Are California Sea Lions (Zalophus californianus) Sensitive to the Attentional State of their Caretakers?

Human-animal relations appear in various contexts (homes, farms, zoos, aquatic parks, etc.) possibly favoring the emergence of the ability to understand heterospecific communication signals in several species. Studies show that dogs (Canis familiaris) have developed the ability to attribute attentio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie Penel, Fabienne Delfour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Animal Behavior and Cognition 2014-11-01
Series:Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/4/01.Penel_Delfour_Final_Final.pdf
_version_ 1818925750911238144
author Marie Penel
Fabienne Delfour
author_facet Marie Penel
Fabienne Delfour
author_sort Marie Penel
collection DOAJ
description Human-animal relations appear in various contexts (homes, farms, zoos, aquatic parks, etc.) possibly favoring the emergence of the ability to understand heterospecific communication signals in several species. Studies show that dogs (Canis familiaris) have developed the ability to attribute attention to humans, reading their body, head and gaze cues. Horses (Equus caballus) and other species including African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus) show this ability too. Here, we asked if California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) can discriminate the attentional state of their caretakers. Four sea lions were tested in three increasingly complex experiments requiring them to make a choice between an attentive versus an inattentive caretaker. The first test asked whether sea lions could attribute attention to a human facing them versus facing away. In the second test, the caretaker’s head orientation towards the sea lion served as the attentional cue. In the final test, the inattentive caretaker wore dark sunglasses. The results were heterogeneous and showed a higher rate of success than failure in the test 1, but the opposite in test 2. The results in the test 3 were not significant. Furthermore, the latency measures suggested that the subjects did not understand the tasks. It therefore appears that in the situation used here sea lions mainly focused their attention on the experimenter’s body orientation; the head did not seem to be a pertinent cue.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T02:46:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-114506a34f4d4e74be1b2843bd454572
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2372-5052
2372-4323
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T02:46:12Z
publishDate 2014-11-01
publisher Animal Behavior and Cognition
record_format Article
series Animal Behavior and Cognition
spelling doaj.art-114506a34f4d4e74be1b2843bd4545722022-12-21T19:56:10ZengAnimal Behavior and CognitionAnimal Behavior and Cognition2372-50522372-43232014-11-011443444110.12966/abc.11.01.2014Are California Sea Lions (Zalophus californianus) Sensitive to the Attentional State of their Caretakers?Marie PenelFabienne DelfourHuman-animal relations appear in various contexts (homes, farms, zoos, aquatic parks, etc.) possibly favoring the emergence of the ability to understand heterospecific communication signals in several species. Studies show that dogs (Canis familiaris) have developed the ability to attribute attention to humans, reading their body, head and gaze cues. Horses (Equus caballus) and other species including African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus) show this ability too. Here, we asked if California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) can discriminate the attentional state of their caretakers. Four sea lions were tested in three increasingly complex experiments requiring them to make a choice between an attentive versus an inattentive caretaker. The first test asked whether sea lions could attribute attention to a human facing them versus facing away. In the second test, the caretaker’s head orientation towards the sea lion served as the attentional cue. In the final test, the inattentive caretaker wore dark sunglasses. The results were heterogeneous and showed a higher rate of success than failure in the test 1, but the opposite in test 2. The results in the test 3 were not significant. Furthermore, the latency measures suggested that the subjects did not understand the tasks. It therefore appears that in the situation used here sea lions mainly focused their attention on the experimenter’s body orientation; the head did not seem to be a pertinent cue.http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/4/01.Penel_Delfour_Final_Final.pdfAttentionChoice taskGazeSea lionsZalophus californianus
spellingShingle Marie Penel
Fabienne Delfour
Are California Sea Lions (Zalophus californianus) Sensitive to the Attentional State of their Caretakers?
Animal Behavior and Cognition
Attention
Choice task
Gaze
Sea lions
Zalophus californianus
title Are California Sea Lions (Zalophus californianus) Sensitive to the Attentional State of their Caretakers?
title_full Are California Sea Lions (Zalophus californianus) Sensitive to the Attentional State of their Caretakers?
title_fullStr Are California Sea Lions (Zalophus californianus) Sensitive to the Attentional State of their Caretakers?
title_full_unstemmed Are California Sea Lions (Zalophus californianus) Sensitive to the Attentional State of their Caretakers?
title_short Are California Sea Lions (Zalophus californianus) Sensitive to the Attentional State of their Caretakers?
title_sort are california sea lions zalophus californianus sensitive to the attentional state of their caretakers
topic Attention
Choice task
Gaze
Sea lions
Zalophus californianus
url http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/4/01.Penel_Delfour_Final_Final.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mariepenel arecaliforniasealionszalophuscalifornianussensitivetotheattentionalstateoftheircaretakers
AT fabiennedelfour arecaliforniasealionszalophuscalifornianussensitivetotheattentionalstateoftheircaretakers