Success Rate of Formocresol Pulpotomy versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Human Primary Molar Tooth

Background: In spite of long time and broad use of formaldehyde derivates (Fixation agent) in primary tooth pulp treatment, There is some concerns about these derivates such as variability, inconsistency success rate, mutagenicity, cytotoxicity, alergenicity, and some other potential health hazards...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S E Jabbarifar, A A Khademi, D Ghasemi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2004-12-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Online Access:http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/937
_version_ 1818937758038622208
author S E Jabbarifar
A A Khademi
D Ghasemi
author_facet S E Jabbarifar
A A Khademi
D Ghasemi
author_sort S E Jabbarifar
collection DOAJ
description Background: In spite of long time and broad use of formaldehyde derivates (Fixation agent) in primary tooth pulp treatment, There is some concerns about these derivates such as variability, inconsistency success rate, mutagenicity, cytotoxicity, alergenicity, and some other potential health hazards of them. Therefore other alternative pulpotomy procedures like Bioactive glass (BAG), Glutaraldehyde (2%), Hydroxyappetite (HA), Bone dried freezed (BDF), ferric sulfate (15%), laser, Electrosurgery (ES), Bone Morphogenic proteins (BMP), recombinant protein-1 (RP1), and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) have been compared. The purpose of this clinical trial is to assess radiographic and clinical success rate of Formocresol (FC) pulpotomy in compare with MTA in human primary molar teeth. Methods: 64 molars were pulpotomized equally and randomly with mineral trioxide Aggregate and Formocresol. Prior to trial, we defined a case as failure, when one or more of the events such as external root resorption, internal root resorption, periapical and furca lucency, pain, swelling, mobility, dental abscess, or early extraction appeared. Every treated tooth was defined as successful, if any noted evident was not shown. Results: Totally, 60 teeth treatment (92.2 percent) were successful and 7.8 percent were failed. Failure and success rates for MTA group were 6.3 and 93.7 percent, respectively. Failure and success rates in FC group were 8.4 and 90.2 percent respectively. The difference between MTA and FC treatment methods was not significant (Fisher Exact test). Conclusion: Findings of this study show that mineral trioxide aggregate can be an alternative procedure for FC pulpotomy of primary tooth. Keywords: Mineral trioxide aggregate, formocresol, pulpotomy, success and failure rate.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T05:57:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-10c0b9902d96479b849866813e0da09c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T05:57:02Z
publishDate 2004-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-10c0b9902d96479b849866813e0da09c2022-12-21T19:51:00ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362004-12-0196304307Success Rate of Formocresol Pulpotomy versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Human Primary Molar ToothS E JabbarifarA A KhademiD GhasemiBackground: In spite of long time and broad use of formaldehyde derivates (Fixation agent) in primary tooth pulp treatment, There is some concerns about these derivates such as variability, inconsistency success rate, mutagenicity, cytotoxicity, alergenicity, and some other potential health hazards of them. Therefore other alternative pulpotomy procedures like Bioactive glass (BAG), Glutaraldehyde (2%), Hydroxyappetite (HA), Bone dried freezed (BDF), ferric sulfate (15%), laser, Electrosurgery (ES), Bone Morphogenic proteins (BMP), recombinant protein-1 (RP1), and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) have been compared. The purpose of this clinical trial is to assess radiographic and clinical success rate of Formocresol (FC) pulpotomy in compare with MTA in human primary molar teeth. Methods: 64 molars were pulpotomized equally and randomly with mineral trioxide Aggregate and Formocresol. Prior to trial, we defined a case as failure, when one or more of the events such as external root resorption, internal root resorption, periapical and furca lucency, pain, swelling, mobility, dental abscess, or early extraction appeared. Every treated tooth was defined as successful, if any noted evident was not shown. Results: Totally, 60 teeth treatment (92.2 percent) were successful and 7.8 percent were failed. Failure and success rates for MTA group were 6.3 and 93.7 percent, respectively. Failure and success rates in FC group were 8.4 and 90.2 percent respectively. The difference between MTA and FC treatment methods was not significant (Fisher Exact test). Conclusion: Findings of this study show that mineral trioxide aggregate can be an alternative procedure for FC pulpotomy of primary tooth. Keywords: Mineral trioxide aggregate, formocresol, pulpotomy, success and failure rate.http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/937
spellingShingle S E Jabbarifar
A A Khademi
D Ghasemi
Success Rate of Formocresol Pulpotomy versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Human Primary Molar Tooth
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
title Success Rate of Formocresol Pulpotomy versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Human Primary Molar Tooth
title_full Success Rate of Formocresol Pulpotomy versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Human Primary Molar Tooth
title_fullStr Success Rate of Formocresol Pulpotomy versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Human Primary Molar Tooth
title_full_unstemmed Success Rate of Formocresol Pulpotomy versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Human Primary Molar Tooth
title_short Success Rate of Formocresol Pulpotomy versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Human Primary Molar Tooth
title_sort success rate of formocresol pulpotomy versus mineral trioxide aggregate in human primary molar tooth
url http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/937
work_keys_str_mv AT sejabbarifar successrateofformocresolpulpotomyversusmineraltrioxideaggregateinhumanprimarymolartooth
AT aakhademi successrateofformocresolpulpotomyversusmineraltrioxideaggregateinhumanprimarymolartooth
AT dghasemi successrateofformocresolpulpotomyversusmineraltrioxideaggregateinhumanprimarymolartooth