Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Recycled Asphalt Pavements: Determining Cost of Recycled Materials for an Urban Highway Section

Growing demand for road infrastructures and accompanying environmental footprint calls for the replacement of pavement materials with recycled options. The complexities in real-world usability are dependent upon project-specific characteristics and are affected by budgetary constraints of local gove...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Umair Hasan, Andrew Whyte, Hamad Al Jassmi, Aisha Hasan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:CivilEng
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/2/19
_version_ 1827661255037419520
author Umair Hasan
Andrew Whyte
Hamad Al Jassmi
Aisha Hasan
author_facet Umair Hasan
Andrew Whyte
Hamad Al Jassmi
Aisha Hasan
author_sort Umair Hasan
collection DOAJ
description Growing demand for road infrastructures and accompanying environmental footprint calls for the replacement of pavement materials with recycled options. The complexities in real-world usability are dependent upon project-specific characteristics and are affected by budgetary constraints of local governmental agencies, material applicability, and climatical conditions. This study conducts a comprehensive lifecycle cost analysis (LCCA) of an urban highway section “E10” in the hot Middle Eastern climate of Abu Dhabi, where virgin asphalt usage is dominant, using actual cost data under multiple scenarios and recycled construction waste (RCW) usage across aggregate layers and recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) across wearing, binder, and asphalt base courses. Blast furnace slag as partial cement replacement for road concrete works is also analysed. Impacts across all lifecycle stages from initial earthworks and construction to routine maintenance and operation were compared. Results found that cost of sustainable construction is lower. Cost reduction was highest for RAP and RCW usage, particularly when the usage was accumulated. The optimum cost scenario used 25% RCW in the sub-base, 80% RCW in the unbound base, 25% warm-mix asphalt (WMA) RAP in the asphalt base, 15% warm-mix RAP in the binder and wearing courses, and 65% slag for concrete roadworks and resulted in USD 2.6 million (15%) cost reduction over 30 years from 2015 to 2045.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:05:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-116a4efde48a45ac8dbb00688208b1f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-4109
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:05:55Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series CivilEng
spelling doaj.art-116a4efde48a45ac8dbb00688208b1f62023-11-23T16:07:17ZengMDPI AGCivilEng2673-41092022-04-013231633110.3390/civileng3020019Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Recycled Asphalt Pavements: Determining Cost of Recycled Materials for an Urban Highway SectionUmair Hasan0Andrew Whyte1Hamad Al Jassmi2Aisha Hasan3School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, AustraliaSchool of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, AustraliaEmirates Centre for Mobility Research, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab EmiratesEmirates Centre for Mobility Research, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab EmiratesGrowing demand for road infrastructures and accompanying environmental footprint calls for the replacement of pavement materials with recycled options. The complexities in real-world usability are dependent upon project-specific characteristics and are affected by budgetary constraints of local governmental agencies, material applicability, and climatical conditions. This study conducts a comprehensive lifecycle cost analysis (LCCA) of an urban highway section “E10” in the hot Middle Eastern climate of Abu Dhabi, where virgin asphalt usage is dominant, using actual cost data under multiple scenarios and recycled construction waste (RCW) usage across aggregate layers and recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) across wearing, binder, and asphalt base courses. Blast furnace slag as partial cement replacement for road concrete works is also analysed. Impacts across all lifecycle stages from initial earthworks and construction to routine maintenance and operation were compared. Results found that cost of sustainable construction is lower. Cost reduction was highest for RAP and RCW usage, particularly when the usage was accumulated. The optimum cost scenario used 25% RCW in the sub-base, 80% RCW in the unbound base, 25% warm-mix asphalt (WMA) RAP in the asphalt base, 15% warm-mix RAP in the binder and wearing courses, and 65% slag for concrete roadworks and resulted in USD 2.6 million (15%) cost reduction over 30 years from 2015 to 2045.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/2/19lifecycle cost analysishighwaysscenario analysesgranulated blast furnace slagrecycled asphalt pavements
spellingShingle Umair Hasan
Andrew Whyte
Hamad Al Jassmi
Aisha Hasan
Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Recycled Asphalt Pavements: Determining Cost of Recycled Materials for an Urban Highway Section
CivilEng
lifecycle cost analysis
highways
scenario analyses
granulated blast furnace slag
recycled asphalt pavements
title Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Recycled Asphalt Pavements: Determining Cost of Recycled Materials for an Urban Highway Section
title_full Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Recycled Asphalt Pavements: Determining Cost of Recycled Materials for an Urban Highway Section
title_fullStr Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Recycled Asphalt Pavements: Determining Cost of Recycled Materials for an Urban Highway Section
title_full_unstemmed Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Recycled Asphalt Pavements: Determining Cost of Recycled Materials for an Urban Highway Section
title_short Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Recycled Asphalt Pavements: Determining Cost of Recycled Materials for an Urban Highway Section
title_sort lifecycle cost analysis of recycled asphalt pavements determining cost of recycled materials for an urban highway section
topic lifecycle cost analysis
highways
scenario analyses
granulated blast furnace slag
recycled asphalt pavements
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/2/19
work_keys_str_mv AT umairhasan lifecyclecostanalysisofrecycledasphaltpavementsdeterminingcostofrecycledmaterialsforanurbanhighwaysection
AT andrewwhyte lifecyclecostanalysisofrecycledasphaltpavementsdeterminingcostofrecycledmaterialsforanurbanhighwaysection
AT hamadaljassmi lifecyclecostanalysisofrecycledasphaltpavementsdeterminingcostofrecycledmaterialsforanurbanhighwaysection
AT aishahasan lifecyclecostanalysisofrecycledasphaltpavementsdeterminingcostofrecycledmaterialsforanurbanhighwaysection