Comparison of learning direct laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope: a randomized controlled trial

Objective Tracheal intubation using a direct laryngoscope is difficult to teach. The McGrath videolaryngoscope, a Macintosh-like device with a camera, can be used as a direct laryngoscope to educate novices under supervision using the screen. We compared the effect on Macintosh laryngoscopy skills f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: In Kyong Yi, Jihoon Hwang, Sang Kee Min, Gang Mee Lim, Yun Jeong Chae
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-05-01
Series:Journal of International Medical Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211016740
_version_ 1819045033159950336
author In Kyong Yi
Jihoon Hwang
Sang Kee Min
Gang Mee Lim
Yun Jeong Chae
author_facet In Kyong Yi
Jihoon Hwang
Sang Kee Min
Gang Mee Lim
Yun Jeong Chae
author_sort In Kyong Yi
collection DOAJ
description Objective Tracheal intubation using a direct laryngoscope is difficult to teach. The McGrath videolaryngoscope, a Macintosh-like device with a camera, can be used as a direct laryngoscope to educate novices under supervision using the screen. We compared the effect on Macintosh laryngoscopy skills following training with a McGrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope. Methods Thirty-seven participants were randomized into direct and indirect groups according to the training method using a McGrath videolaryngoscope. Participants attempted Macintosh direct laryngoscopy in normal and difficult airway scenarios. The primary endpoint was the intubation time, and the rate of successful intubation, dental trauma, and difficulty were secondary outcomes. Results The intubation time after education decreased significantly in both groups and was significantly shorter in the direct group than in the indirect group across time. The difficulty degree in the direct group was lower than that in the indirect group across time; however, the rate of dental trauma was not significantly different. Conclusion Both direct and indirect laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope improved the performance of Macintosh direct laryngoscopy in novices, while direct laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope demonstrated better educational effects than indirect laryngoscopy. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03471975).
first_indexed 2024-12-21T10:22:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11c229c59cf14581a40e659dbe624099
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1473-2300
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T10:22:08Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of International Medical Research
spelling doaj.art-11c229c59cf14581a40e659dbe6240992022-12-21T19:07:24ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of International Medical Research1473-23002021-05-014910.1177/03000605211016740Comparison of learning direct laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope: a randomized controlled trialIn Kyong YiJihoon HwangSang Kee MinGang Mee LimYun Jeong ChaeObjective Tracheal intubation using a direct laryngoscope is difficult to teach. The McGrath videolaryngoscope, a Macintosh-like device with a camera, can be used as a direct laryngoscope to educate novices under supervision using the screen. We compared the effect on Macintosh laryngoscopy skills following training with a McGrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope. Methods Thirty-seven participants were randomized into direct and indirect groups according to the training method using a McGrath videolaryngoscope. Participants attempted Macintosh direct laryngoscopy in normal and difficult airway scenarios. The primary endpoint was the intubation time, and the rate of successful intubation, dental trauma, and difficulty were secondary outcomes. Results The intubation time after education decreased significantly in both groups and was significantly shorter in the direct group than in the indirect group across time. The difficulty degree in the direct group was lower than that in the indirect group across time; however, the rate of dental trauma was not significantly different. Conclusion Both direct and indirect laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope improved the performance of Macintosh direct laryngoscopy in novices, while direct laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope demonstrated better educational effects than indirect laryngoscopy. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03471975).https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211016740
spellingShingle In Kyong Yi
Jihoon Hwang
Sang Kee Min
Gang Mee Lim
Yun Jeong Chae
Comparison of learning direct laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope: a randomized controlled trial
Journal of International Medical Research
title Comparison of learning direct laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of learning direct laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of learning direct laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of learning direct laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of learning direct laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of learning direct laryngoscopy using a mcgrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope a randomized controlled trial
url https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211016740
work_keys_str_mv AT inkyongyi comparisonoflearningdirectlaryngoscopyusingamcgrathvideolaryngoscopeasadirectversusindirectlaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jihoonhwang comparisonoflearningdirectlaryngoscopyusingamcgrathvideolaryngoscopeasadirectversusindirectlaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sangkeemin comparisonoflearningdirectlaryngoscopyusingamcgrathvideolaryngoscopeasadirectversusindirectlaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gangmeelim comparisonoflearningdirectlaryngoscopyusingamcgrathvideolaryngoscopeasadirectversusindirectlaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yunjeongchae comparisonoflearningdirectlaryngoscopyusingamcgrathvideolaryngoscopeasadirectversusindirectlaryngoscopearandomizedcontrolledtrial