Comparative study on metal versus zirconium dioxide infrastructure manufacturing in prosthetic rehabilitation in the maxillary frontal zone
Prosthetic rehabilitation of the maxillary front teeth is an extremely laborious problem for the dental team, consisting of the dentist and the dental technician. If for the physiognomic component the most recommended materials are the ceramic masses, for the resistance substrate there are several v...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Amaltea Medical Publishing House
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | Romanian Journal of Medical Practice |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://rjmp.com.ro/articles/2022.3/RJMP_2022_3_Art-03.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797739595373215744 |
|---|---|
| author | Sergiu Drafta Viorel Perieanu Radu Costea Oana Eftene Mihai Burlibasa Raluca Maria Manea Florentina Caministeanu Mircea Carabela Ioana-Cristina Neagoe Raluca Costea Irina Adriana Beuran Nicoleta Maru |
| author_facet | Sergiu Drafta Viorel Perieanu Radu Costea Oana Eftene Mihai Burlibasa Raluca Maria Manea Florentina Caministeanu Mircea Carabela Ioana-Cristina Neagoe Raluca Costea Irina Adriana Beuran Nicoleta Maru |
| author_sort | Sergiu Drafta |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Prosthetic rehabilitation of the maxillary front teeth is an extremely laborious problem for the dental team, consisting of the dentist and the dental technician. If for the physiognomic component the most recommended materials are the ceramic masses, for the resistance substrate there are several variants. Conventional technologies using dental alloys and modern ones involving the use of zirconium dioxide can be used successfully in performing fixed prosthetic restorations in the maxillary frontal area, both options having both advantages and disadvantages, as we will describe in this material. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:59:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1164c10d1f3247d699acf813c80ea1f4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1842-8258 2069-6108 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:59:24Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | Amaltea Medical Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Romanian Journal of Medical Practice |
| spelling | doaj.art-1164c10d1f3247d699acf813c80ea1f42023-08-22T07:42:17ZengAmaltea Medical Publishing HouseRomanian Journal of Medical Practice1842-82582069-61082022-09-0117313814310.37897/RJMP.2022.3.3Comparative study on metal versus zirconium dioxide infrastructure manufacturing in prosthetic rehabilitation in the maxillary frontal zone Sergiu Drafta0Viorel Perieanu1Radu Costea2 Oana Eftene3Mihai Burlibasa4Raluca Maria Manea5 Florentina Caministeanu6Mircea Carabela7Ioana-Cristina Neagoe8Raluca Costea9Irina Adriana Beuran10 Nicoleta Maru11“Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania“Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania“Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania“Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania“Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania“Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania“Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, RomaniaPrivate practice Bucharest, RomaniaPrivate practice Bucharest, RomaniaPrivate practice Bucharest, RomaniaUniversity of Pitesti, RomaniaPrivate practice Bucharest, Romania“Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania“Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, RomaniaProsthetic rehabilitation of the maxillary front teeth is an extremely laborious problem for the dental team, consisting of the dentist and the dental technician. If for the physiognomic component the most recommended materials are the ceramic masses, for the resistance substrate there are several variants. Conventional technologies using dental alloys and modern ones involving the use of zirconium dioxide can be used successfully in performing fixed prosthetic restorations in the maxillary frontal area, both options having both advantages and disadvantages, as we will describe in this material.https://rjmp.com.ro/articles/2022.3/RJMP_2022_3_Art-03.pdfprosthetic restorationsinfrastructuredental alloyszirconium dioxide |
| spellingShingle | Sergiu Drafta Viorel Perieanu Radu Costea Oana Eftene Mihai Burlibasa Raluca Maria Manea Florentina Caministeanu Mircea Carabela Ioana-Cristina Neagoe Raluca Costea Irina Adriana Beuran Nicoleta Maru Comparative study on metal versus zirconium dioxide infrastructure manufacturing in prosthetic rehabilitation in the maxillary frontal zone Romanian Journal of Medical Practice prosthetic restorations infrastructure dental alloys zirconium dioxide |
| title | Comparative study on metal versus zirconium dioxide infrastructure manufacturing in prosthetic rehabilitation in the maxillary frontal zone |
| title_full | Comparative study on metal versus zirconium dioxide infrastructure manufacturing in prosthetic rehabilitation in the maxillary frontal zone |
| title_fullStr | Comparative study on metal versus zirconium dioxide infrastructure manufacturing in prosthetic rehabilitation in the maxillary frontal zone |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study on metal versus zirconium dioxide infrastructure manufacturing in prosthetic rehabilitation in the maxillary frontal zone |
| title_short | Comparative study on metal versus zirconium dioxide infrastructure manufacturing in prosthetic rehabilitation in the maxillary frontal zone |
| title_sort | comparative study on metal versus zirconium dioxide infrastructure manufacturing in prosthetic rehabilitation in the maxillary frontal zone |
| topic | prosthetic restorations infrastructure dental alloys zirconium dioxide |
| url | https://rjmp.com.ro/articles/2022.3/RJMP_2022_3_Art-03.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sergiudrafta comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone AT viorelperieanu comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone AT raducostea comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone AT oanaeftene comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone AT mihaiburlibasa comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone AT ralucamariamanea comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone AT florentinacaministeanu comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone AT mirceacarabela comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone AT ioanacristinaneagoe comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone AT ralucacostea comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone AT irinaadrianabeuran comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone AT nicoletamaru comparativestudyonmetalversuszirconiumdioxideinfrastructuremanufacturinginprostheticrehabilitationinthemaxillaryfrontalzone |