Experimental comparison of altitudes with modern geodetic methods

Levelling is one of the most important geodesic works in construction and other interventions in space. Mostly, it is used for the needs of the altitude presentations of the terrain, to determine shifts, to determine the height of the object, and for various precise laboratory and scientific researc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kovačič Boštjan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/36/e3sconf_spbwosce2019_01030.pdf
_version_ 1818912366174142464
author Kovačič Boštjan
author_facet Kovačič Boštjan
author_sort Kovačič Boštjan
collection DOAJ
description Levelling is one of the most important geodesic works in construction and other interventions in space. Mostly, it is used for the needs of the altitude presentations of the terrain, to determine shifts, to determine the height of the object, and for various precise laboratory and scientific researches. When determining the shifts, the values are confirmed with the results of levelling, and deformations are calculated. There are a lot of methods to determine height differences; which one will be used, depends on the complexity of the works. Recently, the GNSS method is mostly used. It offers 2D positionally reliable results, whereas the vertical component does not provide reliable results. For this purpose, a series of tests and GNSS-measurements analysis were performed at our institution, which is also presented in the article as the GNSS-measurements analysis in comparison to the results obtained with the robotic total station of accuracy 0,5ˇ. Prior to the experiment, a temporal GNSS data analysis based on an individual axis and with a different way of data processing was carried out. The planning of GNSS-measurements for the needs of more demanding measurements is emphasised. To improve the determination of the vertical component, the data capture with GNSS method was increased from 10 Hz to 100 Hz, which partly improved the final values and is presented in the study.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T23:13:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11e219660d4141df9f736f1efa2c03e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-1242
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T23:13:27Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series E3S Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-11e219660d4141df9f736f1efa2c03e82022-12-21T20:02:09ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422019-01-011100103010.1051/e3sconf/201911001030e3sconf_spbwosce2019_01030Experimental comparison of altitudes with modern geodetic methodsKovačič Boštjan0University of MariborLevelling is one of the most important geodesic works in construction and other interventions in space. Mostly, it is used for the needs of the altitude presentations of the terrain, to determine shifts, to determine the height of the object, and for various precise laboratory and scientific researches. When determining the shifts, the values are confirmed with the results of levelling, and deformations are calculated. There are a lot of methods to determine height differences; which one will be used, depends on the complexity of the works. Recently, the GNSS method is mostly used. It offers 2D positionally reliable results, whereas the vertical component does not provide reliable results. For this purpose, a series of tests and GNSS-measurements analysis were performed at our institution, which is also presented in the article as the GNSS-measurements analysis in comparison to the results obtained with the robotic total station of accuracy 0,5ˇ. Prior to the experiment, a temporal GNSS data analysis based on an individual axis and with a different way of data processing was carried out. The planning of GNSS-measurements for the needs of more demanding measurements is emphasised. To improve the determination of the vertical component, the data capture with GNSS method was increased from 10 Hz to 100 Hz, which partly improved the final values and is presented in the study.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/36/e3sconf_spbwosce2019_01030.pdf
spellingShingle Kovačič Boštjan
Experimental comparison of altitudes with modern geodetic methods
E3S Web of Conferences
title Experimental comparison of altitudes with modern geodetic methods
title_full Experimental comparison of altitudes with modern geodetic methods
title_fullStr Experimental comparison of altitudes with modern geodetic methods
title_full_unstemmed Experimental comparison of altitudes with modern geodetic methods
title_short Experimental comparison of altitudes with modern geodetic methods
title_sort experimental comparison of altitudes with modern geodetic methods
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/36/e3sconf_spbwosce2019_01030.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kovacicbostjan experimentalcomparisonofaltitudeswithmoderngeodeticmethods