Moth bean and tepary bean as green nitrogen sources in intensive winter wheat cropping systems

Use of cover crops have been suggested to increase agricultural sustainability by providing multiple ecosystems services. Replacing summer fallow with drought tolerant legumes could serve both as a cover and a green source of N for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and help mitigate economic and e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hardeep Singh, Brian K. Northup, Prasanna H. Gowda, Peter Omara, Gurjinder S. Baath, P.V. Vara Prasad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-03-01
Series:Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154323004453
_version_ 1827324626151145472
author Hardeep Singh
Brian K. Northup
Prasanna H. Gowda
Peter Omara
Gurjinder S. Baath
P.V. Vara Prasad
author_facet Hardeep Singh
Brian K. Northup
Prasanna H. Gowda
Peter Omara
Gurjinder S. Baath
P.V. Vara Prasad
author_sort Hardeep Singh
collection DOAJ
description Use of cover crops have been suggested to increase agricultural sustainability by providing multiple ecosystems services. Replacing summer fallow with drought tolerant legumes could serve both as a cover and a green source of N for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and help mitigate economic and environmental problems by increasing resilience of agroecosystems in the United States (US) Southern Great Plains (SGP). Field experiments were conducted in 2018 and 2019 at the USDA - ARS Oklahoma and Central Plains Agricultural Research Center near El Reno, OK. The overall objective of the study was to quantify the potential of two summer legumes, tepary bean [Phaseolus acutifolius (A.) Gray] and moth bean [Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal], as green sources of N for winter wheat production in comparison with soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. The PROC MIXED procedure of the SAS statistical software was used to analyze biomass production by legumes, their impacts on soil water, soil N and yield of winter wheat, and N transfer from green N biomass to following winter wheat. Green N crops did not differ in biomass production, but soybean provided 22 % and 40 % more N than tepary bean and moth bean, respectively. Soil water was reduced under all green N crops than summer fallow at termination of green N crops and wheat planting. Biomass of green N crops increased N content in soils at wheat planting. Grain yield of winter wheat was significantly higher under tepary bean (5295 kg ha−1) than soybean (4300 kg ha−1), moth bean (4560 kg ha−1) and the control treatment (4323 kg ha−1). Nitrogen recovery in wheat biomass was greater under moth bean and tepary bean compared to soybean. Both moth bean and tepary bean could serve as green sources of N for winter wheat in the US SGP.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T13:59:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11a1c52734664f0f9ace92a3d14e2e20
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-1543
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T13:59:45Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
spelling doaj.art-11a1c52734664f0f9ace92a3d14e2e202024-03-07T05:29:35ZengElsevierJournal of Agriculture and Food Research2666-15432024-03-0115100938Moth bean and tepary bean as green nitrogen sources in intensive winter wheat cropping systemsHardeep Singh0Brian K. Northup1Prasanna H. Gowda2Peter Omara3Gurjinder S. Baath4P.V. Vara Prasad5West Florida Research and Education Center, Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Jay, FL, 32565, USA; Corresponding author. 4253 Experiment Dr, Jay, FL, 32565, USA.United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, Oklahoma and Central Plains Agricultural Research Center, El Reno, OK, 73036, USAUnited States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, Southeast Area Branch, Stoneville, MS, 38776, USAWest Florida Research and Education Center, Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Jay, FL, 32565, USABlackland Research & Extension Center, Texas A&M University, Temple, TX, 76502, USADepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USAUse of cover crops have been suggested to increase agricultural sustainability by providing multiple ecosystems services. Replacing summer fallow with drought tolerant legumes could serve both as a cover and a green source of N for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and help mitigate economic and environmental problems by increasing resilience of agroecosystems in the United States (US) Southern Great Plains (SGP). Field experiments were conducted in 2018 and 2019 at the USDA - ARS Oklahoma and Central Plains Agricultural Research Center near El Reno, OK. The overall objective of the study was to quantify the potential of two summer legumes, tepary bean [Phaseolus acutifolius (A.) Gray] and moth bean [Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal], as green sources of N for winter wheat production in comparison with soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. The PROC MIXED procedure of the SAS statistical software was used to analyze biomass production by legumes, their impacts on soil water, soil N and yield of winter wheat, and N transfer from green N biomass to following winter wheat. Green N crops did not differ in biomass production, but soybean provided 22 % and 40 % more N than tepary bean and moth bean, respectively. Soil water was reduced under all green N crops than summer fallow at termination of green N crops and wheat planting. Biomass of green N crops increased N content in soils at wheat planting. Grain yield of winter wheat was significantly higher under tepary bean (5295 kg ha−1) than soybean (4300 kg ha−1), moth bean (4560 kg ha−1) and the control treatment (4323 kg ha−1). Nitrogen recovery in wheat biomass was greater under moth bean and tepary bean compared to soybean. Both moth bean and tepary bean could serve as green sources of N for winter wheat in the US SGP.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154323004453Cover cropsGreen manuresCrop rotationLegumesSoil water content
spellingShingle Hardeep Singh
Brian K. Northup
Prasanna H. Gowda
Peter Omara
Gurjinder S. Baath
P.V. Vara Prasad
Moth bean and tepary bean as green nitrogen sources in intensive winter wheat cropping systems
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Cover crops
Green manures
Crop rotation
Legumes
Soil water content
title Moth bean and tepary bean as green nitrogen sources in intensive winter wheat cropping systems
title_full Moth bean and tepary bean as green nitrogen sources in intensive winter wheat cropping systems
title_fullStr Moth bean and tepary bean as green nitrogen sources in intensive winter wheat cropping systems
title_full_unstemmed Moth bean and tepary bean as green nitrogen sources in intensive winter wheat cropping systems
title_short Moth bean and tepary bean as green nitrogen sources in intensive winter wheat cropping systems
title_sort moth bean and tepary bean as green nitrogen sources in intensive winter wheat cropping systems
topic Cover crops
Green manures
Crop rotation
Legumes
Soil water content
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154323004453
work_keys_str_mv AT hardeepsingh mothbeanandteparybeanasgreennitrogensourcesinintensivewinterwheatcroppingsystems
AT brianknorthup mothbeanandteparybeanasgreennitrogensourcesinintensivewinterwheatcroppingsystems
AT prasannahgowda mothbeanandteparybeanasgreennitrogensourcesinintensivewinterwheatcroppingsystems
AT peteromara mothbeanandteparybeanasgreennitrogensourcesinintensivewinterwheatcroppingsystems
AT gurjindersbaath mothbeanandteparybeanasgreennitrogensourcesinintensivewinterwheatcroppingsystems
AT pvvaraprasad mothbeanandteparybeanasgreennitrogensourcesinintensivewinterwheatcroppingsystems