CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6 and uPAR Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients with a Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy

Rectal cancer patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy can be monitored with a watch-and-wait strategy. However, regrowth rates indicate that identification of patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) remains challenging. Targeted near-infrared fluorescence endoscopy i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daan Linders, Marion Deken, Maxime van der Valk, Willemieke Tummers, Shadhvi Bhairosingh, Dennis Schaap, Gesina van Lijnschoten, Elham Zonoobi, Peter Kuppen, Cornelis van de Velde, Alexander Vahrmeijer, Arantza Farina Sarasqueta, Cornelis Sier, Denise Hilling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/3/516
_version_ 1827697672866234368
author Daan Linders
Marion Deken
Maxime van der Valk
Willemieke Tummers
Shadhvi Bhairosingh
Dennis Schaap
Gesina van Lijnschoten
Elham Zonoobi
Peter Kuppen
Cornelis van de Velde
Alexander Vahrmeijer
Arantza Farina Sarasqueta
Cornelis Sier
Denise Hilling
author_facet Daan Linders
Marion Deken
Maxime van der Valk
Willemieke Tummers
Shadhvi Bhairosingh
Dennis Schaap
Gesina van Lijnschoten
Elham Zonoobi
Peter Kuppen
Cornelis van de Velde
Alexander Vahrmeijer
Arantza Farina Sarasqueta
Cornelis Sier
Denise Hilling
author_sort Daan Linders
collection DOAJ
description Rectal cancer patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy can be monitored with a watch-and-wait strategy. However, regrowth rates indicate that identification of patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) remains challenging. Targeted near-infrared fluorescence endoscopy is a potential tool to improve response evaluation. Promising tumor targets include carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), integrin αvβ6, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR). To investigate the applicability of these targets, we analyzed protein expression by immunohistochemistry and quantified these by a total immunostaining score (TIS) in tissue of rectal cancer patients with a pCR. CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6, and uPAR expression in the diagnostic biopsy was high (TIS > 6) in, respectively, 100%, 100%, 33%, and 46% of cases. CEA and EpCAM expressions were significantly higher in the diagnostic biopsy compared with the corresponding tumor bed (<i>p</i> < 0.01). CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6, and uPAR expressions were low (TIS < 6) in the tumor bed in, respectively, 93%, 95%, 85%, and 62.5% of cases. Immunohistochemical evaluation shows that CEA and EpCAM could be suitable targets for response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment, since expression of these targets in the primary tumor bed is low compared with the diagnostic biopsy and adjacent pre-existent rectal mucosa in more than 90% of patients with a pCR.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:14:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11186ba4a95444b6aedc789f8d7454ad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:14:09Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-11186ba4a95444b6aedc789f8d7454ad2023-11-21T10:28:44ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182021-03-0111351610.3390/diagnostics11030516CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6 and uPAR Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients with a Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant TherapyDaan Linders0Marion Deken1Maxime van der Valk2Willemieke Tummers3Shadhvi Bhairosingh4Dennis Schaap5Gesina van Lijnschoten6Elham Zonoobi7Peter Kuppen8Cornelis van de Velde9Alexander Vahrmeijer10Arantza Farina Sarasqueta11Cornelis Sier12Denise Hilling13Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The NetherlandsLaboratory of Pathology, Stichting Pathology and Medical Microbiology, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The NetherlandsEdinburgh Molecular Imaging Ltd., Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UKDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsRectal cancer patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy can be monitored with a watch-and-wait strategy. However, regrowth rates indicate that identification of patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) remains challenging. Targeted near-infrared fluorescence endoscopy is a potential tool to improve response evaluation. Promising tumor targets include carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), integrin αvβ6, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR). To investigate the applicability of these targets, we analyzed protein expression by immunohistochemistry and quantified these by a total immunostaining score (TIS) in tissue of rectal cancer patients with a pCR. CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6, and uPAR expression in the diagnostic biopsy was high (TIS > 6) in, respectively, 100%, 100%, 33%, and 46% of cases. CEA and EpCAM expressions were significantly higher in the diagnostic biopsy compared with the corresponding tumor bed (<i>p</i> < 0.01). CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6, and uPAR expressions were low (TIS < 6) in the tumor bed in, respectively, 93%, 95%, 85%, and 62.5% of cases. Immunohistochemical evaluation shows that CEA and EpCAM could be suitable targets for response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment, since expression of these targets in the primary tumor bed is low compared with the diagnostic biopsy and adjacent pre-existent rectal mucosa in more than 90% of patients with a pCR.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/3/516CEAEpCAMαvβ6uPARfluorescence imagingcomplete response
spellingShingle Daan Linders
Marion Deken
Maxime van der Valk
Willemieke Tummers
Shadhvi Bhairosingh
Dennis Schaap
Gesina van Lijnschoten
Elham Zonoobi
Peter Kuppen
Cornelis van de Velde
Alexander Vahrmeijer
Arantza Farina Sarasqueta
Cornelis Sier
Denise Hilling
CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6 and uPAR Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients with a Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy
Diagnostics
CEA
EpCAM
αvβ6
uPAR
fluorescence imaging
complete response
title CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6 and uPAR Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients with a Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy
title_full CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6 and uPAR Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients with a Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy
title_fullStr CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6 and uPAR Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients with a Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy
title_full_unstemmed CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6 and uPAR Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients with a Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy
title_short CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6 and uPAR Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients with a Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy
title_sort cea epcam αvβ6 and upar expression in rectal cancer patients with a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy
topic CEA
EpCAM
αvβ6
uPAR
fluorescence imaging
complete response
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/3/516
work_keys_str_mv AT daanlinders ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT mariondeken ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT maximevandervalk ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT willemieketummers ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT shadhvibhairosingh ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT dennisschaap ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT gesinavanlijnschoten ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT elhamzonoobi ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT peterkuppen ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT cornelisvandevelde ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT alexandervahrmeijer ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT arantzafarinasarasqueta ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT cornelissier ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT denisehilling ceaepcamavb6anduparexpressioninrectalcancerpatientswithapathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttherapy