Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Blood cultures are a gold standard specific test for diagnosing many infections. However, the low yield may limit their usefulness, particularly in low-risk populations. This study was conducted to assess the utility of blood culture...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laupland Kevin B, Church Deirdre L, Gregson Daniel B
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-05-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/5/35
_version_ 1818540505950060544
author Laupland Kevin B
Church Deirdre L
Gregson Daniel B
author_facet Laupland Kevin B
Church Deirdre L
Gregson Daniel B
author_sort Laupland Kevin B
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Blood cultures are a gold standard specific test for diagnosing many infections. However, the low yield may limit their usefulness, particularly in low-risk populations. This study was conducted to assess the utility of blood cultures drawn from ambulatory outpatients.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Blood cultures drawn at community-based collection sites in the Calgary Health Region (population 1 million) in 2001 and 2002 were included in this study. These patients were analyzed by linkages to acute care health care databases for utilization of acute care facilities within 2 weeks of blood culture draw.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>3102 sets of cultures were drawn from 1732 ambulatory outpatients (annual rate = 89.4 per 100,000 population). Significant isolates were identified from 73 (2.4%) sets of cultures from 51 patients, including <it>Escherichia coli </it>in 18 (35%) and seven (14%) each of <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>and <it>Streptococcus pneumoniae</it>. Compared to patients with negative cultures, those with positive cultures were older (mean 49.6 vs. 40.1 years, p < 0.01), and more likely to subsequently receive care at a regional emergency department, outpatient antibiotic clinic, or hospital (35/51 vs. 296/1681, p < 0.0001). Of the 331 (19%) patients who received acute care treatment, those with positive cultures presented sooner after community culture draw (median 2 vs. 3 days, p < 0.01) and had longer median treatment duration (6 vs. 2 days, p < 0.01).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Blood cultures drawn in outpatient settings are uncommonly positive, but may define patients for increased intensity of therapy. Strategies to reduce utilization without excluding patients with positive cultures need to be developed for this patient population.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T21:56:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-112aee0ffeb94f27ac3c2f081bc24833
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2334
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T21:56:16Z
publishDate 2005-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj.art-112aee0ffeb94f27ac3c2f081bc248332022-12-22T00:49:18ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342005-05-01513510.1186/1471-2334-5-35Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatientsLaupland Kevin BChurch Deirdre LGregson Daniel B<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Blood cultures are a gold standard specific test for diagnosing many infections. However, the low yield may limit their usefulness, particularly in low-risk populations. This study was conducted to assess the utility of blood cultures drawn from ambulatory outpatients.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Blood cultures drawn at community-based collection sites in the Calgary Health Region (population 1 million) in 2001 and 2002 were included in this study. These patients were analyzed by linkages to acute care health care databases for utilization of acute care facilities within 2 weeks of blood culture draw.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>3102 sets of cultures were drawn from 1732 ambulatory outpatients (annual rate = 89.4 per 100,000 population). Significant isolates were identified from 73 (2.4%) sets of cultures from 51 patients, including <it>Escherichia coli </it>in 18 (35%) and seven (14%) each of <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>and <it>Streptococcus pneumoniae</it>. Compared to patients with negative cultures, those with positive cultures were older (mean 49.6 vs. 40.1 years, p < 0.01), and more likely to subsequently receive care at a regional emergency department, outpatient antibiotic clinic, or hospital (35/51 vs. 296/1681, p < 0.0001). Of the 331 (19%) patients who received acute care treatment, those with positive cultures presented sooner after community culture draw (median 2 vs. 3 days, p < 0.01) and had longer median treatment duration (6 vs. 2 days, p < 0.01).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Blood cultures drawn in outpatient settings are uncommonly positive, but may define patients for increased intensity of therapy. Strategies to reduce utilization without excluding patients with positive cultures need to be developed for this patient population.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/5/35
spellingShingle Laupland Kevin B
Church Deirdre L
Gregson Daniel B
Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
BMC Infectious Diseases
title Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
title_full Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
title_fullStr Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
title_full_unstemmed Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
title_short Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
title_sort blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/5/35
work_keys_str_mv AT lauplandkevinb bloodculturesinambulatoryoutpatients
AT churchdeirdrel bloodculturesinambulatoryoutpatients
AT gregsondanielb bloodculturesinambulatoryoutpatients