Anidulafungin in the treatment of invasive fungal infections

Kathryn Sabol, Tawanda GumboUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USAAbstract: More antifungal agents have reached clinical use in the past two decades than at any other time. The echinocandins have been a welcome addition to this group, with the latest being anidulafungin. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathryn Sabol, Tawanda Gumbo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2008-03-01
Series:Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/anidulafungin-in-the-treatment-of-invasive-fungal-infections-a1294
_version_ 1818461543304527872
author Kathryn Sabol
Tawanda Gumbo
author_facet Kathryn Sabol
Tawanda Gumbo
author_sort Kathryn Sabol
collection DOAJ
description Kathryn Sabol, Tawanda GumboUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USAAbstract: More antifungal agents have reached clinical use in the past two decades than at any other time. The echinocandins have been a welcome addition to this group, with the latest being anidulafungin. There are several lines of evidence to support anidulafungin’s role as primary therapy for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic patients, and as alternative therapy to fluconazole in patients with esophageal candidiasis with azole intolerance or triazole-resistant Candida. Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic studies in animals have demonstrated superior efficacy, defined as maximal microbial kill, when compared to fluconazole, regardless of the fluconazole susceptibility of the Candida species. These studies, as well as dose-effect studies in patients, also support the currently recommended dose of anidulafungin. A well designed randomized controlled trial has demonstrated anidulafungin’s efficacy in patients with invasive candidiasis. In this paper, we argue that anidulafungin may be preferable to fluconazole for the treatment of candidemia. However, as of yet, the difference between anidulafungin and the other two licensed echinocandins as first-line therapy for invasive candidiasis is unclear. On the other hand, there is insufficient evidence as of yet to support first-line use of anidulafungin in patients with neutropenia or aspergillosis.Keywords: anidulafungin, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics, efficacy, candidiasis
first_indexed 2024-12-14T23:47:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-118380ad50c1404b89355ab8d817eedd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1176-6336
1178-203X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T23:47:49Z
publishDate 2008-03-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
spelling doaj.art-118380ad50c1404b89355ab8d817eedd2022-12-21T22:43:20ZengDove Medical PressTherapeutics and Clinical Risk Management1176-63361178-203X2008-03-012008Issue 17178Anidulafungin in the treatment of invasive fungal infectionsKathryn SabolTawanda GumboKathryn Sabol, Tawanda GumboUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USAAbstract: More antifungal agents have reached clinical use in the past two decades than at any other time. The echinocandins have been a welcome addition to this group, with the latest being anidulafungin. There are several lines of evidence to support anidulafungin’s role as primary therapy for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic patients, and as alternative therapy to fluconazole in patients with esophageal candidiasis with azole intolerance or triazole-resistant Candida. Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic studies in animals have demonstrated superior efficacy, defined as maximal microbial kill, when compared to fluconazole, regardless of the fluconazole susceptibility of the Candida species. These studies, as well as dose-effect studies in patients, also support the currently recommended dose of anidulafungin. A well designed randomized controlled trial has demonstrated anidulafungin’s efficacy in patients with invasive candidiasis. In this paper, we argue that anidulafungin may be preferable to fluconazole for the treatment of candidemia. However, as of yet, the difference between anidulafungin and the other two licensed echinocandins as first-line therapy for invasive candidiasis is unclear. On the other hand, there is insufficient evidence as of yet to support first-line use of anidulafungin in patients with neutropenia or aspergillosis.Keywords: anidulafungin, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics, efficacy, candidiasishttp://www.dovepress.com/anidulafungin-in-the-treatment-of-invasive-fungal-infections-a1294
spellingShingle Kathryn Sabol
Tawanda Gumbo
Anidulafungin in the treatment of invasive fungal infections
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
title Anidulafungin in the treatment of invasive fungal infections
title_full Anidulafungin in the treatment of invasive fungal infections
title_fullStr Anidulafungin in the treatment of invasive fungal infections
title_full_unstemmed Anidulafungin in the treatment of invasive fungal infections
title_short Anidulafungin in the treatment of invasive fungal infections
title_sort anidulafungin in the treatment of invasive fungal infections
url http://www.dovepress.com/anidulafungin-in-the-treatment-of-invasive-fungal-infections-a1294
work_keys_str_mv AT kathrynsabol anidulafungininthetreatmentofinvasivefungalinfections
AT tawandagumbo anidulafungininthetreatmentofinvasivefungalinfections