Treatment decisions for older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease

Abstract Dialysis initiation rates among older adults, aged 75 years or greater, are increasing at a faster rate than for younger age groups. Older adults with advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) typically lose renal function slowly, often suffer from significant comorbidity and thus may die...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven J. Rosansky, Jane Schell, Joseph Shega, Jennifer Scherer, Laurie Jacobs, Cecile Couchoud, Deidra Crews, Matthew McNabney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-06-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-017-0617-3
_version_ 1828771204423483392
author Steven J. Rosansky
Jane Schell
Joseph Shega
Jennifer Scherer
Laurie Jacobs
Cecile Couchoud
Deidra Crews
Matthew McNabney
author_facet Steven J. Rosansky
Jane Schell
Joseph Shega
Jennifer Scherer
Laurie Jacobs
Cecile Couchoud
Deidra Crews
Matthew McNabney
author_sort Steven J. Rosansky
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Dialysis initiation rates among older adults, aged 75 years or greater, are increasing at a faster rate than for younger age groups. Older adults with advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) typically lose renal function slowly, often suffer from significant comorbidity and thus may die from associated comorbidities before they require dialysis. A patient’s pattern of renal function loss over time in relation to their underlying comorbidities can serve as a guide to the probability of a future dialysis requirement. Most who start dialysis, initiate treatment “early”, at an estimated glomerulofiltration rate (eGFR) >10 ml/min/1.73 m2 and many initiate dialysis in hospital, often in association with an episode of acute renal failure. In the US older adults start dialysis at a mean e GFR of 12.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 20.6% die within six months of dialysis initiation. In both the acute in hospital and outpatient settings, many older adults appear to be initiating dialysis for non-specific, non-life threatening symptoms and clinical contexts. Observational data suggests that dialysis does not provide a survival benefit for older adults with poor mobility and high levels of comorbidity. To optimize the care of this population, early and repeat shared decision making conversations by health care providers, patients, and their families should consider the risks, burdens, and benefits of dialysis versus conservative management, as well as the patient specific symptoms and clinical situations that could justify dialysis initiation. The potential advantages and disadvantages of dialysis therapy should be considered in conjunction with each patient’s unique goals and priorities. In conclusion, when considering the morbidity and quality of life impact associated with dialysis, many older adults may prefer to delay dialysis until there is a definitive indication or may opt for conservative management without dialysis. This approach can incorporate all CKD treatments other than dialysis, provide psychosocial and spiritual support and active symptom management and may also incorporate a palliative care approach with less medical monitoring of lab parameters and more focus on the use of drug therapies directed to relief of a patient’s symptoms.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T14:21:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1138128c0d52480cacaaf795e381fcaf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2369
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T14:21:05Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Nephrology
spelling doaj.art-1138128c0d52480cacaaf795e381fcaf2022-12-22T01:02:53ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692017-06-0118111010.1186/s12882-017-0617-3Treatment decisions for older adults with advanced chronic kidney diseaseSteven J. Rosansky0Jane Schell1Joseph Shega2Jennifer Scherer3Laurie Jacobs4Cecile Couchoud5Deidra Crews6Matthew McNabney7Dorn Research Institute, WJBD VA HospitalSection of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh School of MedicineVITAS HealthcareDivision of Palliative Care and Division of Nephrology, NYU School of MedicineDepartment of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of MedicineREIN registry, Agence de la biomedicineDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Welch Center for Prevention Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical InstitutionsDivision of Geriatrics, Johns Hopkins UniversityAbstract Dialysis initiation rates among older adults, aged 75 years or greater, are increasing at a faster rate than for younger age groups. Older adults with advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) typically lose renal function slowly, often suffer from significant comorbidity and thus may die from associated comorbidities before they require dialysis. A patient’s pattern of renal function loss over time in relation to their underlying comorbidities can serve as a guide to the probability of a future dialysis requirement. Most who start dialysis, initiate treatment “early”, at an estimated glomerulofiltration rate (eGFR) >10 ml/min/1.73 m2 and many initiate dialysis in hospital, often in association with an episode of acute renal failure. In the US older adults start dialysis at a mean e GFR of 12.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 20.6% die within six months of dialysis initiation. In both the acute in hospital and outpatient settings, many older adults appear to be initiating dialysis for non-specific, non-life threatening symptoms and clinical contexts. Observational data suggests that dialysis does not provide a survival benefit for older adults with poor mobility and high levels of comorbidity. To optimize the care of this population, early and repeat shared decision making conversations by health care providers, patients, and their families should consider the risks, burdens, and benefits of dialysis versus conservative management, as well as the patient specific symptoms and clinical situations that could justify dialysis initiation. The potential advantages and disadvantages of dialysis therapy should be considered in conjunction with each patient’s unique goals and priorities. In conclusion, when considering the morbidity and quality of life impact associated with dialysis, many older adults may prefer to delay dialysis until there is a definitive indication or may opt for conservative management without dialysis. This approach can incorporate all CKD treatments other than dialysis, provide psychosocial and spiritual support and active symptom management and may also incorporate a palliative care approach with less medical monitoring of lab parameters and more focus on the use of drug therapies directed to relief of a patient’s symptoms.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-017-0617-3Older adultDialysisShared decisionConservative careComorbidityGlomerulofiltration rate
spellingShingle Steven J. Rosansky
Jane Schell
Joseph Shega
Jennifer Scherer
Laurie Jacobs
Cecile Couchoud
Deidra Crews
Matthew McNabney
Treatment decisions for older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease
BMC Nephrology
Older adult
Dialysis
Shared decision
Conservative care
Comorbidity
Glomerulofiltration rate
title Treatment decisions for older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease
title_full Treatment decisions for older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease
title_fullStr Treatment decisions for older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease
title_full_unstemmed Treatment decisions for older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease
title_short Treatment decisions for older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease
title_sort treatment decisions for older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease
topic Older adult
Dialysis
Shared decision
Conservative care
Comorbidity
Glomerulofiltration rate
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-017-0617-3
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenjrosansky treatmentdecisionsforolderadultswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT janeschell treatmentdecisionsforolderadultswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT josephshega treatmentdecisionsforolderadultswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT jenniferscherer treatmentdecisionsforolderadultswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT lauriejacobs treatmentdecisionsforolderadultswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT cecilecouchoud treatmentdecisionsforolderadultswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT deidracrews treatmentdecisionsforolderadultswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT matthewmcnabney treatmentdecisionsforolderadultswithadvancedchronickidneydisease