Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against <i>Lactococcus petauri</i> Infection in Rainbow Trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>)

<i>Lactococcus petauri</i> is an important emergent bacterial pathogen of salmonids in the USA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the protection conferred to rainbow trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>) against <i>L. petauri</i> by formalin-killed vaccines i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tryssa de Ruyter, Eric Littman, Zeinab Yazdi, Mark Adkison, Alvin Camus, Susan Yun, Timothy J. Welch, William R. Keleher, Esteban Soto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Pathogens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/5/632
_version_ 1797598747546353664
author Tryssa de Ruyter
Eric Littman
Zeinab Yazdi
Mark Adkison
Alvin Camus
Susan Yun
Timothy J. Welch
William R. Keleher
Esteban Soto
author_facet Tryssa de Ruyter
Eric Littman
Zeinab Yazdi
Mark Adkison
Alvin Camus
Susan Yun
Timothy J. Welch
William R. Keleher
Esteban Soto
author_sort Tryssa de Ruyter
collection DOAJ
description <i>Lactococcus petauri</i> is an important emergent bacterial pathogen of salmonids in the USA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the protection conferred to rainbow trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>) against <i>L. petauri</i> by formalin-killed vaccines in immersion and injectable forms, as well as the enhanced protection afforded by booster vaccination. In the first challenge, fish were immunized via intracoelomic injection (IC) or immersion (Imm) routes alone. Approximately 418 degree days (Temperature in degree Celsius × days post-immunization) (dd) Imm, or 622 dd IC post-vaccination, fish were challenged via IC with wild-type <i>L. petauri.</i> In the second experiment, initial Imm vaccination was followed by booster vaccination via Imm or IC routes 273 dd post-immunization along with appropriate PBS controls. The various vaccination protocol efficacies were evaluated by challenging fish with <i>L. petauri</i> by cohabitation with diseased fish 399 dd post-booster administration. A relative percent survival (RPS) of 89.5% and 28% was recorded in the IC and Imm single immunization treatments, respectively. In the second study, an RPS of 97.5%, 10.2%, 2.6% and −10.1% plus approximately 0%, 50%, 20%, and 30% bacterial persistence was recorded in the Imm immunized + IC boosted, Imm immunized + mock IC boosted, Imm immunized + Imm boosted, and Imm immunized + mock Imm boosted treatments, respectively. Only the Imm immunized + IC injection boosted treatments provided significant protection when compared to unvaccinated and challenged treatments (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In conclusion, although both Imm and IC vaccines appear safe for trout, the inactivated Imm vaccines seem to provide only mild and temporary protection against lactococcosis; whereas IC immunized trout develop a significantly stronger protective response in both challenges.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:25:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-10d6282ee51c484ebd18ca6148a2ab82
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0817
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:25:08Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pathogens
spelling doaj.art-10d6282ee51c484ebd18ca6148a2ab822023-11-18T02:46:08ZengMDPI AGPathogens2076-08172023-04-0112563210.3390/pathogens12050632Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against <i>Lactococcus petauri</i> Infection in Rainbow Trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>)Tryssa de Ruyter0Eric Littman1Zeinab Yazdi2Mark Adkison3Alvin Camus4Susan Yun5Timothy J. Welch6William R. Keleher7Esteban Soto8Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USACalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670, USADepartment of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USADepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USANational Center for Cool and Coldwater Aquaculture, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USAKennebec River Biosciences, Richmond, ME 04357, USADepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA<i>Lactococcus petauri</i> is an important emergent bacterial pathogen of salmonids in the USA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the protection conferred to rainbow trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>) against <i>L. petauri</i> by formalin-killed vaccines in immersion and injectable forms, as well as the enhanced protection afforded by booster vaccination. In the first challenge, fish were immunized via intracoelomic injection (IC) or immersion (Imm) routes alone. Approximately 418 degree days (Temperature in degree Celsius × days post-immunization) (dd) Imm, or 622 dd IC post-vaccination, fish were challenged via IC with wild-type <i>L. petauri.</i> In the second experiment, initial Imm vaccination was followed by booster vaccination via Imm or IC routes 273 dd post-immunization along with appropriate PBS controls. The various vaccination protocol efficacies were evaluated by challenging fish with <i>L. petauri</i> by cohabitation with diseased fish 399 dd post-booster administration. A relative percent survival (RPS) of 89.5% and 28% was recorded in the IC and Imm single immunization treatments, respectively. In the second study, an RPS of 97.5%, 10.2%, 2.6% and −10.1% plus approximately 0%, 50%, 20%, and 30% bacterial persistence was recorded in the Imm immunized + IC boosted, Imm immunized + mock IC boosted, Imm immunized + Imm boosted, and Imm immunized + mock Imm boosted treatments, respectively. Only the Imm immunized + IC injection boosted treatments provided significant protection when compared to unvaccinated and challenged treatments (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In conclusion, although both Imm and IC vaccines appear safe for trout, the inactivated Imm vaccines seem to provide only mild and temporary protection against lactococcosis; whereas IC immunized trout develop a significantly stronger protective response in both challenges.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/5/632aquaculture vaccineboosteremergentinjectionimmersionlactococcosis
spellingShingle Tryssa de Ruyter
Eric Littman
Zeinab Yazdi
Mark Adkison
Alvin Camus
Susan Yun
Timothy J. Welch
William R. Keleher
Esteban Soto
Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against <i>Lactococcus petauri</i> Infection in Rainbow Trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>)
Pathogens
aquaculture vaccine
booster
emergent
injection
immersion
lactococcosis
title Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against <i>Lactococcus petauri</i> Infection in Rainbow Trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>)
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against <i>Lactococcus petauri</i> Infection in Rainbow Trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>)
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against <i>Lactococcus petauri</i> Infection in Rainbow Trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against <i>Lactococcus petauri</i> Infection in Rainbow Trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>)
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against <i>Lactococcus petauri</i> Infection in Rainbow Trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>)
title_sort comparative evaluation of booster vaccine efficacy by intracoelomic injection and immersion with a whole cell killed vaccine against i lactococcus petauri i infection in rainbow trout i oncorhynchus mykiss i
topic aquaculture vaccine
booster
emergent
injection
immersion
lactococcosis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/5/632
work_keys_str_mv AT tryssaderuyter comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstilactococcuspetauriiinfectioninrainbowtroutioncorhynchusmykissi
AT ericlittman comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstilactococcuspetauriiinfectioninrainbowtroutioncorhynchusmykissi
AT zeinabyazdi comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstilactococcuspetauriiinfectioninrainbowtroutioncorhynchusmykissi
AT markadkison comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstilactococcuspetauriiinfectioninrainbowtroutioncorhynchusmykissi
AT alvincamus comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstilactococcuspetauriiinfectioninrainbowtroutioncorhynchusmykissi
AT susanyun comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstilactococcuspetauriiinfectioninrainbowtroutioncorhynchusmykissi
AT timothyjwelch comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstilactococcuspetauriiinfectioninrainbowtroutioncorhynchusmykissi
AT williamrkeleher comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstilactococcuspetauriiinfectioninrainbowtroutioncorhynchusmykissi
AT estebansoto comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstilactococcuspetauriiinfectioninrainbowtroutioncorhynchusmykissi