In vivo Confocal Microscopy Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Dry Eye Patients with Different Symptoms

Background: Dry eye patients suffer from all kinds of symptoms. Sometimes, the clinical signs evaluation does not disclose any obvious difference in routine examination; in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) is a powerful tool for ocular surface disease. This study aimed to clarify meibomian gland (MG)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui Zhao, Jing-Yao Chen, Yu-Qian Wang, Zhi-Rong Lin, Shen Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2016-01-01
Series:Chinese Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2016;volume=129;issue=21;spage=2617;epage=2622;aulast=Zhao
_version_ 1818517814655320064
author Hui Zhao
Jing-Yao Chen
Yu-Qian Wang
Zhi-Rong Lin
Shen Wang
author_facet Hui Zhao
Jing-Yao Chen
Yu-Qian Wang
Zhi-Rong Lin
Shen Wang
author_sort Hui Zhao
collection DOAJ
description Background: Dry eye patients suffer from all kinds of symptoms. Sometimes, the clinical signs evaluation does not disclose any obvious difference in routine examination; in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) is a powerful tool for ocular surface disease. This study aimed to clarify meibomian gland (MG) alterations in dry eye patients with different symptoms and to compare the findings using IVCM. Methods: A total of sixty patients were recruited, all subjected to Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Salisbury Eye Evaluation Questionnaire (SEEQ), and questionnaires for the assessment of dry eye symptoms before clinical sign examinations were given to the patients. Finally, IVCM was applied to observe MG's structure. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Spearman correlation analysis. The differences were statistically significant when P< 0.05. Results: In the severe symptom group, OSDI and SEEQ scores were significantly higher (P< 0.05) compared with the mild symptoms group. All other clinical sign examinations had no statistical difference in the two groups (P> 0.05). However, all the IVCM-observed data showed that patients with severe symptoms had more significant fibrosis in MG (acinar unit area 691.87 ± 182.01 μm2 for the severe, 992.17 ± 170.84 μm2 for the mild; P< 0.05) and severer decrease in the size of MG acinar units than those observed in patients with mild symptoms (MG acinar unit density [MGAUD] 70.08 ± 18.78 glands/mm2, MG acinar unit longest diameter [MGALD] 51.50 ± 15.51 μm, MG acinar unit shortest diameter [MGASD] 20.30 ± 11.85 μm for the severe, MGAUD 89.53 ± 39.88 glands/mm2, MGALD 81.57 ± 21.14 μm, MGASD 42.37 ± 14.55 μm for the mild;P< 0.05). Dry eye symptoms were negatively correlated with MG confocal microscopic parameters and positively correlated with conjunctival inflammatory cells and Langerhans cells (P< 0.05). Conclusions: IVCM application provides a strong support to differentiate dry eye patients with different symptoms: meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) plays a pivotal role in dry eye aggravation, and using IVCM to observe MG fibrosis, changes in size and density of MG as well as status of inflammation cells can help not only correctly diagnose the type and severity of dry eye, but also possibly prognosticate in routine eye examination in the occurrence of MGD.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T01:01:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-113084955cd9423588c4f5a1337b70d3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0366-6999
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T01:01:23Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Chinese Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-113084955cd9423588c4f5a1337b70d32022-12-22T01:26:18ZengWolters KluwerChinese Medical Journal0366-69992016-01-01129212617262210.4103/0366-6999.192782In vivo Confocal Microscopy Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Dry Eye Patients with Different SymptomsHui ZhaoJing-Yao ChenYu-Qian WangZhi-Rong LinShen WangBackground: Dry eye patients suffer from all kinds of symptoms. Sometimes, the clinical signs evaluation does not disclose any obvious difference in routine examination; in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) is a powerful tool for ocular surface disease. This study aimed to clarify meibomian gland (MG) alterations in dry eye patients with different symptoms and to compare the findings using IVCM. Methods: A total of sixty patients were recruited, all subjected to Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Salisbury Eye Evaluation Questionnaire (SEEQ), and questionnaires for the assessment of dry eye symptoms before clinical sign examinations were given to the patients. Finally, IVCM was applied to observe MG's structure. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Spearman correlation analysis. The differences were statistically significant when P< 0.05. Results: In the severe symptom group, OSDI and SEEQ scores were significantly higher (P< 0.05) compared with the mild symptoms group. All other clinical sign examinations had no statistical difference in the two groups (P> 0.05). However, all the IVCM-observed data showed that patients with severe symptoms had more significant fibrosis in MG (acinar unit area 691.87 ± 182.01 μm2 for the severe, 992.17 ± 170.84 μm2 for the mild; P< 0.05) and severer decrease in the size of MG acinar units than those observed in patients with mild symptoms (MG acinar unit density [MGAUD] 70.08 ± 18.78 glands/mm2, MG acinar unit longest diameter [MGALD] 51.50 ± 15.51 μm, MG acinar unit shortest diameter [MGASD] 20.30 ± 11.85 μm for the severe, MGAUD 89.53 ± 39.88 glands/mm2, MGALD 81.57 ± 21.14 μm, MGASD 42.37 ± 14.55 μm for the mild;P< 0.05). Dry eye symptoms were negatively correlated with MG confocal microscopic parameters and positively correlated with conjunctival inflammatory cells and Langerhans cells (P< 0.05). Conclusions: IVCM application provides a strong support to differentiate dry eye patients with different symptoms: meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) plays a pivotal role in dry eye aggravation, and using IVCM to observe MG fibrosis, changes in size and density of MG as well as status of inflammation cells can help not only correctly diagnose the type and severity of dry eye, but also possibly prognosticate in routine eye examination in the occurrence of MGD.http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2016;volume=129;issue=21;spage=2617;epage=2622;aulast=ZhaoConfocal Microscopy; Dry Eye; Meibomian Gland
spellingShingle Hui Zhao
Jing-Yao Chen
Yu-Qian Wang
Zhi-Rong Lin
Shen Wang
In vivo Confocal Microscopy Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Dry Eye Patients with Different Symptoms
Chinese Medical Journal
Confocal Microscopy; Dry Eye; Meibomian Gland
title In vivo Confocal Microscopy Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Dry Eye Patients with Different Symptoms
title_full In vivo Confocal Microscopy Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Dry Eye Patients with Different Symptoms
title_fullStr In vivo Confocal Microscopy Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Dry Eye Patients with Different Symptoms
title_full_unstemmed In vivo Confocal Microscopy Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Dry Eye Patients with Different Symptoms
title_short In vivo Confocal Microscopy Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Dry Eye Patients with Different Symptoms
title_sort in vivo confocal microscopy evaluation of meibomian gland dysfunction in dry eye patients with different symptoms
topic Confocal Microscopy; Dry Eye; Meibomian Gland
url http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2016;volume=129;issue=21;spage=2617;epage=2622;aulast=Zhao
work_keys_str_mv AT huizhao invivoconfocalmicroscopyevaluationofmeibomianglanddysfunctionindryeyepatientswithdifferentsymptoms
AT jingyaochen invivoconfocalmicroscopyevaluationofmeibomianglanddysfunctionindryeyepatientswithdifferentsymptoms
AT yuqianwang invivoconfocalmicroscopyevaluationofmeibomianglanddysfunctionindryeyepatientswithdifferentsymptoms
AT zhironglin invivoconfocalmicroscopyevaluationofmeibomianglanddysfunctionindryeyepatientswithdifferentsymptoms
AT shenwang invivoconfocalmicroscopyevaluationofmeibomianglanddysfunctionindryeyepatientswithdifferentsymptoms