A randomized double-blinded comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to caudal ropivacaine in children for below umbilical surgery

Background: Alpha-2 adenoreceptors as an adjuvant to local anesthetic during caudal analgesia in children prolongs the duration of analgesia. This study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine when added to ropivacaine for caudal analgesia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ganapathi Mavuri, Priyanka Jain, Swastika Chakraborty, Sandeep Kumar Mucherla, Ashok Jadon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcsjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2468-6859;year=2017;volume=14;issue=4;spage=157;epage=161;aulast=Mavuri
_version_ 1828788335475163136
author Ganapathi Mavuri
Priyanka Jain
Swastika Chakraborty
Sandeep Kumar Mucherla
Ashok Jadon
author_facet Ganapathi Mavuri
Priyanka Jain
Swastika Chakraborty
Sandeep Kumar Mucherla
Ashok Jadon
author_sort Ganapathi Mavuri
collection DOAJ
description Background: Alpha-2 adenoreceptors as an adjuvant to local anesthetic during caudal analgesia in children prolongs the duration of analgesia. This study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine when added to ropivacaine for caudal analgesia in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. Methods: In a prospective study, Seventy-eight children received block with either 0.2% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg (Group R; n = 26) or 0.2% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg + 1 mcg/kg clonidine (Group RC; n = 26) or 0.2% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg + dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg (Group RD; n = 26). Results: Duration of analgesia was 7.15 ± 1.00 h in Group R, 11.57 ± 1.27 h in Group R + C, and 14.73 ± 1.53 h in Group R + D (P < 0.0001). One patient in Group R + D had vomiting and 1 patient in Group R had urinary retention which was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Addition of clonidine and dexmedetomidine to caudal ropivacaine significantly prolongs the duration of analgesia without adverse effects.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T00:50:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-118d44c7353f4683a82901ac1cc94bac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2468-6859
2408-7408
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T00:50:47Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-118d44c7353f4683a82901ac1cc94bac2022-12-22T00:44:01ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Clinical Sciences2468-68592408-74082017-01-0114415716110.4103/jcls.jcls_15_17A randomized double-blinded comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to caudal ropivacaine in children for below umbilical surgeryGanapathi MavuriPriyanka JainSwastika ChakrabortySandeep Kumar MucherlaAshok JadonBackground: Alpha-2 adenoreceptors as an adjuvant to local anesthetic during caudal analgesia in children prolongs the duration of analgesia. This study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine when added to ropivacaine for caudal analgesia in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. Methods: In a prospective study, Seventy-eight children received block with either 0.2% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg (Group R; n = 26) or 0.2% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg + 1 mcg/kg clonidine (Group RC; n = 26) or 0.2% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg + dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg (Group RD; n = 26). Results: Duration of analgesia was 7.15 ± 1.00 h in Group R, 11.57 ± 1.27 h in Group R + C, and 14.73 ± 1.53 h in Group R + D (P < 0.0001). One patient in Group R + D had vomiting and 1 patient in Group R had urinary retention which was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Addition of clonidine and dexmedetomidine to caudal ropivacaine significantly prolongs the duration of analgesia without adverse effects.http://www.jcsjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2468-6859;year=2017;volume=14;issue=4;spage=157;epage=161;aulast=MavuriAnalgesiacaudalclonidinedexmedetomidinefacelegactivitycry and consolability scorepostoperative periodropivacainesevoflurane
spellingShingle Ganapathi Mavuri
Priyanka Jain
Swastika Chakraborty
Sandeep Kumar Mucherla
Ashok Jadon
A randomized double-blinded comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to caudal ropivacaine in children for below umbilical surgery
Journal of Clinical Sciences
Analgesia
caudal
clonidine
dexmedetomidine
face
leg
activity
cry and consolability score
postoperative period
ropivacaine
sevoflurane
title A randomized double-blinded comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to caudal ropivacaine in children for below umbilical surgery
title_full A randomized double-blinded comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to caudal ropivacaine in children for below umbilical surgery
title_fullStr A randomized double-blinded comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to caudal ropivacaine in children for below umbilical surgery
title_full_unstemmed A randomized double-blinded comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to caudal ropivacaine in children for below umbilical surgery
title_short A randomized double-blinded comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to caudal ropivacaine in children for below umbilical surgery
title_sort randomized double blinded comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to caudal ropivacaine in children for below umbilical surgery
topic Analgesia
caudal
clonidine
dexmedetomidine
face
leg
activity
cry and consolability score
postoperative period
ropivacaine
sevoflurane
url http://www.jcsjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2468-6859;year=2017;volume=14;issue=4;spage=157;epage=161;aulast=Mavuri
work_keys_str_mv AT ganapathimavuri arandomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandclonidineasanadjuvanttocaudalropivacaineinchildrenforbelowumbilicalsurgery
AT priyankajain arandomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandclonidineasanadjuvanttocaudalropivacaineinchildrenforbelowumbilicalsurgery
AT swastikachakraborty arandomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandclonidineasanadjuvanttocaudalropivacaineinchildrenforbelowumbilicalsurgery
AT sandeepkumarmucherla arandomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandclonidineasanadjuvanttocaudalropivacaineinchildrenforbelowumbilicalsurgery
AT ashokjadon arandomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandclonidineasanadjuvanttocaudalropivacaineinchildrenforbelowumbilicalsurgery
AT ganapathimavuri randomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandclonidineasanadjuvanttocaudalropivacaineinchildrenforbelowumbilicalsurgery
AT priyankajain randomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandclonidineasanadjuvanttocaudalropivacaineinchildrenforbelowumbilicalsurgery
AT swastikachakraborty randomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandclonidineasanadjuvanttocaudalropivacaineinchildrenforbelowumbilicalsurgery
AT sandeepkumarmucherla randomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandclonidineasanadjuvanttocaudalropivacaineinchildrenforbelowumbilicalsurgery
AT ashokjadon randomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandclonidineasanadjuvanttocaudalropivacaineinchildrenforbelowumbilicalsurgery