Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the Restraint Scale and the Restrained Eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire

Despite being used interchangeably, different measures of restrained eating have been associated with different dietary behaviours. These differences have impeded replicability across the restraint literature and have made it difficult for researchers to interpret results and use the most appropriat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel C. Adams, Christopher D. Chambers, Natalia S. Lawrence
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2019-06-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190174
_version_ 1818302619617067008
author Rachel C. Adams
Christopher D. Chambers
Natalia S. Lawrence
author_facet Rachel C. Adams
Christopher D. Chambers
Natalia S. Lawrence
author_sort Rachel C. Adams
collection DOAJ
description Despite being used interchangeably, different measures of restrained eating have been associated with different dietary behaviours. These differences have impeded replicability across the restraint literature and have made it difficult for researchers to interpret results and use the most appropriate measure for their research. Across a total sample of 1731 participants, this study compared the Restraint Scale (RS), and its subscales, to the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) across several traits related to overeating. The aim was to explore potential differences between these two questionnaires so that we could help to identify the most suitable measure as a prescreening tool for eating-related interventions. Results revealed that although the two measures are highly correlated with one another (rs = 0.73–0.79), the RS was more strongly associated with external (rs = −0.07 to 0.11 versus −0.18 to −0.01) and disinhibited eating (rs = 0.46 versus 0.31), food craving (rs = 0.12–0.27 versus 0.02–0.13 and 0.22 versus −0.06) and body mass index (rs = 0.25–0.34 versus −0.13 to 0.15). The results suggest that, compared to the DEBQ, the RS is a more appropriate measure for identifying individuals who struggle the most to control their food intake.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T05:41:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11a71cabb79e4d1a9cb6303434380d5f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2054-5703
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T05:41:47Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher The Royal Society
record_format Article
series Royal Society Open Science
spelling doaj.art-11a71cabb79e4d1a9cb6303434380d5f2022-12-21T23:57:47ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032019-06-016610.1098/rsos.190174190174Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the Restraint Scale and the Restrained Eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour QuestionnaireRachel C. AdamsChristopher D. ChambersNatalia S. LawrenceDespite being used interchangeably, different measures of restrained eating have been associated with different dietary behaviours. These differences have impeded replicability across the restraint literature and have made it difficult for researchers to interpret results and use the most appropriate measure for their research. Across a total sample of 1731 participants, this study compared the Restraint Scale (RS), and its subscales, to the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) across several traits related to overeating. The aim was to explore potential differences between these two questionnaires so that we could help to identify the most suitable measure as a prescreening tool for eating-related interventions. Results revealed that although the two measures are highly correlated with one another (rs = 0.73–0.79), the RS was more strongly associated with external (rs = −0.07 to 0.11 versus −0.18 to −0.01) and disinhibited eating (rs = 0.46 versus 0.31), food craving (rs = 0.12–0.27 versus 0.02–0.13 and 0.22 versus −0.06) and body mass index (rs = 0.25–0.34 versus −0.13 to 0.15). The results suggest that, compared to the DEBQ, the RS is a more appropriate measure for identifying individuals who struggle the most to control their food intake.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190174restrained eatingdietary restraintassessment measuresfood cravingdisinhibited eatingbody mass index
spellingShingle Rachel C. Adams
Christopher D. Chambers
Natalia S. Lawrence
Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the Restraint Scale and the Restrained Eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire
Royal Society Open Science
restrained eating
dietary restraint
assessment measures
food craving
disinhibited eating
body mass index
title Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the Restraint Scale and the Restrained Eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire
title_full Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the Restraint Scale and the Restrained Eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire
title_fullStr Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the Restraint Scale and the Restrained Eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the Restraint Scale and the Restrained Eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire
title_short Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the Restraint Scale and the Restrained Eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire
title_sort do restrained eaters show increased bmi food craving and disinhibited eating a comparison of the restraint scale and the restrained eating scale of the dutch eating behaviour questionnaire
topic restrained eating
dietary restraint
assessment measures
food craving
disinhibited eating
body mass index
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190174
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelcadams dorestrainedeatersshowincreasedbmifoodcravinganddisinhibitedeatingacomparisonoftherestraintscaleandtherestrainedeatingscaleofthedutcheatingbehaviourquestionnaire
AT christopherdchambers dorestrainedeatersshowincreasedbmifoodcravinganddisinhibitedeatingacomparisonoftherestraintscaleandtherestrainedeatingscaleofthedutcheatingbehaviourquestionnaire
AT nataliaslawrence dorestrainedeatersshowincreasedbmifoodcravinganddisinhibitedeatingacomparisonoftherestraintscaleandtherestrainedeatingscaleofthedutcheatingbehaviourquestionnaire