Aiming for G7 Master Compliance through a Color Managed Workflow: Comparison of Compliance with Amplitude Modulated (AM) vs. Frequency Modulated (FM) Screening of Multicolor Digital Printing

The purpose of this research was to determine the influence of screening technologies (AM vs. FM) in the color reproduction aimed at the G7 master compliance. The quality of digital color printing is determined by these influential factors: screening method applied, type of printing process, ink (dr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haji Naik Dharavath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Novi Sad 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.grid.uns.ac.rs/jged/download/v12n2/jged_v12_n2_p1.pdf
_version_ 1818927500141527040
author Haji Naik Dharavath
author_facet Haji Naik Dharavath
author_sort Haji Naik Dharavath
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this research was to determine the influence of screening technologies (AM vs. FM) in the color reproduction aimed at the G7 master compliance. The quality of digital color printing is determined by these influential factors: screening method applied, type of printing process, ink (dry-toner or liquid-toner), printer resolution and the substrate (paper). For this research, only the color printing attributes such as the G7 colors hue and chroma, gray balance, and overall color deviations were analyzed to examine the significant differences that exist between the two screening technologies (AM vs. FM). These are the color attributes which are monitored and managed for quality accuracy during the printing. Printed colorimetry of each screening from the experiment was compared against G7 ColorSpace GRACoL 2013 (CGATS21-2-CRPC6) in CIE L* a* b* space using an IDEAlliance (Chromix/Hutch Color) Curve 4.2.4 application interface with an X-Rite spectrophotometer with an i1iO table. The measured data of each screening were run through this application (Curve 4.2.4). The data of each screening were analyzed by using the Verify Tool of the Curve 4.2.4 application to determine the pass/fail of G7 master compliance levels using G7 ColorSpace tolerances (G7 Grayscale, G7 Targeted, and G7 Colorspace). Analyzed data from the experiment revealed that the printed colorimetric values of each screening (G7 Grayscale, G7 Targeted, and G7 Colorspace) are in match (aligned) with the G7 master compliance levels (reference/target) colorimetric values (G7 Grayscale, G7 Targeted, and G7 Colorspace). Therefore, the press run was passed by the Curve 4 application for both screening technologies tested.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T03:14:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1123ce40378d47b9840e86546d0a2311
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2217-379X
2217-9860
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T03:14:00Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher University of Novi Sad
record_format Article
series Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design
spelling doaj.art-1123ce40378d47b9840e86546d0a23112022-12-21T19:55:23ZengUniversity of Novi SadJournal of Graphic Engineering and Design2217-379X2217-98602021-06-0112251910.24867/JGED-2021-2-005Aiming for G7 Master Compliance through a Color Managed Workflow: Comparison of Compliance with Amplitude Modulated (AM) vs. Frequency Modulated (FM) Screening of Multicolor Digital PrintingHaji Naik Dharavath0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1185-7515Central Connecticut State University, Department of Computer Electronics & Graphics Technology, New Britain, USAThe purpose of this research was to determine the influence of screening technologies (AM vs. FM) in the color reproduction aimed at the G7 master compliance. The quality of digital color printing is determined by these influential factors: screening method applied, type of printing process, ink (dry-toner or liquid-toner), printer resolution and the substrate (paper). For this research, only the color printing attributes such as the G7 colors hue and chroma, gray balance, and overall color deviations were analyzed to examine the significant differences that exist between the two screening technologies (AM vs. FM). These are the color attributes which are monitored and managed for quality accuracy during the printing. Printed colorimetry of each screening from the experiment was compared against G7 ColorSpace GRACoL 2013 (CGATS21-2-CRPC6) in CIE L* a* b* space using an IDEAlliance (Chromix/Hutch Color) Curve 4.2.4 application interface with an X-Rite spectrophotometer with an i1iO table. The measured data of each screening were run through this application (Curve 4.2.4). The data of each screening were analyzed by using the Verify Tool of the Curve 4.2.4 application to determine the pass/fail of G7 master compliance levels using G7 ColorSpace tolerances (G7 Grayscale, G7 Targeted, and G7 Colorspace). Analyzed data from the experiment revealed that the printed colorimetric values of each screening (G7 Grayscale, G7 Targeted, and G7 Colorspace) are in match (aligned) with the G7 master compliance levels (reference/target) colorimetric values (G7 Grayscale, G7 Targeted, and G7 Colorspace). Therefore, the press run was passed by the Curve 4 application for both screening technologies tested.https://www.grid.uns.ac.rs/jged/download/v12n2/jged_v12_n2_p1.pdfg7calibrationcolorcolorimetrygamutprofilingscreening
spellingShingle Haji Naik Dharavath
Aiming for G7 Master Compliance through a Color Managed Workflow: Comparison of Compliance with Amplitude Modulated (AM) vs. Frequency Modulated (FM) Screening of Multicolor Digital Printing
Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design
g7
calibration
color
colorimetry
gamut
profiling
screening
title Aiming for G7 Master Compliance through a Color Managed Workflow: Comparison of Compliance with Amplitude Modulated (AM) vs. Frequency Modulated (FM) Screening of Multicolor Digital Printing
title_full Aiming for G7 Master Compliance through a Color Managed Workflow: Comparison of Compliance with Amplitude Modulated (AM) vs. Frequency Modulated (FM) Screening of Multicolor Digital Printing
title_fullStr Aiming for G7 Master Compliance through a Color Managed Workflow: Comparison of Compliance with Amplitude Modulated (AM) vs. Frequency Modulated (FM) Screening of Multicolor Digital Printing
title_full_unstemmed Aiming for G7 Master Compliance through a Color Managed Workflow: Comparison of Compliance with Amplitude Modulated (AM) vs. Frequency Modulated (FM) Screening of Multicolor Digital Printing
title_short Aiming for G7 Master Compliance through a Color Managed Workflow: Comparison of Compliance with Amplitude Modulated (AM) vs. Frequency Modulated (FM) Screening of Multicolor Digital Printing
title_sort aiming for g7 master compliance through a color managed workflow comparison of compliance with amplitude modulated am vs frequency modulated fm screening of multicolor digital printing
topic g7
calibration
color
colorimetry
gamut
profiling
screening
url https://www.grid.uns.ac.rs/jged/download/v12n2/jged_v12_n2_p1.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hajinaikdharavath aimingforg7mastercompliancethroughacolormanagedworkflowcomparisonofcompliancewithamplitudemodulatedamvsfrequencymodulatedfmscreeningofmulticolordigitalprinting