A Cross-Linguistic Study of Individual Differences in Speech Planning

Although previous research has shown that there exist individual and cross-linguistic differences in planning strategies during language production, little is known about how such individual differences might vary depending on which language a speaker is planning. The present series of studies exami...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Swets, Susanne Fuchs, Jelena Krivokapić, Caterina Petrone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655516/full
_version_ 1818736932338794496
author Benjamin Swets
Susanne Fuchs
Jelena Krivokapić
Jelena Krivokapić
Caterina Petrone
author_facet Benjamin Swets
Susanne Fuchs
Jelena Krivokapić
Jelena Krivokapić
Caterina Petrone
author_sort Benjamin Swets
collection DOAJ
description Although previous research has shown that there exist individual and cross-linguistic differences in planning strategies during language production, little is known about how such individual differences might vary depending on which language a speaker is planning. The present series of studies examines individual differences in planning strategies exhibited by speakers of American English, French, and German. Participants were asked to describe images on a computer monitor while their eye movements were monitored. In addition, we measured participants' working memory capacity and speed of processing. The results indicate that in the present study, English and German were planned less incrementally (further in advance) prior to speech onset compared to French, which was planned more incrementally (not as far in advance). Crucially, speed of processing predicted the scope of planning for French speakers, but not for English or German speakers. These results suggest that the different planning strategies that are invoked by syntactic choices available in different languages are associated with the tendency for speakers to rely on different cognitive support systems as they plan sentences.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T00:45:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11b76393025d41b7a90ec4b1d187f6c4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T00:45:00Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-11b76393025d41b7a90ec4b1d187f6c42022-12-21T21:26:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-05-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.655516655516A Cross-Linguistic Study of Individual Differences in Speech PlanningBenjamin Swets0Susanne Fuchs1Jelena Krivokapić2Jelena Krivokapić3Caterina Petrone4Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI, United StatesLeibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Linguistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United StatesHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, United StatesCNRS, Aix Marseille Univ, LPL, Aix-en-Provence, FranceAlthough previous research has shown that there exist individual and cross-linguistic differences in planning strategies during language production, little is known about how such individual differences might vary depending on which language a speaker is planning. The present series of studies examines individual differences in planning strategies exhibited by speakers of American English, French, and German. Participants were asked to describe images on a computer monitor while their eye movements were monitored. In addition, we measured participants' working memory capacity and speed of processing. The results indicate that in the present study, English and German were planned less incrementally (further in advance) prior to speech onset compared to French, which was planned more incrementally (not as far in advance). Crucially, speed of processing predicted the scope of planning for French speakers, but not for English or German speakers. These results suggest that the different planning strategies that are invoked by syntactic choices available in different languages are associated with the tendency for speakers to rely on different cognitive support systems as they plan sentences.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655516/fullspeech planningincrementalitycrosslinguisticindividual differenceworking memoryspeed of processing
spellingShingle Benjamin Swets
Susanne Fuchs
Jelena Krivokapić
Jelena Krivokapić
Caterina Petrone
A Cross-Linguistic Study of Individual Differences in Speech Planning
Frontiers in Psychology
speech planning
incrementality
crosslinguistic
individual difference
working memory
speed of processing
title A Cross-Linguistic Study of Individual Differences in Speech Planning
title_full A Cross-Linguistic Study of Individual Differences in Speech Planning
title_fullStr A Cross-Linguistic Study of Individual Differences in Speech Planning
title_full_unstemmed A Cross-Linguistic Study of Individual Differences in Speech Planning
title_short A Cross-Linguistic Study of Individual Differences in Speech Planning
title_sort cross linguistic study of individual differences in speech planning
topic speech planning
incrementality
crosslinguistic
individual difference
working memory
speed of processing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655516/full
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminswets acrosslinguisticstudyofindividualdifferencesinspeechplanning
AT susannefuchs acrosslinguisticstudyofindividualdifferencesinspeechplanning
AT jelenakrivokapic acrosslinguisticstudyofindividualdifferencesinspeechplanning
AT jelenakrivokapic acrosslinguisticstudyofindividualdifferencesinspeechplanning
AT caterinapetrone acrosslinguisticstudyofindividualdifferencesinspeechplanning
AT benjaminswets crosslinguisticstudyofindividualdifferencesinspeechplanning
AT susannefuchs crosslinguisticstudyofindividualdifferencesinspeechplanning
AT jelenakrivokapic crosslinguisticstudyofindividualdifferencesinspeechplanning
AT jelenakrivokapic crosslinguisticstudyofindividualdifferencesinspeechplanning
AT caterinapetrone crosslinguisticstudyofindividualdifferencesinspeechplanning