Comparison of methods for nocturnal sampling of predatory zooplankters in shallow waters

The aim of the study was to assess the suitability of a plankton net (diameter of 60 cm, mesh size of 500 µm) and a column sampler (length of 200 cm, diameter of 5 cm) for estimating the density of zooplankton predatory species (Neomysis integer, Leptodora kindtii, Cercopagis pengoi). Nocturnal samp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomasz B. Linkowski, Ryszard Kornijów, Maciej Karpowicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Oceanologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0078323420301032
_version_ 1818857240930549760
author Tomasz B. Linkowski
Ryszard Kornijów
Maciej Karpowicz
author_facet Tomasz B. Linkowski
Ryszard Kornijów
Maciej Karpowicz
author_sort Tomasz B. Linkowski
collection DOAJ
description The aim of the study was to assess the suitability of a plankton net (diameter of 60 cm, mesh size of 500 µm) and a column sampler (length of 200 cm, diameter of 5 cm) for estimating the density of zooplankton predatory species (Neomysis integer, Leptodora kindtii, Cercopagis pengoi). Nocturnal sampling was performed once a month (May–November 2018) in the Vistula Lagoon (southern Baltic) in the range depth of 1.3–3.6 m. Statistical analysis indicated no significant differences between the N. integer and C. pengoi density estimated by the two sampling gears. In the case of L. kindtii, the mean density obtained by the column sampler was higher when analyzing all samples together and/or deep-water samples only (p < 0.02). However, no such differences were found at shallow stations i.e. up to ca. 2 m in depth. It was assumed that the more suitable sampling equipment for estimating zooplankton abundance in a shallow, well-mixed transitional (brackish) basin is the column sampler. This type of gear, so far used mainly for sampling of micro and mesozooplankton, allows the simultaneous nocturnal collection of the entire zooplankton size spectrum, including representatives of large predatory species. The suitability of light traps for qualitative studies of zooplankton species responding positively to light under the high turbidity of the Vistula Lagoon was also investigated. The traps proved to be most useful for N. integer (100% frequency), and much less for L. kindtii (46.2%) and C. pengoi (27.3%).
first_indexed 2024-12-19T08:37:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-10d112d0327046f8ba64411ab20d9c28
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0078-3234
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T08:37:15Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Oceanologia
spelling doaj.art-10d112d0327046f8ba64411ab20d9c282022-12-21T20:29:01ZengElsevierOceanologia0078-32342021-01-016317179Comparison of methods for nocturnal sampling of predatory zooplankters in shallow watersTomasz B. Linkowski0Ryszard Kornijów1Maciej Karpowicz2Department of Fisheries Oceanography and Marine Ecology, National Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Gdynia, Poland; Corresponding author at: Department of Fisheries Oceanography and Marine Ecology, National Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kołłątaja 1, 81–332 Gdynia, Poland.Department of Fisheries Oceanography and Marine Ecology, National Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Gdynia, PolandDepartment of Hydrobiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Białystok, Białystok, PolandThe aim of the study was to assess the suitability of a plankton net (diameter of 60 cm, mesh size of 500 µm) and a column sampler (length of 200 cm, diameter of 5 cm) for estimating the density of zooplankton predatory species (Neomysis integer, Leptodora kindtii, Cercopagis pengoi). Nocturnal sampling was performed once a month (May–November 2018) in the Vistula Lagoon (southern Baltic) in the range depth of 1.3–3.6 m. Statistical analysis indicated no significant differences between the N. integer and C. pengoi density estimated by the two sampling gears. In the case of L. kindtii, the mean density obtained by the column sampler was higher when analyzing all samples together and/or deep-water samples only (p < 0.02). However, no such differences were found at shallow stations i.e. up to ca. 2 m in depth. It was assumed that the more suitable sampling equipment for estimating zooplankton abundance in a shallow, well-mixed transitional (brackish) basin is the column sampler. This type of gear, so far used mainly for sampling of micro and mesozooplankton, allows the simultaneous nocturnal collection of the entire zooplankton size spectrum, including representatives of large predatory species. The suitability of light traps for qualitative studies of zooplankton species responding positively to light under the high turbidity of the Vistula Lagoon was also investigated. The traps proved to be most useful for N. integer (100% frequency), and much less for L. kindtii (46.2%) and C. pengoi (27.3%).http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0078323420301032Sampling methodsShallow watersVistula LagoonColumn samplerLight traps, LeptodoraNeomysis
spellingShingle Tomasz B. Linkowski
Ryszard Kornijów
Maciej Karpowicz
Comparison of methods for nocturnal sampling of predatory zooplankters in shallow waters
Oceanologia
Sampling methods
Shallow waters
Vistula Lagoon
Column sampler
Light traps, Leptodora
Neomysis
title Comparison of methods for nocturnal sampling of predatory zooplankters in shallow waters
title_full Comparison of methods for nocturnal sampling of predatory zooplankters in shallow waters
title_fullStr Comparison of methods for nocturnal sampling of predatory zooplankters in shallow waters
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods for nocturnal sampling of predatory zooplankters in shallow waters
title_short Comparison of methods for nocturnal sampling of predatory zooplankters in shallow waters
title_sort comparison of methods for nocturnal sampling of predatory zooplankters in shallow waters
topic Sampling methods
Shallow waters
Vistula Lagoon
Column sampler
Light traps, Leptodora
Neomysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0078323420301032
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaszblinkowski comparisonofmethodsfornocturnalsamplingofpredatoryzooplanktersinshallowwaters
AT ryszardkornijow comparisonofmethodsfornocturnalsamplingofpredatoryzooplanktersinshallowwaters
AT maciejkarpowicz comparisonofmethodsfornocturnalsamplingofpredatoryzooplanktersinshallowwaters