Instrumental Trouble: A Queer Organology of Hugh Davies’s Found Instruments

Organology, the study of musical instruments, has traditionally concentrated on the documentation of instru­ments: their history, roles in culture, and classification. However, as post-modern, feminist, and post-colonial perspectives have questioned some of the assumptions inherent in historiographi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Settimio Fiorenzo Palermo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ośrodek Studiów Amerykańskich Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego 2019-08-01
Series:InterAlia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://interalia.queerstudies.pl/issues/15_2020/InterAlia_15-2020_Palermo.pdf
Description
Summary:Organology, the study of musical instruments, has traditionally concentrated on the documentation of instru­ments: their history, roles in culture, and classification. However, as post-modern, feminist, and post-colonial perspectives have questioned some of the assumptions inherent in historiographical, ethnographic, and posi­tivist endeavours because of their part in reproducing hegemonic ideologies, re-thinking organology and thus developing a richer account of musical instruments has become an urgent task. With this regard a queer pe­rspective in organology, in particular informed by Judith Butler’s theories of “gender trouble,” is crucial in agi­tating normative beliefs, values, and attitudes that underpin notions of instrumental identity, interaction, and meaning. A queer organology becomes especially significant in the critical engagement with musical instru­ments like those invented by the British composer, performer, and inventor Hugh Davies (1943-2005), and in particular his entirely found, amplified, new musical instruments. This is because the challenges to traditional instrumental ontologies, the “instrumental trouble” that these instruments pose: reveal the boundaries of con­ventional organological approaches and methodologies, which are unsuitable in capturing their full signi­fi­cance. Deploying Butler’s concepts of recognition, performativity, and subversion in their study can thus repre­sent an effective strategy in the development of a coherent critique of Davies’s instruments, but also in offering an opportunity to further the understanding of the fundamental importance that musical instruments play in the articulations of music, as part of what may be called an “instrumental turn.”
ISSN:1689-6637