Spurious early ecological association suggesting BCG vaccination effectiveness for COVID-19

<h4>Background</h4> Several ecologic studies have suggested that the bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine may be protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection including a highly-cited published pre-print by Miller et al., finding that middle/high- and high-income countries that never had a u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jorge R. Ledesma, Peter Lurie, Rachel R. Yorlets, Garrison Daly, Stavroula Chrysanthopoulou, Mark N. Lurie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488757/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1798001315384655872
author Jorge R. Ledesma
Peter Lurie
Rachel R. Yorlets
Garrison Daly
Stavroula Chrysanthopoulou
Mark N. Lurie
author_facet Jorge R. Ledesma
Peter Lurie
Rachel R. Yorlets
Garrison Daly
Stavroula Chrysanthopoulou
Mark N. Lurie
author_sort Jorge R. Ledesma
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4> Several ecologic studies have suggested that the bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine may be protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection including a highly-cited published pre-print by Miller et al., finding that middle/high- and high-income countries that never had a universal BCG policy experienced higher COVID-19 burden compared to countries that currently have universal BCG vaccination policies. We provide a case study of the limitations of ecologic analyses by evaluating whether these early ecologic findings persisted as the pandemic progressed. <h4>Methods</h4> Similar to Miller et al., we employed Wilcoxon Rank Sum Tests to compare population medians in COVID-19 mortality, incidence, and mortality-to-incidence ratio between countries with universal BCG policies compared to those that never had such policies. We then computed Pearson’s r correlations to evaluate the association between year of BCG vaccination policy implementation and COVID-19 outcomes. We repeated these analyses for every month in 2020 subsequent to Miller et al.’s March 2020 analysis. <h4>Results</h4> We found that the differences in COVID-19 burden associated with BCG vaccination policies in March 2020 generally diminished in magnitude and usually lost statistical significance as the pandemic progressed. While six of nine analyses were statistically significant in March, only two were significant by the end of 2020. <h4>Discussion</h4> These results underscore the need for caution in interpreting ecologic studies, given their inherent methodological limitations, which can be magnified in the context of a rapidly evolving pandemic in which there is measurement error of both exposure and outcome status.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:34:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1171fcea1fd642a68667944fe77ec076
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:34:14Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-1171fcea1fd642a68667944fe77ec0762022-12-22T04:26:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01179Spurious early ecological association suggesting BCG vaccination effectiveness for COVID-19Jorge R. LedesmaPeter LurieRachel R. YorletsGarrison DalyStavroula ChrysanthopoulouMark N. Lurie<h4>Background</h4> Several ecologic studies have suggested that the bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine may be protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection including a highly-cited published pre-print by Miller et al., finding that middle/high- and high-income countries that never had a universal BCG policy experienced higher COVID-19 burden compared to countries that currently have universal BCG vaccination policies. We provide a case study of the limitations of ecologic analyses by evaluating whether these early ecologic findings persisted as the pandemic progressed. <h4>Methods</h4> Similar to Miller et al., we employed Wilcoxon Rank Sum Tests to compare population medians in COVID-19 mortality, incidence, and mortality-to-incidence ratio between countries with universal BCG policies compared to those that never had such policies. We then computed Pearson’s r correlations to evaluate the association between year of BCG vaccination policy implementation and COVID-19 outcomes. We repeated these analyses for every month in 2020 subsequent to Miller et al.’s March 2020 analysis. <h4>Results</h4> We found that the differences in COVID-19 burden associated with BCG vaccination policies in March 2020 generally diminished in magnitude and usually lost statistical significance as the pandemic progressed. While six of nine analyses were statistically significant in March, only two were significant by the end of 2020. <h4>Discussion</h4> These results underscore the need for caution in interpreting ecologic studies, given their inherent methodological limitations, which can be magnified in the context of a rapidly evolving pandemic in which there is measurement error of both exposure and outcome status.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488757/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Jorge R. Ledesma
Peter Lurie
Rachel R. Yorlets
Garrison Daly
Stavroula Chrysanthopoulou
Mark N. Lurie
Spurious early ecological association suggesting BCG vaccination effectiveness for COVID-19
PLoS ONE
title Spurious early ecological association suggesting BCG vaccination effectiveness for COVID-19
title_full Spurious early ecological association suggesting BCG vaccination effectiveness for COVID-19
title_fullStr Spurious early ecological association suggesting BCG vaccination effectiveness for COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Spurious early ecological association suggesting BCG vaccination effectiveness for COVID-19
title_short Spurious early ecological association suggesting BCG vaccination effectiveness for COVID-19
title_sort spurious early ecological association suggesting bcg vaccination effectiveness for covid 19
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488757/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT jorgerledesma spuriousearlyecologicalassociationsuggestingbcgvaccinationeffectivenessforcovid19
AT peterlurie spuriousearlyecologicalassociationsuggestingbcgvaccinationeffectivenessforcovid19
AT rachelryorlets spuriousearlyecologicalassociationsuggestingbcgvaccinationeffectivenessforcovid19
AT garrisondaly spuriousearlyecologicalassociationsuggestingbcgvaccinationeffectivenessforcovid19
AT stavroulachrysanthopoulou spuriousearlyecologicalassociationsuggestingbcgvaccinationeffectivenessforcovid19
AT marknlurie spuriousearlyecologicalassociationsuggestingbcgvaccinationeffectivenessforcovid19