Benford’s Law for Telemetry Data of Wildlife

Benford’s law (<i>BL</i>) specifies the expected digit distributions of data in social sciences, such as demographic or financial data. We focused on the first-digit distribution and hypothesized that it would apply to data on locations of animals freely moving in a natural habitat. We b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lasse Pröger, Paul Griesberger, Klaus Hackländer, Norbert Brunner, Manfred Kühleitner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Stats
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/4/4/55
_version_ 1797500482585886720
author Lasse Pröger
Paul Griesberger
Klaus Hackländer
Norbert Brunner
Manfred Kühleitner
author_facet Lasse Pröger
Paul Griesberger
Klaus Hackländer
Norbert Brunner
Manfred Kühleitner
author_sort Lasse Pröger
collection DOAJ
description Benford’s law (<i>BL</i>) specifies the expected digit distributions of data in social sciences, such as demographic or financial data. We focused on the first-digit distribution and hypothesized that it would apply to data on locations of animals freely moving in a natural habitat. We believe that animal movement in natural habitats may differ with respect to <i>BL</i> from movement in more restricted areas (e.g., game preserve). To verify the <i>BL</i>-hypothesis for natural habitats, during 2015–2018, we collected telemetry data of twenty individuals of wild red deer from an alpine region of Austria. For each animal, we recorded the distances between successive position records. Collecting these data for each animal in weekly logbooks resulted in 1132 samples of size 65 on average. The weekly logbook data displayed a <i>BL</i>-like distribution of the leading digits. However, the data did not follow <i>BL</i> perfectly; for 9% (99) of the 1132 weekly logbooks, the chi-square test refuted the <i>BL</i>-hypothesis. A Monte Carlo simulation confirmed that this deviation from <i>BL</i> could not be explained by spurious tests, where a deviation from <i>BL</i> occurred by chance.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:04:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1137d16f983e4f9bb7b3aae78453d676
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2571-905X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:04:28Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Stats
spelling doaj.art-1137d16f983e4f9bb7b3aae78453d6762023-11-23T10:35:03ZengMDPI AGStats2571-905X2021-11-014494394910.3390/stats4040055Benford’s Law for Telemetry Data of WildlifeLasse Pröger0Paul Griesberger1Klaus Hackländer2Norbert Brunner3Manfred Kühleitner4Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Mathematics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Mathematics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, AustriaBenford’s law (<i>BL</i>) specifies the expected digit distributions of data in social sciences, such as demographic or financial data. We focused on the first-digit distribution and hypothesized that it would apply to data on locations of animals freely moving in a natural habitat. We believe that animal movement in natural habitats may differ with respect to <i>BL</i> from movement in more restricted areas (e.g., game preserve). To verify the <i>BL</i>-hypothesis for natural habitats, during 2015–2018, we collected telemetry data of twenty individuals of wild red deer from an alpine region of Austria. For each animal, we recorded the distances between successive position records. Collecting these data for each animal in weekly logbooks resulted in 1132 samples of size 65 on average. The weekly logbook data displayed a <i>BL</i>-like distribution of the leading digits. However, the data did not follow <i>BL</i> perfectly; for 9% (99) of the 1132 weekly logbooks, the chi-square test refuted the <i>BL</i>-hypothesis. A Monte Carlo simulation confirmed that this deviation from <i>BL</i> could not be explained by spurious tests, where a deviation from <i>BL</i> occurred by chance.https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/4/4/55Benford’s law (<i>BL</i>)logbookhabitat useMonte Carlo simulationred deer (<i>Cervus elaphus</i>)telemetry
spellingShingle Lasse Pröger
Paul Griesberger
Klaus Hackländer
Norbert Brunner
Manfred Kühleitner
Benford’s Law for Telemetry Data of Wildlife
Stats
Benford’s law (<i>BL</i>)
logbook
habitat use
Monte Carlo simulation
red deer (<i>Cervus elaphus</i>)
telemetry
title Benford’s Law for Telemetry Data of Wildlife
title_full Benford’s Law for Telemetry Data of Wildlife
title_fullStr Benford’s Law for Telemetry Data of Wildlife
title_full_unstemmed Benford’s Law for Telemetry Data of Wildlife
title_short Benford’s Law for Telemetry Data of Wildlife
title_sort benford s law for telemetry data of wildlife
topic Benford’s law (<i>BL</i>)
logbook
habitat use
Monte Carlo simulation
red deer (<i>Cervus elaphus</i>)
telemetry
url https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/4/4/55
work_keys_str_mv AT lasseproger benfordslawfortelemetrydataofwildlife
AT paulgriesberger benfordslawfortelemetrydataofwildlife
AT klaushacklander benfordslawfortelemetrydataofwildlife
AT norbertbrunner benfordslawfortelemetrydataofwildlife
AT manfredkuhleitner benfordslawfortelemetrydataofwildlife