Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies

Abstract Background Combining genomic data sets from multiple studies is advantageous to increase statistical power in studies where logistical considerations restrict sample size or require the sequential generation of data. However, significant technical heterogeneity is commonly observed across m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuqing Zhang, David F. Jenkins, Solaiappan Manimaran, W. Evan Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-07-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12859-018-2263-6
_version_ 1828480867880665088
author Yuqing Zhang
David F. Jenkins
Solaiappan Manimaran
W. Evan Johnson
author_facet Yuqing Zhang
David F. Jenkins
Solaiappan Manimaran
W. Evan Johnson
author_sort Yuqing Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Combining genomic data sets from multiple studies is advantageous to increase statistical power in studies where logistical considerations restrict sample size or require the sequential generation of data. However, significant technical heterogeneity is commonly observed across multiple batches of data that are generated from different processing or reagent batches, experimenters, protocols, or profiling platforms. These so-called batch effects often confound true biological relationships in the data, reducing the power benefits of combining multiple batches, and may even lead to spurious results in some combined studies. Therefore there is significant need for effective methods and software tools that account for batch effects in high-throughput genomic studies. Results Here we contribute multiple methods and software tools for improved combination and analysis of data from multiple batches. In particular, we provide batch effect solutions for cases where the severity of the batch effects is not extreme, and for cases where one high-quality batch can serve as a reference, such as the training set in a biomarker study. We illustrate our approaches and software in both simulated and real data scenarios. Conclusions We demonstrate the value of these new contributions compared to currently established approaches in the specified batch correction situations.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T07:46:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11c13fcbc012456e85f49cae87e51a9f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2105
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T07:46:43Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Bioinformatics
spelling doaj.art-11c13fcbc012456e85f49cae87e51a9f2022-12-22T01:15:27ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052018-07-0119111510.1186/s12859-018-2263-6Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studiesYuqing Zhang0David F. Jenkins1Solaiappan Manimaran2W. Evan Johnson3Division of Computational Biomedicine, Boston University School of MedicineDivision of Computational Biomedicine, Boston University School of MedicineDivision of Computational Biomedicine, Boston University School of MedicineDivision of Computational Biomedicine, Boston University School of MedicineAbstract Background Combining genomic data sets from multiple studies is advantageous to increase statistical power in studies where logistical considerations restrict sample size or require the sequential generation of data. However, significant technical heterogeneity is commonly observed across multiple batches of data that are generated from different processing or reagent batches, experimenters, protocols, or profiling platforms. These so-called batch effects often confound true biological relationships in the data, reducing the power benefits of combining multiple batches, and may even lead to spurious results in some combined studies. Therefore there is significant need for effective methods and software tools that account for batch effects in high-throughput genomic studies. Results Here we contribute multiple methods and software tools for improved combination and analysis of data from multiple batches. In particular, we provide batch effect solutions for cases where the severity of the batch effects is not extreme, and for cases where one high-quality batch can serve as a reference, such as the training set in a biomarker study. We illustrate our approaches and software in both simulated and real data scenarios. Conclusions We demonstrate the value of these new contributions compared to currently established approaches in the specified batch correction situations.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12859-018-2263-6Batch effectsEmpirical Bayes modelsData integrationBiomarker development
spellingShingle Yuqing Zhang
David F. Jenkins
Solaiappan Manimaran
W. Evan Johnson
Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies
BMC Bioinformatics
Batch effects
Empirical Bayes models
Data integration
Biomarker development
title Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies
title_full Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies
title_fullStr Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies
title_full_unstemmed Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies
title_short Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies
title_sort alternative empirical bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies
topic Batch effects
Empirical Bayes models
Data integration
Biomarker development
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12859-018-2263-6
work_keys_str_mv AT yuqingzhang alternativeempiricalbayesmodelsforadjustingforbatcheffectsingenomicstudies
AT davidfjenkins alternativeempiricalbayesmodelsforadjustingforbatcheffectsingenomicstudies
AT solaiappanmanimaran alternativeempiricalbayesmodelsforadjustingforbatcheffectsingenomicstudies
AT wevanjohnson alternativeempiricalbayesmodelsforadjustingforbatcheffectsingenomicstudies