Outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathy

BackgroundCochlear implantation (CI) outcomes in patients with auditory neuropathy (AN) are variable, which hampers patients’ decisions on CI.ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the outcomes of CI in individuals diagnosed with AN and to examine the various factors that may influence the effectiveness...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie Wu, Jiyue Chen, Zhiwei Ding, Jialin Fan, Qiuquan Wang, Pu Dai, Dongyi Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1281884/full
_version_ 1797629248270237696
author Jie Wu
Jiyue Chen
Zhiwei Ding
Jialin Fan
Qiuquan Wang
Pu Dai
Dongyi Han
author_facet Jie Wu
Jiyue Chen
Zhiwei Ding
Jialin Fan
Qiuquan Wang
Pu Dai
Dongyi Han
author_sort Jie Wu
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundCochlear implantation (CI) outcomes in patients with auditory neuropathy (AN) are variable, which hampers patients’ decisions on CI.ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the outcomes of CI in individuals diagnosed with AN and to examine the various factors that may influence the effectiveness of this intervention.MethodsA total of 75 patients diagnosed with AN were included in the study. The hearing threshold, the score of categories of auditory performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR), and speech audiometry were tested. Genetic testing was conducted by medical exome sequencing in 46 patients.ResultsAfter CI, the average aided hearing threshold for patients with prelingual and post-lingual onset was 38.25 ± 6.63 dB and 32.58 ± 9.26 dB, respectively; CAP score improved to 5.52 ± 1.64 (p < 0.001) and 6.00 ± 0.96 (p < 0.001), respectively; SIR score increased to 3.57 ± 1.22 (p < 0.001) and 4.15 ± 0.95 (p < 0.001), respectively. Maximum speech recognition ranged from 58 to 93% for prelingual onset patients and 43 to 98% for those with post-lingual onset. Speech outcomes of CI in cases with cochlear nerve (CN) deficiency were significantly poorer (p = 0.008). Molecular etiologies, including TWIST1, ACTG1, m.A7445G, and a copy-number variant (CNV) carrying ACTB, were related to AN here.ConclusionCI is a viable therapy option for patients with AN; CN deficiency might impact outcomes of CI.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T10:50:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11c243616e7d4a9c8a309d9f8683c059
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T10:50:38Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-11c243616e7d4a9c8a309d9f8683c0592023-11-13T18:10:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2023-11-011710.3389/fnins.2023.12818841281884Outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathyJie WuJiyue ChenZhiwei DingJialin FanQiuquan WangPu DaiDongyi HanBackgroundCochlear implantation (CI) outcomes in patients with auditory neuropathy (AN) are variable, which hampers patients’ decisions on CI.ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the outcomes of CI in individuals diagnosed with AN and to examine the various factors that may influence the effectiveness of this intervention.MethodsA total of 75 patients diagnosed with AN were included in the study. The hearing threshold, the score of categories of auditory performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR), and speech audiometry were tested. Genetic testing was conducted by medical exome sequencing in 46 patients.ResultsAfter CI, the average aided hearing threshold for patients with prelingual and post-lingual onset was 38.25 ± 6.63 dB and 32.58 ± 9.26 dB, respectively; CAP score improved to 5.52 ± 1.64 (p < 0.001) and 6.00 ± 0.96 (p < 0.001), respectively; SIR score increased to 3.57 ± 1.22 (p < 0.001) and 4.15 ± 0.95 (p < 0.001), respectively. Maximum speech recognition ranged from 58 to 93% for prelingual onset patients and 43 to 98% for those with post-lingual onset. Speech outcomes of CI in cases with cochlear nerve (CN) deficiency were significantly poorer (p = 0.008). Molecular etiologies, including TWIST1, ACTG1, m.A7445G, and a copy-number variant (CNV) carrying ACTB, were related to AN here.ConclusionCI is a viable therapy option for patients with AN; CN deficiency might impact outcomes of CI.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1281884/fullauditory neuropathycochlear implantationimpact factorcochlear nervegenetic testing
spellingShingle Jie Wu
Jiyue Chen
Zhiwei Ding
Jialin Fan
Qiuquan Wang
Pu Dai
Dongyi Han
Outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathy
Frontiers in Neuroscience
auditory neuropathy
cochlear implantation
impact factor
cochlear nerve
genetic testing
title Outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathy
title_full Outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathy
title_fullStr Outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathy
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathy
title_short Outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathy
title_sort outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathy
topic auditory neuropathy
cochlear implantation
impact factor
cochlear nerve
genetic testing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1281884/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jiewu outcomesofcochlearimplantationin75patientswithauditoryneuropathy
AT jiyuechen outcomesofcochlearimplantationin75patientswithauditoryneuropathy
AT zhiweiding outcomesofcochlearimplantationin75patientswithauditoryneuropathy
AT jialinfan outcomesofcochlearimplantationin75patientswithauditoryneuropathy
AT qiuquanwang outcomesofcochlearimplantationin75patientswithauditoryneuropathy
AT pudai outcomesofcochlearimplantationin75patientswithauditoryneuropathy
AT dongyihan outcomesofcochlearimplantationin75patientswithauditoryneuropathy