PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE HERITAGE PRESERVATION

Nowadays, heritage conservators are required to have not only a wide variety of technical but also social and human skills. The shift from a material-based conservation to an approach that focuses on subjects instead of objects (Muñoz Viñas, 2005, p. 147) is a structural approach in contemporary the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Helia Marcal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lublin University of Technology 2019-12-01
Series:Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/odk/article/view/1084
_version_ 1798029217297858560
author Helia Marcal
author_facet Helia Marcal
author_sort Helia Marcal
collection DOAJ
description Nowadays, heritage conservators are required to have not only a wide variety of technical but also social and human skills. The shift from a material-based conservation to an approach that focuses on subjects instead of objects (Muñoz Viñas, 2005, p. 147) is a structural approach in contemporary theories of conservation. This tendency towards subjectivity created many possibilities by exposing the multiple perspectives that surround a conservation object. At the same time, it made very clear that conservation objects are contextual and contingent (Clavir, 2009, p. 141). This dichotomy between the tangible and intangible features of a conservation object, however, has been successively overlooked in most conservation endeavours. Prior to the conservation decision-making, institutions usually identified the main stakeholders, with publics and communities being part of that sphere together with owners, artists, and conservators, among others. The decision-making process, however, does not engage with communities in practice. This situation is very problematic for the conservation of cultural heritage objects in general, but it becomes truly hazardous for the preservation of cultural heritage with strong intangible features, such as social artistic practices, ethnographic objects, public art, participatory or performance art or even built heritage, which necessarily involves strong cooperation with communities and artists. After all, to whom are conservators preserving cultural heritage? What is the purpose of conserving cultural heritage for “future generations” if “present generations” are not called to decide in that process? This paper attempts to reflect upon these questions through histories around two buildings in Lisbon that had relevant roles during the Portuguese dictatorship (1933-1974).
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:20:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-112a52cba2134b85817e4bf7deee9374
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2543-6422
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:20:40Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Lublin University of Technology
record_format Article
series Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
spelling doaj.art-112a52cba2134b85817e4bf7deee93742022-12-22T04:07:18ZengLublin University of TechnologyOchrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego2543-64222019-12-01810.35784/odk.10841084PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE HERITAGE PRESERVATIONHelia Marcal0Instituto de Historia da Arte, Universidade Nova de LisboaNowadays, heritage conservators are required to have not only a wide variety of technical but also social and human skills. The shift from a material-based conservation to an approach that focuses on subjects instead of objects (Muñoz Viñas, 2005, p. 147) is a structural approach in contemporary theories of conservation. This tendency towards subjectivity created many possibilities by exposing the multiple perspectives that surround a conservation object. At the same time, it made very clear that conservation objects are contextual and contingent (Clavir, 2009, p. 141). This dichotomy between the tangible and intangible features of a conservation object, however, has been successively overlooked in most conservation endeavours. Prior to the conservation decision-making, institutions usually identified the main stakeholders, with publics and communities being part of that sphere together with owners, artists, and conservators, among others. The decision-making process, however, does not engage with communities in practice. This situation is very problematic for the conservation of cultural heritage objects in general, but it becomes truly hazardous for the preservation of cultural heritage with strong intangible features, such as social artistic practices, ethnographic objects, public art, participatory or performance art or even built heritage, which necessarily involves strong cooperation with communities and artists. After all, to whom are conservators preserving cultural heritage? What is the purpose of conserving cultural heritage for “future generations” if “present generations” are not called to decide in that process? This paper attempts to reflect upon these questions through histories around two buildings in Lisbon that had relevant roles during the Portuguese dictatorship (1933-1974).https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/odk/article/view/1084Public engagementsustainabilitybuilt heritagesocial justice
spellingShingle Helia Marcal
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE HERITAGE PRESERVATION
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
Public engagement
sustainability
built heritage
social justice
title PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE HERITAGE PRESERVATION
title_full PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE HERITAGE PRESERVATION
title_fullStr PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE HERITAGE PRESERVATION
title_full_unstemmed PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE HERITAGE PRESERVATION
title_short PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE HERITAGE PRESERVATION
title_sort public engagement towards sustainable heritage preservation
topic Public engagement
sustainability
built heritage
social justice
url https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/odk/article/view/1084
work_keys_str_mv AT heliamarcal publicengagementtowardssustainableheritagepreservation