The Scales of Injustice

This paper criticises four major approaches to criminal law – consequentialism, retributivism, abolitionism, and “mixed” pluralism – each of which, in its own fashion, affirms the celebrated emblem of the “scales of justice.” The argument is that there is a better way of dealing with the tensions th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Charles Blattberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2008-02-01
Series:The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
Online Access:https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/4536
_version_ 1797722112855638016
author Charles Blattberg
author_facet Charles Blattberg
author_sort Charles Blattberg
collection DOAJ
description This paper criticises four major approaches to criminal law – consequentialism, retributivism, abolitionism, and “mixed” pluralism – each of which, in its own fashion, affirms the celebrated emblem of the “scales of justice.” The argument is that there is a better way of dealing with the tensions that often arise between the various legal purposes than by merely balancing them against each other. It consists, essentially, of striving to genuinely reconcile those purposes, a goal which is shown to require taking a new, “patriotic” approach to law.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:42:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11e1f27ba63b4947b6b72fa91a34d8aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-5017
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:42:48Z
publishDate 2008-02-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
spelling doaj.art-11e1f27ba63b4947b6b72fa91a34d8aa2023-09-02T13:05:50ZengUniversity of WindsorThe Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice2561-50172008-02-0126110.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4536The Scales of InjusticeCharles Blattberg0Associate Professor of Political Philosophy, Department of Political Science, Université de Montréal; www.mapageweb.umontreal.ca/blattbec.This paper criticises four major approaches to criminal law – consequentialism, retributivism, abolitionism, and “mixed” pluralism – each of which, in its own fashion, affirms the celebrated emblem of the “scales of justice.” The argument is that there is a better way of dealing with the tensions that often arise between the various legal purposes than by merely balancing them against each other. It consists, essentially, of striving to genuinely reconcile those purposes, a goal which is shown to require taking a new, “patriotic” approach to law.https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/4536
spellingShingle Charles Blattberg
The Scales of Injustice
The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
title The Scales of Injustice
title_full The Scales of Injustice
title_fullStr The Scales of Injustice
title_full_unstemmed The Scales of Injustice
title_short The Scales of Injustice
title_sort scales of injustice
url https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/4536
work_keys_str_mv AT charlesblattberg thescalesofinjustice
AT charlesblattberg scalesofinjustice