The impact of bio-logging on body weight change of the Eurasian beaver.

Bio-logging is a common method to collect ecological data on wild animals, but might also induce stress, reduce body condition, and alter behavior. Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) are a semi-aquatic and nocturnal species that are challenging to observe in the wild. Bio-loggers are hence useful tools...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Andre Robstad, Hanna Kavli Lodberg-Holm, Martin Mayer, Frank Rosell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261453
_version_ 1818966177005699072
author Christian Andre Robstad
Hanna Kavli Lodberg-Holm
Martin Mayer
Frank Rosell
author_facet Christian Andre Robstad
Hanna Kavli Lodberg-Holm
Martin Mayer
Frank Rosell
author_sort Christian Andre Robstad
collection DOAJ
description Bio-logging is a common method to collect ecological data on wild animals, but might also induce stress, reduce body condition, and alter behavior. Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) are a semi-aquatic and nocturnal species that are challenging to observe in the wild. Bio-loggers are hence useful tools to study their behaviour and movements, but this raises concerns of potential negative impacts of tagging. To investigate the potential negative impacts of glue-on tags, we compared body weight change for tagged and untagged Eurasian beavers. We hypothesized that tagged beavers would gain less body weight compared to untagged beavers, and that weight change might be affected by tagging length, tag weight, water temperature and the season of tagging. Daily percentage body weight change in relation to initial body weight during the first capture was compared during 57 tagging periods (18±7 days) and 32 controls periods (64±47 days). Body weight change varied between the two groups, with untagged beavers on average gaining daily weight whilst tagged beavers on average lost weight daily, indicating a negative effect of tagging. The average reduction in percentage body weight change per day for tagged beavers was small (0.1 ± 0.3%), and with large individual variation. Neither tag weight, number of tagging days, nor season were important in explaining body weight change of tagged animals. In other words, we found that tagging reduced daily body weight during the tagging period but were unable to determine the mechanism(s) responsible for this decline. Detrimental effects of tagging have important implications for animal welfare and can introduce bias in data that are collected. This calls for careful consideration in the use of tags. We conclude that studies investigating the effects of tagging should consider individual variation in the effects of tagging and, where possible, compare tagged animals with a control group.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T13:28:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-110240602d1e439abb29da916a9d21a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T13:28:45Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-110240602d1e439abb29da916a9d21a62022-12-21T19:39:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-011612e026145310.1371/journal.pone.0261453The impact of bio-logging on body weight change of the Eurasian beaver.Christian Andre RobstadHanna Kavli Lodberg-HolmMartin MayerFrank RosellBio-logging is a common method to collect ecological data on wild animals, but might also induce stress, reduce body condition, and alter behavior. Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) are a semi-aquatic and nocturnal species that are challenging to observe in the wild. Bio-loggers are hence useful tools to study their behaviour and movements, but this raises concerns of potential negative impacts of tagging. To investigate the potential negative impacts of glue-on tags, we compared body weight change for tagged and untagged Eurasian beavers. We hypothesized that tagged beavers would gain less body weight compared to untagged beavers, and that weight change might be affected by tagging length, tag weight, water temperature and the season of tagging. Daily percentage body weight change in relation to initial body weight during the first capture was compared during 57 tagging periods (18±7 days) and 32 controls periods (64±47 days). Body weight change varied between the two groups, with untagged beavers on average gaining daily weight whilst tagged beavers on average lost weight daily, indicating a negative effect of tagging. The average reduction in percentage body weight change per day for tagged beavers was small (0.1 ± 0.3%), and with large individual variation. Neither tag weight, number of tagging days, nor season were important in explaining body weight change of tagged animals. In other words, we found that tagging reduced daily body weight during the tagging period but were unable to determine the mechanism(s) responsible for this decline. Detrimental effects of tagging have important implications for animal welfare and can introduce bias in data that are collected. This calls for careful consideration in the use of tags. We conclude that studies investigating the effects of tagging should consider individual variation in the effects of tagging and, where possible, compare tagged animals with a control group.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261453
spellingShingle Christian Andre Robstad
Hanna Kavli Lodberg-Holm
Martin Mayer
Frank Rosell
The impact of bio-logging on body weight change of the Eurasian beaver.
PLoS ONE
title The impact of bio-logging on body weight change of the Eurasian beaver.
title_full The impact of bio-logging on body weight change of the Eurasian beaver.
title_fullStr The impact of bio-logging on body weight change of the Eurasian beaver.
title_full_unstemmed The impact of bio-logging on body weight change of the Eurasian beaver.
title_short The impact of bio-logging on body weight change of the Eurasian beaver.
title_sort impact of bio logging on body weight change of the eurasian beaver
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261453
work_keys_str_mv AT christianandrerobstad theimpactofbiologgingonbodyweightchangeoftheeurasianbeaver
AT hannakavlilodbergholm theimpactofbiologgingonbodyweightchangeoftheeurasianbeaver
AT martinmayer theimpactofbiologgingonbodyweightchangeoftheeurasianbeaver
AT frankrosell theimpactofbiologgingonbodyweightchangeoftheeurasianbeaver
AT christianandrerobstad impactofbiologgingonbodyweightchangeoftheeurasianbeaver
AT hannakavlilodbergholm impactofbiologgingonbodyweightchangeoftheeurasianbeaver
AT martinmayer impactofbiologgingonbodyweightchangeoftheeurasianbeaver
AT frankrosell impactofbiologgingonbodyweightchangeoftheeurasianbeaver