i> = 0.017) at the entry point. PolyJet was also statistically more accurate than DLP (<i>p</i> = 0.007) in regards to 3D deviation at the apex. Within the limitation of this study, the deviations from the experiment showed that PolyJet had the best outcome regarding the 3D deviations at the entry point and at the apex, meanwhile, the DLP printer had the shortest processing time. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T15:06:44Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-10a9d1258f43402aa20fbbebfa565f96 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2076-3417 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T15:06:44Z |
| publishDate | 2020-11-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Applied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-10a9d1258f43402aa20fbbebfa565f962023-11-20T19:40:01ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-11-011021779110.3390/app10217791In Vitro Comparison of Surgical Implant Placement Accuracy Using Guides Fabricated by Three Different Additive TechnologiesChuchai Anunmana0Chananchida Ueawitthayasuporn1Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen2Prakan Thanasrisuebwong3Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, ThailandMaster of Science Program in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, ThailandDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, ThailandDental Implant Center, Dental Hospital, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, ThailandVarious three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies are commercially available on the market, but the influence of different technologies on the accuracy of implant-guided surgery is unclear. Thus, three printing technologies: Stereolithographic (SLA), Digital light processing (DLP), and Polyjet were evaluated in this study. An entire 30 polyurethane models replicated the clinical situation. Ten surgical guides were printed by SLA, DLP, and PolyJet. Then, implant-guided surgery was performed, and their accuracy outcomes were measured concerning angular deviation, 3D deviation at the entry point, and apex. On top of that, the total processing time was also compared. For the angular deviation, the mean deviation was not statistically significant among all technologies. For the 3D deviation, PolyJet was statistically more accurate than DLP (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and SLA (<i>p</i> = 0.017) at the entry point. PolyJet was also statistically more accurate than DLP (<i>p</i> = 0.007) in regards to 3D deviation at the apex. Within the limitation of this study, the deviations from the experiment showed that PolyJet had the best outcome regarding the 3D deviations at the entry point and at the apex, meanwhile, the DLP printer had the shortest processing time.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7791guided implant surgerysurgical guide3D printing technology3D printercomputer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)accuracy |
| spellingShingle | Chuchai Anunmana Chananchida Ueawitthayasuporn Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen Prakan Thanasrisuebwong In Vitro Comparison of Surgical Implant Placement Accuracy Using Guides Fabricated by Three Different Additive Technologies Applied Sciences guided implant surgery surgical guide 3D printing technology 3D printer computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) accuracy |
| title | In Vitro Comparison of Surgical Implant Placement Accuracy Using Guides Fabricated by Three Different Additive Technologies |
| title_full | In Vitro Comparison of Surgical Implant Placement Accuracy Using Guides Fabricated by Three Different Additive Technologies |
| title_fullStr | In Vitro Comparison of Surgical Implant Placement Accuracy Using Guides Fabricated by Three Different Additive Technologies |
| title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro Comparison of Surgical Implant Placement Accuracy Using Guides Fabricated by Three Different Additive Technologies |
| title_short | In Vitro Comparison of Surgical Implant Placement Accuracy Using Guides Fabricated by Three Different Additive Technologies |
| title_sort | in vitro comparison of surgical implant placement accuracy using guides fabricated by three different additive technologies |
| topic | guided implant surgery surgical guide 3D printing technology 3D printer computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) accuracy |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7791 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chuchaianunmana invitrocomparisonofsurgicalimplantplacementaccuracyusingguidesfabricatedbythreedifferentadditivetechnologies AT chananchidaueawitthayasuporn invitrocomparisonofsurgicalimplantplacementaccuracyusingguidesfabricatedbythreedifferentadditivetechnologies AT sirichaikiattavorncharoen invitrocomparisonofsurgicalimplantplacementaccuracyusingguidesfabricatedbythreedifferentadditivetechnologies AT prakanthanasrisuebwong invitrocomparisonofsurgicalimplantplacementaccuracyusingguidesfabricatedbythreedifferentadditivetechnologies |