Identification of a DNA Damage Response and Repair-Related Gene-Pair Signature for Prognosis Stratification Analysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: Nowadays, although the cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mortality and recurrence remains at a high level, the 5-year survival rate is still very low. The DNA damage response and repair (DDR) pathway may affect HCC patients’ survival by influencing tumor development and therapeutic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Chen, Mengjia Huang, Junkai Zhu, Li Xu, Wenxuan Cheng, Xiaofan Lu, Fangrong Yan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.857060/full
_version_ 1811279339586584576
author Yi Chen
Mengjia Huang
Junkai Zhu
Li Xu
Wenxuan Cheng
Xiaofan Lu
Fangrong Yan
author_facet Yi Chen
Mengjia Huang
Junkai Zhu
Li Xu
Wenxuan Cheng
Xiaofan Lu
Fangrong Yan
author_sort Yi Chen
collection DOAJ
description Background: Nowadays, although the cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mortality and recurrence remains at a high level, the 5-year survival rate is still very low. The DNA damage response and repair (DDR) pathway may affect HCC patients’ survival by influencing tumor development and therapeutic response. It is necessary to identify a prognostic DDR-related gene signature to predict the outcome of patients.Methods: Level 3 mRNA expression and clinical information were extracted from the TCGA website. The GSE14520 datasets, ICGC-LIRI datasets, and a Chinese HCC cohort were served as validation sets. Univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO-penalized Cox regression analysis were performed to construct the DDR-related gene pair (DRGP) signature. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis curves were calculated to determine the predictive ability of this prognostic model. Then, a prognostic nomogram was established to help clinical management. We investigated the difference in biological processes between HRisk and LRisk by conducting several enrichment analyses. The TIDE algorithm and R package “pRRophetic” were applied to estimate the immunotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic response.Results: We constructed the prognostic signature based on 23 DDR-related gene pairs. The patients in the training datasets were divided into HRisk and LRisk groups at median cut-off. The HRisk group had significantly poorer OS than the LRisk group, and the signature was an independent prognostic indicator in HCC. Furthermore, a nomogram of the riskscore combined with TNM stage was constructed and detected by the calibration curve and decision curve. The LRisk group was associated with higher expression of HBV oncoproteins and metabolism pathways, while DDR-relevant pathways and cell cycle process were enriched in the HRisk group. Moreover, patients in the LRisk group may be more beneficial from immunotherapy. We also found that TP53 gene was more frequently mutated in the HRisk group. As for chemotherapeutic drugs commonly used in HCC, the HRisk group was highly sensitive to 5-fluorouracil, while the LRisk group presented with a significantly higher response to gefitinib and gemcitabine.Conclusion: Overall, we developed a novel DDR-related gene pair signature and nomogram to assist in predicting survival outcomes and clinical treatment of HCC patients. It also helps understand the underlying mechanisms of different DDR patterns in HCC.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T00:52:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-10eadff4a89c48efa8590fa30db8e7e0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-9812
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T00:52:53Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-10eadff4a89c48efa8590fa30db8e7e02022-12-22T03:09:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122022-04-011310.3389/fphar.2022.857060857060Identification of a DNA Damage Response and Repair-Related Gene-Pair Signature for Prognosis Stratification Analysis in Hepatocellular CarcinomaYi ChenMengjia HuangJunkai ZhuLi XuWenxuan ChengXiaofan LuFangrong YanBackground: Nowadays, although the cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mortality and recurrence remains at a high level, the 5-year survival rate is still very low. The DNA damage response and repair (DDR) pathway may affect HCC patients’ survival by influencing tumor development and therapeutic response. It is necessary to identify a prognostic DDR-related gene signature to predict the outcome of patients.Methods: Level 3 mRNA expression and clinical information were extracted from the TCGA website. The GSE14520 datasets, ICGC-LIRI datasets, and a Chinese HCC cohort were served as validation sets. Univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO-penalized Cox regression analysis were performed to construct the DDR-related gene pair (DRGP) signature. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis curves were calculated to determine the predictive ability of this prognostic model. Then, a prognostic nomogram was established to help clinical management. We investigated the difference in biological processes between HRisk and LRisk by conducting several enrichment analyses. The TIDE algorithm and R package “pRRophetic” were applied to estimate the immunotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic response.Results: We constructed the prognostic signature based on 23 DDR-related gene pairs. The patients in the training datasets were divided into HRisk and LRisk groups at median cut-off. The HRisk group had significantly poorer OS than the LRisk group, and the signature was an independent prognostic indicator in HCC. Furthermore, a nomogram of the riskscore combined with TNM stage was constructed and detected by the calibration curve and decision curve. The LRisk group was associated with higher expression of HBV oncoproteins and metabolism pathways, while DDR-relevant pathways and cell cycle process were enriched in the HRisk group. Moreover, patients in the LRisk group may be more beneficial from immunotherapy. We also found that TP53 gene was more frequently mutated in the HRisk group. As for chemotherapeutic drugs commonly used in HCC, the HRisk group was highly sensitive to 5-fluorouracil, while the LRisk group presented with a significantly higher response to gefitinib and gemcitabine.Conclusion: Overall, we developed a novel DDR-related gene pair signature and nomogram to assist in predicting survival outcomes and clinical treatment of HCC patients. It also helps understand the underlying mechanisms of different DDR patterns in HCC.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.857060/fullDNA damage response and repairhepatocellular carcinomaprognosisHBVchemotherapy
spellingShingle Yi Chen
Mengjia Huang
Junkai Zhu
Li Xu
Wenxuan Cheng
Xiaofan Lu
Fangrong Yan
Identification of a DNA Damage Response and Repair-Related Gene-Pair Signature for Prognosis Stratification Analysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Frontiers in Pharmacology
DNA damage response and repair
hepatocellular carcinoma
prognosis
HBV
chemotherapy
title Identification of a DNA Damage Response and Repair-Related Gene-Pair Signature for Prognosis Stratification Analysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full Identification of a DNA Damage Response and Repair-Related Gene-Pair Signature for Prognosis Stratification Analysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_fullStr Identification of a DNA Damage Response and Repair-Related Gene-Pair Signature for Prognosis Stratification Analysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Identification of a DNA Damage Response and Repair-Related Gene-Pair Signature for Prognosis Stratification Analysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_short Identification of a DNA Damage Response and Repair-Related Gene-Pair Signature for Prognosis Stratification Analysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_sort identification of a dna damage response and repair related gene pair signature for prognosis stratification analysis in hepatocellular carcinoma
topic DNA damage response and repair
hepatocellular carcinoma
prognosis
HBV
chemotherapy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.857060/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yichen identificationofadnadamageresponseandrepairrelatedgenepairsignatureforprognosisstratificationanalysisinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT mengjiahuang identificationofadnadamageresponseandrepairrelatedgenepairsignatureforprognosisstratificationanalysisinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT junkaizhu identificationofadnadamageresponseandrepairrelatedgenepairsignatureforprognosisstratificationanalysisinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT lixu identificationofadnadamageresponseandrepairrelatedgenepairsignatureforprognosisstratificationanalysisinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wenxuancheng identificationofadnadamageresponseandrepairrelatedgenepairsignatureforprognosisstratificationanalysisinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT xiaofanlu identificationofadnadamageresponseandrepairrelatedgenepairsignatureforprognosisstratificationanalysisinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT fangrongyan identificationofadnadamageresponseandrepairrelatedgenepairsignatureforprognosisstratificationanalysisinhepatocellularcarcinoma