Beyond Oil on Canvas: New Media and Presentation Formats Challenge International Copyright Law’s Ability to Protect the Interests of the Contemporary Artist

Current copyright laws in all jurisdictions are lacking explicit provisions for protecting many types of contemporary art. It remains unclear to what extent ideas should be copyrightable as art, if at all; or whether an artwork’s commercial nature provides a decisive factor regarding appropriation....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Molly Ann Torsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh 2006-03-01
Series:SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society
Online Access:http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/script-ed/vol3-1/torsen.asp
_version_ 1811280825302384640
author Molly Ann Torsen
author_facet Molly Ann Torsen
author_sort Molly Ann Torsen
collection DOAJ
description Current copyright laws in all jurisdictions are lacking explicit provisions for protecting many types of contemporary art. It remains unclear to what extent ideas should be copyrightable as art, if at all; or whether an artwork’s commercial nature provides a decisive factor regarding appropriation. Certain situations seem plainly inappropriate, such as artists needing to seek legal counsel in conjunction with creating their artwork: inappropriate in its financial extravagance and in its inevitable curb on creativity. As such, it is incumbent upon courts and legislatures to analyze the issue and to provide guidance. It is the author’s finding that strong moral rights and a vibrant public domain are not necessarily at odds with each other, especially when parties are open to communication. Laws operate to provide structure when parties do not make other arrangements amongst themselves; contracts between artists and galleries, artists and publishers, even artists and other artists may provide the highest degree of satisfaction for specific parties to a specific situation. Not surprisingly, parties with legal or business interests in art and parties with artistic interests in art would communicate better if they understood each other’s situations. Hopefully the issues will continue to be the focus of some thought on all platforms such that informed legal decisions can be made and artists can pursue and protect their creative productions, no matter their format.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T01:21:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-10bddafe76514980b2d73644304972db
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1744-2567
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T01:21:45Z
publishDate 2006-03-01
publisher University of Edinburgh
record_format Article
series SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society
spelling doaj.art-10bddafe76514980b2d73644304972db2022-12-22T03:08:45ZengUniversity of EdinburghSCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society1744-25672006-03-01314570Beyond Oil on Canvas: New Media and Presentation Formats Challenge International Copyright Law’s Ability to Protect the Interests of the Contemporary ArtistMolly Ann TorsenCurrent copyright laws in all jurisdictions are lacking explicit provisions for protecting many types of contemporary art. It remains unclear to what extent ideas should be copyrightable as art, if at all; or whether an artwork’s commercial nature provides a decisive factor regarding appropriation. Certain situations seem plainly inappropriate, such as artists needing to seek legal counsel in conjunction with creating their artwork: inappropriate in its financial extravagance and in its inevitable curb on creativity. As such, it is incumbent upon courts and legislatures to analyze the issue and to provide guidance. It is the author’s finding that strong moral rights and a vibrant public domain are not necessarily at odds with each other, especially when parties are open to communication. Laws operate to provide structure when parties do not make other arrangements amongst themselves; contracts between artists and galleries, artists and publishers, even artists and other artists may provide the highest degree of satisfaction for specific parties to a specific situation. Not surprisingly, parties with legal or business interests in art and parties with artistic interests in art would communicate better if they understood each other’s situations. Hopefully the issues will continue to be the focus of some thought on all platforms such that informed legal decisions can be made and artists can pursue and protect their creative productions, no matter their format.http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/script-ed/vol3-1/torsen.asp
spellingShingle Molly Ann Torsen
Beyond Oil on Canvas: New Media and Presentation Formats Challenge International Copyright Law’s Ability to Protect the Interests of the Contemporary Artist
SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society
title Beyond Oil on Canvas: New Media and Presentation Formats Challenge International Copyright Law’s Ability to Protect the Interests of the Contemporary Artist
title_full Beyond Oil on Canvas: New Media and Presentation Formats Challenge International Copyright Law’s Ability to Protect the Interests of the Contemporary Artist
title_fullStr Beyond Oil on Canvas: New Media and Presentation Formats Challenge International Copyright Law’s Ability to Protect the Interests of the Contemporary Artist
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Oil on Canvas: New Media and Presentation Formats Challenge International Copyright Law’s Ability to Protect the Interests of the Contemporary Artist
title_short Beyond Oil on Canvas: New Media and Presentation Formats Challenge International Copyright Law’s Ability to Protect the Interests of the Contemporary Artist
title_sort beyond oil on canvas new media and presentation formats challenge international copyright law s ability to protect the interests of the contemporary artist
url http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/script-ed/vol3-1/torsen.asp
work_keys_str_mv AT mollyanntorsen beyondoiloncanvasnewmediaandpresentationformatschallengeinternationalcopyrightlawsabilitytoprotecttheinterestsofthecontemporaryartist