Spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence of tigers and leopards within a protected area in central India

<p>The global decline of large carnivore populations warrants scientific insights into intraguild relationships. Patterns of co-occurrence among sympatric predators are governed by their density, distribution, diet, activity overlaps, and behavioural strategies. Tigers are sympatric with leopa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. B. Chatterjee, K. Sankar, Y. V. Jhala, Q. Qureshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2023-02-01
Series:Web Ecology
Online Access:https://we.copernicus.org/articles/23/17/2023/we-23-17-2023.pdf
_version_ 1811173201291509760
author A. B. Chatterjee
K. Sankar
K. Sankar
Y. V. Jhala
Q. Qureshi
author_facet A. B. Chatterjee
K. Sankar
K. Sankar
Y. V. Jhala
Q. Qureshi
author_sort A. B. Chatterjee
collection DOAJ
description <p>The global decline of large carnivore populations warrants scientific insights into intraguild relationships. Patterns of co-occurrence among sympatric predators are governed by their density, distribution, diet, activity overlaps, and behavioural strategies. Tigers are sympatric with leopards across their distribution range, overlap substantially in their diet, and are both nocturnal. The subdominant leopard is believed to coexist with tigers via several mechanisms like spatial segregation, temporal avoidance, and differential prey selection. Investigation of spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence of tigers and leopards can provide insights on mechanisms that permit coexistence. We used camera trap-based photo captures of tigers and leopards in prey-rich (<span class="inline-formula">58.15±10.61</span> ungulates per <span class="inline-formula">km<sup>2</sup></span>) Pench Tiger Reserve to determine their spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence. Spatially explicit density estimates of tigers were approximately 5 per 100 <span class="inline-formula">km<sup>2</sup></span> and leopards were approximately 4.5 per 100 <span class="inline-formula">km<sup>2</sup></span> and remained stable over the years. This implies that both these co-predators are likely to attain carrying capacity within the study area. Areas with high tiger density had lower leopard density. Quantile regression analysis between tiger and leopard density at <span class="inline-formula">2×2</span> km grid showed that leopard density had a parabolic relationship with tiger density, initially increasing with tigers (<span class="inline-formula"><i>β</i>=0.393</span>; <span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i>=0.001</span>), stable at medium tiger density (<span class="inline-formula"><i>β</i>=0.13</span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i>=0.15</span>), and declining at high tiger densities (<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M10" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mi mathvariant="italic">β</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mn></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="51pt" height="12pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="6b61261063f034424f84978781f3f400"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="we-23-17-2023-ie00001.svg" width="51pt" height="12pt" src="we-23-17-2023-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i>&lt;0.001</span>). Both tigers and leopards were crepuscular in nature with no temporal segregation (<span class="inline-formula">Δ=89</span> %). Time lag of consecutive leopard photograph after a tiger capture ranged between 0.002 to 36.29 d. Leopard use of trails was not related to use by tigers. Our results suggest that leopards adjust their usage of space at fine scales to avoid confrontations with tigers. We also observed high temporal overlap and no spatio-temporal segregation between tigers and leopards, despite the two predators being nocturnal and having similar prey choices. The availability of ample prey within the study area is likely to be the driving factor of the co-occurrence of tigers and leopards within this dry deciduous habitat of central India.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:42:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11cc542dede44b4d978055044dc1c80d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2193-3081
1399-1183
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:42:50Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Web Ecology
spelling doaj.art-11cc542dede44b4d978055044dc1c80d2023-02-03T06:32:14ZengCopernicus PublicationsWeb Ecology2193-30811399-11832023-02-0123173410.5194/we-23-17-2023Spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence of tigers and leopards within a protected area in central IndiaA. B. Chatterjee0K. Sankar1K. Sankar2Y. V. Jhala3Q. Qureshi4Department of Population Management, Capture and Rehabilitation, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, IndiaDepartment of Population Management, Capture and Rehabilitation, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, IndiaEx-director, Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641108, IndiaDepartment of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, IndiaDepartment of Population Management, Capture and Rehabilitation, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India<p>The global decline of large carnivore populations warrants scientific insights into intraguild relationships. Patterns of co-occurrence among sympatric predators are governed by their density, distribution, diet, activity overlaps, and behavioural strategies. Tigers are sympatric with leopards across their distribution range, overlap substantially in their diet, and are both nocturnal. The subdominant leopard is believed to coexist with tigers via several mechanisms like spatial segregation, temporal avoidance, and differential prey selection. Investigation of spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence of tigers and leopards can provide insights on mechanisms that permit coexistence. We used camera trap-based photo captures of tigers and leopards in prey-rich (<span class="inline-formula">58.15±10.61</span> ungulates per <span class="inline-formula">km<sup>2</sup></span>) Pench Tiger Reserve to determine their spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence. Spatially explicit density estimates of tigers were approximately 5 per 100 <span class="inline-formula">km<sup>2</sup></span> and leopards were approximately 4.5 per 100 <span class="inline-formula">km<sup>2</sup></span> and remained stable over the years. This implies that both these co-predators are likely to attain carrying capacity within the study area. Areas with high tiger density had lower leopard density. Quantile regression analysis between tiger and leopard density at <span class="inline-formula">2×2</span> km grid showed that leopard density had a parabolic relationship with tiger density, initially increasing with tigers (<span class="inline-formula"><i>β</i>=0.393</span>; <span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i>=0.001</span>), stable at medium tiger density (<span class="inline-formula"><i>β</i>=0.13</span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i>=0.15</span>), and declining at high tiger densities (<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M10" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mi mathvariant="italic">β</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mn></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="51pt" height="12pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="6b61261063f034424f84978781f3f400"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="we-23-17-2023-ie00001.svg" width="51pt" height="12pt" src="we-23-17-2023-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i>&lt;0.001</span>). Both tigers and leopards were crepuscular in nature with no temporal segregation (<span class="inline-formula">Δ=89</span> %). Time lag of consecutive leopard photograph after a tiger capture ranged between 0.002 to 36.29 d. Leopard use of trails was not related to use by tigers. Our results suggest that leopards adjust their usage of space at fine scales to avoid confrontations with tigers. We also observed high temporal overlap and no spatio-temporal segregation between tigers and leopards, despite the two predators being nocturnal and having similar prey choices. The availability of ample prey within the study area is likely to be the driving factor of the co-occurrence of tigers and leopards within this dry deciduous habitat of central India.</p>https://we.copernicus.org/articles/23/17/2023/we-23-17-2023.pdf
spellingShingle A. B. Chatterjee
K. Sankar
K. Sankar
Y. V. Jhala
Q. Qureshi
Spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence of tigers and leopards within a protected area in central India
Web Ecology
title Spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence of tigers and leopards within a protected area in central India
title_full Spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence of tigers and leopards within a protected area in central India
title_fullStr Spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence of tigers and leopards within a protected area in central India
title_full_unstemmed Spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence of tigers and leopards within a protected area in central India
title_short Spatio-temporal patterns of co-occurrence of tigers and leopards within a protected area in central India
title_sort spatio temporal patterns of co occurrence of tigers and leopards within a protected area in central india
url https://we.copernicus.org/articles/23/17/2023/we-23-17-2023.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abchatterjee spatiotemporalpatternsofcooccurrenceoftigersandleopardswithinaprotectedareaincentralindia
AT ksankar spatiotemporalpatternsofcooccurrenceoftigersandleopardswithinaprotectedareaincentralindia
AT ksankar spatiotemporalpatternsofcooccurrenceoftigersandleopardswithinaprotectedareaincentralindia
AT yvjhala spatiotemporalpatternsofcooccurrenceoftigersandleopardswithinaprotectedareaincentralindia
AT qqureshi spatiotemporalpatternsofcooccurrenceoftigersandleopardswithinaprotectedareaincentralindia