The Xi Jinping administration’s desire for legitimacy: the strategic implication of its “new political party system”

ABSTRACTOn June 25th, 2021, the State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China issued a white paper entitled “China’s New Political Party System.” This document argues that the political systems of Western nations are “outdated” and emphasizes the superiority of the political sys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Naoko Eto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-07-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/24761028.2023.2197366
_version_ 1797844168167391232
author Naoko Eto
author_facet Naoko Eto
author_sort Naoko Eto
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTOn June 25th, 2021, the State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China issued a white paper entitled “China’s New Political Party System.” This document argues that the political systems of Western nations are “outdated” and emphasizes the superiority of the political system of “Chinese democracy,” as promoted by Xi Jinping. However, the Chinese government’s official English translation leaves out the context of “newness” and does not emphasize the harmfulness of the West’s “outdated” system. Why was the English version rewritten with little nuance? This could be because of a desire to avoid drawing international criticism for its plan to boost China’s “international discourse power” (国际话语权 in Chinese), which President Xi Jinping has sought to shore up. This paper argues that China’s “new political party system” was implemented as a political tool to formulate Xi Jinping’s new social science theory. Thus, it did not bring about any major changes to China’s political consultation system, in which “democratic parties” can consult with the Communist Party but basically cannot oppose or disagree. Additionally, the phrase “new political party system” was created amidst conflict around discourse power with the West and was an argument with strategic significance in its connection to foreign policy. Discussion of China’s political system is likely to become all the more important amidst the current structural conflict between the US and China.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:17:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1137331cdd55495eb7840dc19a49ba9d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2476-1028
2476-1036
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:17:59Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies
spelling doaj.art-1137331cdd55495eb7840dc19a49ba9d2023-04-19T09:53:44ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Contemporary East Asia Studies2476-10282476-10362022-07-0111221422810.1080/24761028.2023.2197366The Xi Jinping administration’s desire for legitimacy: the strategic implication of its “new political party system”Naoko Eto0Faculty of Law, Department of Political Science, Gakushuin University, Tokyo, JapanABSTRACTOn June 25th, 2021, the State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China issued a white paper entitled “China’s New Political Party System.” This document argues that the political systems of Western nations are “outdated” and emphasizes the superiority of the political system of “Chinese democracy,” as promoted by Xi Jinping. However, the Chinese government’s official English translation leaves out the context of “newness” and does not emphasize the harmfulness of the West’s “outdated” system. Why was the English version rewritten with little nuance? This could be because of a desire to avoid drawing international criticism for its plan to boost China’s “international discourse power” (国际话语权 in Chinese), which President Xi Jinping has sought to shore up. This paper argues that China’s “new political party system” was implemented as a political tool to formulate Xi Jinping’s new social science theory. Thus, it did not bring about any major changes to China’s political consultation system, in which “democratic parties” can consult with the Communist Party but basically cannot oppose or disagree. Additionally, the phrase “new political party system” was created amidst conflict around discourse power with the West and was an argument with strategic significance in its connection to foreign policy. Discussion of China’s political system is likely to become all the more important amidst the current structural conflict between the US and China.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/24761028.2023.2197366Discourse powerChinese political systemChinese “democracy”
spellingShingle Naoko Eto
The Xi Jinping administration’s desire for legitimacy: the strategic implication of its “new political party system”
Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies
Discourse power
Chinese political system
Chinese “democracy”
title The Xi Jinping administration’s desire for legitimacy: the strategic implication of its “new political party system”
title_full The Xi Jinping administration’s desire for legitimacy: the strategic implication of its “new political party system”
title_fullStr The Xi Jinping administration’s desire for legitimacy: the strategic implication of its “new political party system”
title_full_unstemmed The Xi Jinping administration’s desire for legitimacy: the strategic implication of its “new political party system”
title_short The Xi Jinping administration’s desire for legitimacy: the strategic implication of its “new political party system”
title_sort xi jinping administration s desire for legitimacy the strategic implication of its new political party system
topic Discourse power
Chinese political system
Chinese “democracy”
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/24761028.2023.2197366
work_keys_str_mv AT naokoeto thexijinpingadministrationsdesireforlegitimacythestrategicimplicationofitsnewpoliticalpartysystem
AT naokoeto xijinpingadministrationsdesireforlegitimacythestrategicimplicationofitsnewpoliticalpartysystem