Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in premenopausal women

In the past 20 years, clinicians have shifted away from relying solely on clinicopathologic indicators toward increasing use of multigene expression assays in guiding treatment decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Onco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shiliang Zhang, Kasey C. Fitzsimmons, Sara A. Hurvitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-03-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359221081077
_version_ 1818138701397491712
author Shiliang Zhang
Kasey C. Fitzsimmons
Sara A. Hurvitz
author_facet Shiliang Zhang
Kasey C. Fitzsimmons
Sara A. Hurvitz
author_sort Shiliang Zhang
collection DOAJ
description In the past 20 years, clinicians have shifted away from relying solely on clinicopathologic indicators toward increasing use of multigene expression assays in guiding treatment decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) is one of the most widely used multigene assays when considering indications for adjuvant chemotherapy, and guidelines have recently incorporated its use in women with early HR-positive HER2-negative breast cancer and up to three positive lymph nodes. While multiple retrospective and prospective clinical studies have demonstrated that most women with a low- to mid-range RS (0–25) can safely forgo chemotherapy, premenopausal women remain an important subgroup for which recommendations based on RS are ill-defined. The majority of patients included in clinical trials and retrospective analyses validating the use of RS have been postmenopausal women. In the subgroup of premenopausal women with HR-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, studies indicate that traditional clinicopathologic methods for assessing risk continue to be powerful tools when combined with RS to predict benefit from chemotherapy. This suggests that there is an element of uncaptured risk inherent to the premenopausal state that evades characterization by RS alone. This review describes the evidence that has supported the recommendation of RS in clinical guidelines, specifically focusing on data for its current use in premenopausal women. We review available data regarding the impact of the menstrual cycle on hormonally regulated gene expression, which may drive variations in the RS. Further research on the reliability and interpretation of the RS in the premenopausal subgroup is necessary and represents a gap in knowledge of how the RS should be applied in premenopausal women.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T10:16:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-113450424d884942a6a4e6608d40737b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1758-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T10:16:23Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-113450424d884942a6a4e6608d40737b2022-12-22T01:11:35ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology1758-83592022-03-011410.1177/17588359221081077Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in premenopausal womenShiliang ZhangKasey C. FitzsimmonsSara A. HurvitzIn the past 20 years, clinicians have shifted away from relying solely on clinicopathologic indicators toward increasing use of multigene expression assays in guiding treatment decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) is one of the most widely used multigene assays when considering indications for adjuvant chemotherapy, and guidelines have recently incorporated its use in women with early HR-positive HER2-negative breast cancer and up to three positive lymph nodes. While multiple retrospective and prospective clinical studies have demonstrated that most women with a low- to mid-range RS (0–25) can safely forgo chemotherapy, premenopausal women remain an important subgroup for which recommendations based on RS are ill-defined. The majority of patients included in clinical trials and retrospective analyses validating the use of RS have been postmenopausal women. In the subgroup of premenopausal women with HR-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, studies indicate that traditional clinicopathologic methods for assessing risk continue to be powerful tools when combined with RS to predict benefit from chemotherapy. This suggests that there is an element of uncaptured risk inherent to the premenopausal state that evades characterization by RS alone. This review describes the evidence that has supported the recommendation of RS in clinical guidelines, specifically focusing on data for its current use in premenopausal women. We review available data regarding the impact of the menstrual cycle on hormonally regulated gene expression, which may drive variations in the RS. Further research on the reliability and interpretation of the RS in the premenopausal subgroup is necessary and represents a gap in knowledge of how the RS should be applied in premenopausal women.https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359221081077
spellingShingle Shiliang Zhang
Kasey C. Fitzsimmons
Sara A. Hurvitz
Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in premenopausal women
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
title Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in premenopausal women
title_full Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in premenopausal women
title_fullStr Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in premenopausal women
title_full_unstemmed Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in premenopausal women
title_short Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in premenopausal women
title_sort oncotype dx recurrence score in premenopausal women
url https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359221081077
work_keys_str_mv AT shiliangzhang oncotypedxrecurrencescoreinpremenopausalwomen
AT kaseycfitzsimmons oncotypedxrecurrencescoreinpremenopausalwomen
AT saraahurvitz oncotypedxrecurrencescoreinpremenopausalwomen