How to design renewable energy support policies with imperfect carbon pricing?
Based on the emission trading scheme (ETS), this study built a design framework of renewable energy support policies (RES), which is employed to assess the interaction between RES and ETS. For RES, we consider two policy instruments: feed-in-tariff (FIT) and renewable portfolio standards (RPS). Base...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.958979/full |
| _version_ | 1811182706618269696 |
|---|---|
| author | Ye Wang Xiao Cui Weisheng Bu Li Li |
| author_facet | Ye Wang Xiao Cui Weisheng Bu Li Li |
| author_sort | Ye Wang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Based on the emission trading scheme (ETS), this study built a design framework of renewable energy support policies (RES), which is employed to assess the interaction between RES and ETS. For RES, we consider two policy instruments: feed-in-tariff (FIT) and renewable portfolio standards (RPS). Based on the partial equilibrium model, taking the case of China’s electricity market, this study quantitatively discusses the implementation effects of six different policy mix scenarios from three aspects: emission reduction, production of green electricity, and social welfare. According to the results, there were big differences among the implementation effects of different RES instruments based on ETS. The renewable subsidy policy, on the whole, is better than renewable portfolio standards in terms of emission reduction, but worse in terms of improving the production of green electricity. In addition, different from the renewable subsidy policy, the renewable portfolio standards can reduce social welfare. When the emission quota is eased, RES can be implemented to significantly improve social welfare. These simulation results inspire China for the design of effective energy policies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T09:35:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-11a2f9b7c1be4fd4960448cc531b78cb |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2296-665X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T09:35:11Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-11a2f9b7c1be4fd4960448cc531b78cb2022-12-22T04:31:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2022-10-011010.3389/fenvs.2022.958979958979How to design renewable energy support policies with imperfect carbon pricing?Ye Wang0Xiao Cui1Weisheng Bu2Li Li3Department of Management, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Management, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Management, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, ChinaBased on the emission trading scheme (ETS), this study built a design framework of renewable energy support policies (RES), which is employed to assess the interaction between RES and ETS. For RES, we consider two policy instruments: feed-in-tariff (FIT) and renewable portfolio standards (RPS). Based on the partial equilibrium model, taking the case of China’s electricity market, this study quantitatively discusses the implementation effects of six different policy mix scenarios from three aspects: emission reduction, production of green electricity, and social welfare. According to the results, there were big differences among the implementation effects of different RES instruments based on ETS. The renewable subsidy policy, on the whole, is better than renewable portfolio standards in terms of emission reduction, but worse in terms of improving the production of green electricity. In addition, different from the renewable subsidy policy, the renewable portfolio standards can reduce social welfare. When the emission quota is eased, RES can be implemented to significantly improve social welfare. These simulation results inspire China for the design of effective energy policies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.958979/fullcarbon pricingrenewable portfolio standardssocial welfarefeed-in tariffsemission trading scheme |
| spellingShingle | Ye Wang Xiao Cui Weisheng Bu Li Li How to design renewable energy support policies with imperfect carbon pricing? Frontiers in Environmental Science carbon pricing renewable portfolio standards social welfare feed-in tariffs emission trading scheme |
| title | How to design renewable energy support policies with imperfect carbon pricing? |
| title_full | How to design renewable energy support policies with imperfect carbon pricing? |
| title_fullStr | How to design renewable energy support policies with imperfect carbon pricing? |
| title_full_unstemmed | How to design renewable energy support policies with imperfect carbon pricing? |
| title_short | How to design renewable energy support policies with imperfect carbon pricing? |
| title_sort | how to design renewable energy support policies with imperfect carbon pricing |
| topic | carbon pricing renewable portfolio standards social welfare feed-in tariffs emission trading scheme |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.958979/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yewang howtodesignrenewableenergysupportpolicieswithimperfectcarbonpricing AT xiaocui howtodesignrenewableenergysupportpolicieswithimperfectcarbonpricing AT weishengbu howtodesignrenewableenergysupportpolicieswithimperfectcarbonpricing AT lili howtodesignrenewableenergysupportpolicieswithimperfectcarbonpricing |