Epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the Asia–Pacific region

Objective: To understand the global outbreak surveillance needs of stakeholders involved in epidemic response in selected countries and areas in the Asia–Pacific region in order to inform development of an epidemic observatory, Epi-watch. Methods: We designed an online, semi-structured stakeholder...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aurysia Hii, Abrar Ahmad Chughtai, Tambri Housen, Salanieta Saketa, Mohana Priya Kunasekaran, Feroza Sulaiman, NK Semara Yanti, Chandini Raina MacIntyre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific 2018-12-01
Series:Western Pacific Surveillance and Response
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ojs/index.php/wpsar/article/view/637/867
_version_ 1819299223468769280
author Aurysia Hii
Abrar Ahmad Chughtai
Tambri Housen
Salanieta Saketa
Mohana Priya Kunasekaran
Feroza Sulaiman
NK Semara Yanti
Chandini Raina MacIntyre
author_facet Aurysia Hii
Abrar Ahmad Chughtai
Tambri Housen
Salanieta Saketa
Mohana Priya Kunasekaran
Feroza Sulaiman
NK Semara Yanti
Chandini Raina MacIntyre
author_sort Aurysia Hii
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To understand the global outbreak surveillance needs of stakeholders involved in epidemic response in selected countries and areas in the Asia–Pacific region in order to inform development of an epidemic observatory, Epi-watch. Methods: We designed an online, semi-structured stakeholder questionnaire to collect information on global outbreak surveillance sources and limitations from participants who use epidemic intelligence and outbreak alert services in their work in government and nongovernment organizations in the Asia–Pacific region. Results: All respondents agreed that it was important to remain up to date with global outbreaks. The main reason cited for following global outbreak news was as an early warning for serious epidemics. Mainstream media and specialist Internet sources such as the World Health Organization (n = 54/91; 59%), the Program for Monitoring Emerging Diseases (ProMED)-mail (n = 45/91; 49%) and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (n = 31/91; 34%) were the most common sources for global outbreak news; rapid intelligence services such as HealthMap were less common (n = 9/91; 10%). Only 51% (n = 46/91) of respondents thought that their sources of outbreak news were timely and sufficient for their needs. Conclusion: For those who work in epidemic response, epidemic intelligence is important and widely used. Stakeholders are less aware of and less frequently use rapid sources such as HealthMap and rely more on validated but less timely traditional sources of disease surveillance. Users identified a need for more timely and reliable epidemic intelligence.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T05:42:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11ae67ec04324d23a84c840220ce567c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2094-7321
2094-7313
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T05:42:23Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific
record_format Article
series Western Pacific Surveillance and Response
spelling doaj.art-11ae67ec04324d23a84c840220ce567c2022-12-21T17:12:45ZengWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western PacificWestern Pacific Surveillance and Response2094-73212094-73132018-12-0194283610.5365/wpsar.2018.9.2.009Epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the Asia–Pacific regionAurysia Hii0Abrar Ahmad Chughtai1Tambri Housen2Salanieta Saketa3Mohana Priya Kunasekaran4Feroza Sulaiman5NK Semara Yanti6Chandini Raina MacIntyre7National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Australia.School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia.National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Australia.Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, Pacific Community, New Caledonia.School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia.School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia.School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia.School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia; College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, United States of America.Objective: To understand the global outbreak surveillance needs of stakeholders involved in epidemic response in selected countries and areas in the Asia–Pacific region in order to inform development of an epidemic observatory, Epi-watch. Methods: We designed an online, semi-structured stakeholder questionnaire to collect information on global outbreak surveillance sources and limitations from participants who use epidemic intelligence and outbreak alert services in their work in government and nongovernment organizations in the Asia–Pacific region. Results: All respondents agreed that it was important to remain up to date with global outbreaks. The main reason cited for following global outbreak news was as an early warning for serious epidemics. Mainstream media and specialist Internet sources such as the World Health Organization (n = 54/91; 59%), the Program for Monitoring Emerging Diseases (ProMED)-mail (n = 45/91; 49%) and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (n = 31/91; 34%) were the most common sources for global outbreak news; rapid intelligence services such as HealthMap were less common (n = 9/91; 10%). Only 51% (n = 46/91) of respondents thought that their sources of outbreak news were timely and sufficient for their needs. Conclusion: For those who work in epidemic response, epidemic intelligence is important and widely used. Stakeholders are less aware of and less frequently use rapid sources such as HealthMap and rely more on validated but less timely traditional sources of disease surveillance. Users identified a need for more timely and reliable epidemic intelligence.https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ojs/index.php/wpsar/article/view/637/867epidemicintelligencesurveillanceglobal outbreak alerts
spellingShingle Aurysia Hii
Abrar Ahmad Chughtai
Tambri Housen
Salanieta Saketa
Mohana Priya Kunasekaran
Feroza Sulaiman
NK Semara Yanti
Chandini Raina MacIntyre
Epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the Asia–Pacific region
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response
epidemic
intelligence
surveillance
global outbreak alerts
title Epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the Asia–Pacific region
title_full Epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the Asia–Pacific region
title_fullStr Epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the Asia–Pacific region
title_full_unstemmed Epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the Asia–Pacific region
title_short Epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the Asia–Pacific region
title_sort epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the asia pacific region
topic epidemic
intelligence
surveillance
global outbreak alerts
url https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ojs/index.php/wpsar/article/view/637/867
work_keys_str_mv AT aurysiahii epidemicintelligenceneedsofstakeholdersintheasiapacificregion
AT abrarahmadchughtai epidemicintelligenceneedsofstakeholdersintheasiapacificregion
AT tambrihousen epidemicintelligenceneedsofstakeholdersintheasiapacificregion
AT salanietasaketa epidemicintelligenceneedsofstakeholdersintheasiapacificregion
AT mohanapriyakunasekaran epidemicintelligenceneedsofstakeholdersintheasiapacificregion
AT ferozasulaiman epidemicintelligenceneedsofstakeholdersintheasiapacificregion
AT nksemarayanti epidemicintelligenceneedsofstakeholdersintheasiapacificregion
AT chandinirainamacintyre epidemicintelligenceneedsofstakeholdersintheasiapacificregion