Using cluster analysis methods for multivariate mapping of traffic accidents

Many factors affect the occurrence of traffic accidents. The classification and mapping of the different attributes of the resulting accident are important for the prevention of accidents. Multivariate mapping is the visual exploration of multiple attributes using a map or data reduction technique....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Selvi Huseyin Zahit, Caglar Burak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2018-12-01
Series:Open Geosciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0060
_version_ 1818670713960136704
author Selvi Huseyin Zahit
Caglar Burak
author_facet Selvi Huseyin Zahit
Caglar Burak
author_sort Selvi Huseyin Zahit
collection DOAJ
description Many factors affect the occurrence of traffic accidents. The classification and mapping of the different attributes of the resulting accident are important for the prevention of accidents. Multivariate mapping is the visual exploration of multiple attributes using a map or data reduction technique. More than one attribute can be visually explored and symbolized using numerous statistical classification systems or data reduction techniques. In this sense, clustering analysis methods can be used for multivariate mapping. This study aims to compare the multivariate maps produced by the K-means method, K-medoids method, and Agglomerative and Divisive Hierarchical Clustering (AGNES) method, which among clustering analysis methods, with real data. The results from the study will suggest which clustering methods should be preferred in terms of multivariate mapping. The results show that the K-medoids method is more appropriate in terms of clustering success. Moreover, the aim is to reveal spatial similarities in traffic accidents according to the results of traffic accidents that occur in different years. For this aim, multivariate maps created from traffic accident data of two different years in Turkey are used. The methods are compared, and the use of the maps produced with these methods for risk management and planning is discussed. Analysis of the maps reveals significant similarities for both years.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T07:12:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11876854a612452ba7ca0f6f1865cab2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2391-5447
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T07:12:29Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Open Geosciences
spelling doaj.art-11876854a612452ba7ca0f6f1865cab22022-12-21T21:58:59ZengDe GruyterOpen Geosciences2391-54472018-12-0110177278110.1515/geo-2018-0060geo-2018-0060Using cluster analysis methods for multivariate mapping of traffic accidentsSelvi Huseyin Zahit0Caglar Burak1Necmettin Erbakan University Konya, Konya, TurkeyNecmettin Erbakan University Konya, Konya, TurkeyMany factors affect the occurrence of traffic accidents. The classification and mapping of the different attributes of the resulting accident are important for the prevention of accidents. Multivariate mapping is the visual exploration of multiple attributes using a map or data reduction technique. More than one attribute can be visually explored and symbolized using numerous statistical classification systems or data reduction techniques. In this sense, clustering analysis methods can be used for multivariate mapping. This study aims to compare the multivariate maps produced by the K-means method, K-medoids method, and Agglomerative and Divisive Hierarchical Clustering (AGNES) method, which among clustering analysis methods, with real data. The results from the study will suggest which clustering methods should be preferred in terms of multivariate mapping. The results show that the K-medoids method is more appropriate in terms of clustering success. Moreover, the aim is to reveal spatial similarities in traffic accidents according to the results of traffic accidents that occur in different years. For this aim, multivariate maps created from traffic accident data of two different years in Turkey are used. The methods are compared, and the use of the maps produced with these methods for risk management and planning is discussed. Analysis of the maps reveals significant similarities for both years.https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0060traffic accidentsmultivariate mappingdata miningcluster analysisvisualization
spellingShingle Selvi Huseyin Zahit
Caglar Burak
Using cluster analysis methods for multivariate mapping of traffic accidents
Open Geosciences
traffic accidents
multivariate mapping
data mining
cluster analysis
visualization
title Using cluster analysis methods for multivariate mapping of traffic accidents
title_full Using cluster analysis methods for multivariate mapping of traffic accidents
title_fullStr Using cluster analysis methods for multivariate mapping of traffic accidents
title_full_unstemmed Using cluster analysis methods for multivariate mapping of traffic accidents
title_short Using cluster analysis methods for multivariate mapping of traffic accidents
title_sort using cluster analysis methods for multivariate mapping of traffic accidents
topic traffic accidents
multivariate mapping
data mining
cluster analysis
visualization
url https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0060
work_keys_str_mv AT selvihuseyinzahit usingclusteranalysismethodsformultivariatemappingoftrafficaccidents
AT caglarburak usingclusteranalysismethodsformultivariatemappingoftrafficaccidents