Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteria

AbstractThe postmortem examination can be used as a means of quality control for clinical diagnoses. A retrospective study on 300 dogs and cats that had been admitted to a small animal intensive care unit was performed comparing the clinical and postmortem findings, using the Modified Goldman criter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanne Hugen, Nynke Ankringa, Joris Henricus Robben, Chiara Valtolina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Veterinary Quarterly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/01652176.2023.2233584
_version_ 1797391692842663936
author Sanne Hugen
Nynke Ankringa
Joris Henricus Robben
Chiara Valtolina
author_facet Sanne Hugen
Nynke Ankringa
Joris Henricus Robben
Chiara Valtolina
author_sort Sanne Hugen
collection DOAJ
description AbstractThe postmortem examination can be used as a means of quality control for clinical diagnoses. A retrospective study on 300 dogs and cats that had been admitted to a small animal intensive care unit was performed comparing the clinical and postmortem findings, using the Modified Goldman criteria. All patient files were reevaluated for clinical diagnoses and all postmortem material was reevaluated for pathological diagnoses. After this, the Modified Goldman criteria were applied to score the discrepancies between them, and factors associated with the occurrence of an undiagnosed major unexpected finding were analyzed. The postmortem examination revealed additional findings in 65% of the cases. Major discrepancies, defined as those affecting treatment and possibly outcome of the patient, were present in 21.3% of the cases. The most frequently missed diagnoses detected at necropsy were pneumonia of various etiologies, meningitis/meningoencephalitis, myocarditis and generalized vasculitis. A shorter ICU stay was associated with increased odds of a major discrepancy. Conditions affecting the urinary or gastrointestinal system were negatively associated with major discrepancy.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:36:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-118793f123cd471b8bac314baf668b50
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0165-2176
1875-5941
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T23:36:26Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Veterinary Quarterly
spelling doaj.art-118793f123cd471b8bac314baf668b502023-12-14T06:25:09ZengTaylor & Francis GroupVeterinary Quarterly0165-21761875-59412023-12-014311810.1080/01652176.2023.2233584Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteriaSanne Hugen0Nynke Ankringa1Joris Henricus Robben2Chiara Valtolina3Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsAbstractThe postmortem examination can be used as a means of quality control for clinical diagnoses. A retrospective study on 300 dogs and cats that had been admitted to a small animal intensive care unit was performed comparing the clinical and postmortem findings, using the Modified Goldman criteria. All patient files were reevaluated for clinical diagnoses and all postmortem material was reevaluated for pathological diagnoses. After this, the Modified Goldman criteria were applied to score the discrepancies between them, and factors associated with the occurrence of an undiagnosed major unexpected finding were analyzed. The postmortem examination revealed additional findings in 65% of the cases. Major discrepancies, defined as those affecting treatment and possibly outcome of the patient, were present in 21.3% of the cases. The most frequently missed diagnoses detected at necropsy were pneumonia of various etiologies, meningitis/meningoencephalitis, myocarditis and generalized vasculitis. A shorter ICU stay was associated with increased odds of a major discrepancy. Conditions affecting the urinary or gastrointestinal system were negatively associated with major discrepancy.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/01652176.2023.2233584PostmortemGoldman criteriaICUmisdiagnosesdiscrepancynecropsy
spellingShingle Sanne Hugen
Nynke Ankringa
Joris Henricus Robben
Chiara Valtolina
Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteria
Veterinary Quarterly
Postmortem
Goldman criteria
ICU
misdiagnoses
discrepancy
necropsy
title Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteria
title_full Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteria
title_fullStr Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteria
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteria
title_short Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteria
title_sort assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the modified goldman criteria
topic Postmortem
Goldman criteria
ICU
misdiagnoses
discrepancy
necropsy
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/01652176.2023.2233584
work_keys_str_mv AT sannehugen assessmentofmisdiagnosisinsmallanimalintensivecarepatientsusingthemodifiedgoldmancriteria
AT nynkeankringa assessmentofmisdiagnosisinsmallanimalintensivecarepatientsusingthemodifiedgoldmancriteria
AT jorishenricusrobben assessmentofmisdiagnosisinsmallanimalintensivecarepatientsusingthemodifiedgoldmancriteria
AT chiaravaltolina assessmentofmisdiagnosisinsmallanimalintensivecarepatientsusingthemodifiedgoldmancriteria