An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants

Abstract Background Stool metabolites provide essential insights into the function of the gut microbiome. The current gold standard for storage of stool samples for metabolomics is flash-freezing at − 80 °C which can be inconvenient and expensive. Ambient temperature storage of stool is more practic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sivapriya Ramamoorthy, Shira Levy, Masouma Mohamed, Alaa Abdelghani, Anne M. Evans, Luke A. D. Miller, Lopa Mehta, Sean Moore, Elizaveta Freinkman, Suchitra K. Hourigan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-02-01
Series:BMC Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02104-6
_version_ 1818582863759540224
author Sivapriya Ramamoorthy
Shira Levy
Masouma Mohamed
Alaa Abdelghani
Anne M. Evans
Luke A. D. Miller
Lopa Mehta
Sean Moore
Elizaveta Freinkman
Suchitra K. Hourigan
author_facet Sivapriya Ramamoorthy
Shira Levy
Masouma Mohamed
Alaa Abdelghani
Anne M. Evans
Luke A. D. Miller
Lopa Mehta
Sean Moore
Elizaveta Freinkman
Suchitra K. Hourigan
author_sort Sivapriya Ramamoorthy
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Stool metabolites provide essential insights into the function of the gut microbiome. The current gold standard for storage of stool samples for metabolomics is flash-freezing at − 80 °C which can be inconvenient and expensive. Ambient temperature storage of stool is more practical, however no available methodologies adequately preserve the metabolomic profile of stool. A novel sampling kit (OMNImet.GUT; DNA Genotek, Inc.) was introduced for ambient temperature storage and stabilization of feces for metabolomics; we aimed to test the performance of this kit vs. flash-freezing. To do this stool was collected from an infant’s diaper was divided into two aliquots: 1) flash-frozen and 2) stored in an OMNImet.GUT tube at ambient temperature for 3–4 days. Samples from the same infant were collected at 2 different time points to assess metabolite changes over time. Subsequently, all samples underwent metabolomic analysis by liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results Paired fecal samples (flash-frozen and ambient temperature) from 16 infants were collected at 2 time points (32 individual samples, 64 aliquots). Similar numbers of metabolites were detected in both the frozen and ambient temperature samples (1126 in frozen, 1107 in ambient temperature, 1064 shared between sample types). Metabolite abundances were strongly correlated between storage methods (median Spearman correlation Rs = 0.785 across metabolites). Hierarchical clustering analysis and principal component analysis showed that samples from the same individuals at a given time point clustered closely, regardless of the storage method. Repeat samples from the same individual were compared by paired t-test, separately for the frozen and OMNImet.GUT. The number of metabolites in each biochemical class that significantly changed (p < 0.05) at timepoint 2 relative to timepoint 1 was similar in flash-frozen versus ambient temperature storage. Changes in microbiota modified metabolites over time were also consistent across both methodologies. Conclusion Ambient temperature storage and stabilization of stool in the OMNImet.GUT device yielded comparable metabolomic results to flash freezing in terms of 1) the identity and abundance of detected biochemicals 2) the distinct metabolomic profiles of subjects and 3) changes in metabolites over time that are plausibly microbiota-induced. This method potentially provides a more convenient, less expensive home collection and storage option for stool metabolomic analysis.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T07:56:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-10db1355326c4899bcb0816039dc4230
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2180
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T07:56:09Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-10db1355326c4899bcb0816039dc42302022-12-21T22:38:42ZengBMCBMC Microbiology1471-21802021-02-0121111010.1186/s12866-021-02104-6An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infantsSivapriya Ramamoorthy0Shira Levy1Masouma Mohamed2Alaa Abdelghani3Anne M. Evans4Luke A. D. Miller5Lopa Mehta6Sean Moore7Elizaveta Freinkman8Suchitra K. Hourigan9MetabolonInova Children’s HospitalInova Children’s HospitalInova Children’s HospitalMetabolonMetabolonInova Health SystemDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of VirginiaMetabolonInova Children’s HospitalAbstract Background Stool metabolites provide essential insights into the function of the gut microbiome. The current gold standard for storage of stool samples for metabolomics is flash-freezing at − 80 °C which can be inconvenient and expensive. Ambient temperature storage of stool is more practical, however no available methodologies adequately preserve the metabolomic profile of stool. A novel sampling kit (OMNImet.GUT; DNA Genotek, Inc.) was introduced for ambient temperature storage and stabilization of feces for metabolomics; we aimed to test the performance of this kit vs. flash-freezing. To do this stool was collected from an infant’s diaper was divided into two aliquots: 1) flash-frozen and 2) stored in an OMNImet.GUT tube at ambient temperature for 3–4 days. Samples from the same infant were collected at 2 different time points to assess metabolite changes over time. Subsequently, all samples underwent metabolomic analysis by liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results Paired fecal samples (flash-frozen and ambient temperature) from 16 infants were collected at 2 time points (32 individual samples, 64 aliquots). Similar numbers of metabolites were detected in both the frozen and ambient temperature samples (1126 in frozen, 1107 in ambient temperature, 1064 shared between sample types). Metabolite abundances were strongly correlated between storage methods (median Spearman correlation Rs = 0.785 across metabolites). Hierarchical clustering analysis and principal component analysis showed that samples from the same individuals at a given time point clustered closely, regardless of the storage method. Repeat samples from the same individual were compared by paired t-test, separately for the frozen and OMNImet.GUT. The number of metabolites in each biochemical class that significantly changed (p < 0.05) at timepoint 2 relative to timepoint 1 was similar in flash-frozen versus ambient temperature storage. Changes in microbiota modified metabolites over time were also consistent across both methodologies. Conclusion Ambient temperature storage and stabilization of stool in the OMNImet.GUT device yielded comparable metabolomic results to flash freezing in terms of 1) the identity and abundance of detected biochemicals 2) the distinct metabolomic profiles of subjects and 3) changes in metabolites over time that are plausibly microbiota-induced. This method potentially provides a more convenient, less expensive home collection and storage option for stool metabolomic analysis.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02104-6MetabolomicsStoolMicrobiomeInfantsAmbient temperature
spellingShingle Sivapriya Ramamoorthy
Shira Levy
Masouma Mohamed
Alaa Abdelghani
Anne M. Evans
Luke A. D. Miller
Lopa Mehta
Sean Moore
Elizaveta Freinkman
Suchitra K. Hourigan
An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants
BMC Microbiology
Metabolomics
Stool
Microbiome
Infants
Ambient temperature
title An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants
title_full An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants
title_fullStr An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants
title_full_unstemmed An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants
title_short An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants
title_sort ambient temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants
topic Metabolomics
Stool
Microbiome
Infants
Ambient temperature
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02104-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sivapriyaramamoorthy anambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT shiralevy anambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT masoumamohamed anambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT alaaabdelghani anambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT annemevans anambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT lukeadmiller anambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT lopamehta anambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT seanmoore anambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT elizavetafreinkman anambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT suchitrakhourigan anambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT sivapriyaramamoorthy ambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT shiralevy ambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT masoumamohamed ambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT alaaabdelghani ambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT annemevans ambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT lukeadmiller ambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT lopamehta ambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT seanmoore ambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT elizavetafreinkman ambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants
AT suchitrakhourigan ambienttemperaturestorageandstabilizationdeviceperformscomparablytoflashfrozencollectionforstoolmetabolomicsininfants