Comparative analysis of craniotomy methods in severe traumatic brain injury

The goal of research: to improve the results of neurosurgical management in patients with traumatic brain compression by detecting an optimal way of craniotomy.Material and methods. The study includes data of 127 patients with traumatic brain compression. The series consisted of 109 (85.8...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keneshbek B. Yrysov, Mitalip M. Mamytov, Bakytbek J. Turganbaev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute 2020-12-01
Series:Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal
Online Access:https://theunj.org/article/view/214218
_version_ 1797350784652804096
author Keneshbek B. Yrysov
Mitalip M. Mamytov
Bakytbek J. Turganbaev
author_facet Keneshbek B. Yrysov
Mitalip M. Mamytov
Bakytbek J. Turganbaev
author_sort Keneshbek B. Yrysov
collection DOAJ
description The goal of research: to improve the results of neurosurgical management in patients with traumatic brain compression by detecting an optimal way of craniotomy.Material and methods. The study includes data of 127 patients with traumatic brain compression. The series consisted of 109 (85.8 %) males and 18 (14.2 %) females out of examined. The patients’ age ranged from 16 to 85 years. The neurosurgical interventions were performed in all patients with traumatic brain compression.Results. The patients with traumatic brain compression regardless of craniotomy method (burr hole surgery, craniectomy, osteoplastic craniotomy) did not experience a statistically significant difference in the outcome. When planning a method of craniotomy in traumatic brain compressio, the grade of consciousness impairment on the Glasgow coma scale, brain contusion foci, acute subdural and intracerebral hematomas, brain compression, patients’ age and brain dislocation syndrome should be considered that predicts an outcome.Conclusion. The results of a burr hole, resection, and osteoplastic craniotomy revealed no significant differences in outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. Resection craniotomy in traumatic brain injury may be effective enough even in deep coma and dislocation syndrome but in absence of intraoperative brain edema. The absence of brain edema, the moderate coma level are indications for osteoplastic craniotomy.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T12:50:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-10ac934f4ab54ed1868c67049ee2155e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2663-9084
2663-9092
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T12:50:04Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute
record_format Article
series Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal
spelling doaj.art-10ac934f4ab54ed1868c67049ee2155e2024-01-20T09:13:03ZengRomodanov Neurosurgery InstituteUkrainian Neurosurgical Journal2663-90842663-90922020-12-01264354110.25305/unj.214218Comparative analysis of craniotomy methods in severe traumatic brain injuryKeneshbek B. Yrysov0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5876-4976Mitalip M. Mamytov1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0586-9480Bakytbek J. Turganbaev2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0172-1849I. K. Akhunbaev Kyrgyz State Medical Academy, Bishkek, KyrgyzstanI. K. Akhunbaev Kyrgyz State Medical Academy, Bishkek, KyrgyzstanI. K. Akhunbaev Kyrgyz State Medical Academy, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan The goal of research: to improve the results of neurosurgical management in patients with traumatic brain compression by detecting an optimal way of craniotomy.Material and methods. The study includes data of 127 patients with traumatic brain compression. The series consisted of 109 (85.8 %) males and 18 (14.2 %) females out of examined. The patients’ age ranged from 16 to 85 years. The neurosurgical interventions were performed in all patients with traumatic brain compression.Results. The patients with traumatic brain compression regardless of craniotomy method (burr hole surgery, craniectomy, osteoplastic craniotomy) did not experience a statistically significant difference in the outcome. When planning a method of craniotomy in traumatic brain compressio, the grade of consciousness impairment on the Glasgow coma scale, brain contusion foci, acute subdural and intracerebral hematomas, brain compression, patients’ age and brain dislocation syndrome should be considered that predicts an outcome.Conclusion. The results of a burr hole, resection, and osteoplastic craniotomy revealed no significant differences in outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. Resection craniotomy in traumatic brain injury may be effective enough even in deep coma and dislocation syndrome but in absence of intraoperative brain edema. The absence of brain edema, the moderate coma level are indications for osteoplastic craniotomy.https://theunj.org/article/view/214218
spellingShingle Keneshbek B. Yrysov
Mitalip M. Mamytov
Bakytbek J. Turganbaev
Comparative analysis of craniotomy methods in severe traumatic brain injury
Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal
title Comparative analysis of craniotomy methods in severe traumatic brain injury
title_full Comparative analysis of craniotomy methods in severe traumatic brain injury
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of craniotomy methods in severe traumatic brain injury
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of craniotomy methods in severe traumatic brain injury
title_short Comparative analysis of craniotomy methods in severe traumatic brain injury
title_sort comparative analysis of craniotomy methods in severe traumatic brain injury
url https://theunj.org/article/view/214218
work_keys_str_mv AT keneshbekbyrysov comparativeanalysisofcraniotomymethodsinseveretraumaticbraininjury
AT mitalipmmamytov comparativeanalysisofcraniotomymethodsinseveretraumaticbraininjury
AT bakytbekjturganbaev comparativeanalysisofcraniotomymethodsinseveretraumaticbraininjury