Systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in Uganda

BackgroundIn many parts of the world, medical devices and the processes of their development are tightly regulated. However, the current regulatory landscape in Uganda like other developing countries is weak and poorly defined, which creates significant barriers to innovation, clinical evaluation, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charles Norman Mpaata, Brian Matovu, Mercy Takuwa, Noah Kiwanuka, Steff Lewis, John Norrie, Sam Ononge, Sharon Tuck, Maria Wolters, Marc Demulliez, Robert T. Ssekitoleko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Medical Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmedt.2022.1054120/full
_version_ 1828056430806040576
author Charles Norman Mpaata
Brian Matovu
Mercy Takuwa
Noah Kiwanuka
Steff Lewis
John Norrie
Sam Ononge
Sharon Tuck
Maria Wolters
Marc Demulliez
Robert T. Ssekitoleko
author_facet Charles Norman Mpaata
Brian Matovu
Mercy Takuwa
Noah Kiwanuka
Steff Lewis
John Norrie
Sam Ononge
Sharon Tuck
Maria Wolters
Marc Demulliez
Robert T. Ssekitoleko
author_sort Charles Norman Mpaata
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundIn many parts of the world, medical devices and the processes of their development are tightly regulated. However, the current regulatory landscape in Uganda like other developing countries is weak and poorly defined, which creates significant barriers to innovation, clinical evaluation, and translation of medical devices.AimTo evaluate current knowledge, systems and infrastructure for medical devices regulation and innovation in Uganda.MethodsA mixed methods study design using the methods triangulation strategy was employed in this study. Data of equal weight were collected sequentially. First, a digital structured questionnaire was sent out to innovators to establish individual knowledge and experience with medical device innovation and regulation. Then, a single focus group discussion involving both medical device innovators and regulators to collect data about the current regulatory practices for medical devices in Uganda. Univariate and bivariate analysis was done for the quantitative data to summarize results in graphs and tables. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Ethical review and approval were obtained from the Makerere University School of Biomedical Sciences, Research and Ethics Committee, and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology.ResultsA total of 47 innovators responded to the questionnaire. 14 respondents were excluded since they were not medical device innovators. Majority (76%) of individuals had been innovators for more than a year, held a bachelor's degree with a background in Engineering and applied sciences, and worked in an academic research institute. 22 of the 33 medical device innovators had stopped working on their innovations and had stalled at the proof-of-concept stage. Insufficient funding, inadequate technical expertise and confusing regulatory landscape were major challenges to innovation. The two themes that emerged from the discussion were “developing standards for medical devices regulation” and “implementation of regulations in practical processes”. Legal limitations, lengthy processes, and low demand were identified as challenges to developing medical device regulations.ConclusionsEfforts have been taken by government to create a pathway for medical device innovations to be translated to the market. More work needs to be done to coordinate efforts among stakeholders to build effective medical device regulations in Uganda.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:55:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11e3a99b9a8549468896dff61d39566c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-3129
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:55:12Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medical Technology
spelling doaj.art-11e3a99b9a8549468896dff61d39566c2023-01-23T05:56:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medical Technology2673-31292023-01-01410.3389/fmedt.2022.10541201054120Systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in UgandaCharles Norman Mpaata0Brian Matovu1Mercy Takuwa2Noah Kiwanuka3Steff Lewis4John Norrie5Sam Ononge6Sharon Tuck7Maria Wolters8Marc Demulliez9Robert T. Ssekitoleko10Biomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, UgandaBiomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, UgandaBiomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, UgandaClinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, UgandaUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, UgandaUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomInformatics Forum, School of Informatics, College of Science and Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomSchool of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United KingdomBiomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, UgandaBackgroundIn many parts of the world, medical devices and the processes of their development are tightly regulated. However, the current regulatory landscape in Uganda like other developing countries is weak and poorly defined, which creates significant barriers to innovation, clinical evaluation, and translation of medical devices.AimTo evaluate current knowledge, systems and infrastructure for medical devices regulation and innovation in Uganda.MethodsA mixed methods study design using the methods triangulation strategy was employed in this study. Data of equal weight were collected sequentially. First, a digital structured questionnaire was sent out to innovators to establish individual knowledge and experience with medical device innovation and regulation. Then, a single focus group discussion involving both medical device innovators and regulators to collect data about the current regulatory practices for medical devices in Uganda. Univariate and bivariate analysis was done for the quantitative data to summarize results in graphs and tables. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Ethical review and approval were obtained from the Makerere University School of Biomedical Sciences, Research and Ethics Committee, and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology.ResultsA total of 47 innovators responded to the questionnaire. 14 respondents were excluded since they were not medical device innovators. Majority (76%) of individuals had been innovators for more than a year, held a bachelor's degree with a background in Engineering and applied sciences, and worked in an academic research institute. 22 of the 33 medical device innovators had stopped working on their innovations and had stalled at the proof-of-concept stage. Insufficient funding, inadequate technical expertise and confusing regulatory landscape were major challenges to innovation. The two themes that emerged from the discussion were “developing standards for medical devices regulation” and “implementation of regulations in practical processes”. Legal limitations, lengthy processes, and low demand were identified as challenges to developing medical device regulations.ConclusionsEfforts have been taken by government to create a pathway for medical device innovations to be translated to the market. More work needs to be done to coordinate efforts among stakeholders to build effective medical device regulations in Uganda.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmedt.2022.1054120/fullmedical devicesmedical innovationmedical devices regulationsclinical evaluationmedical device standardsregulatory pathway
spellingShingle Charles Norman Mpaata
Brian Matovu
Mercy Takuwa
Noah Kiwanuka
Steff Lewis
John Norrie
Sam Ononge
Sharon Tuck
Maria Wolters
Marc Demulliez
Robert T. Ssekitoleko
Systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in Uganda
Frontiers in Medical Technology
medical devices
medical innovation
medical devices regulations
clinical evaluation
medical device standards
regulatory pathway
title Systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in Uganda
title_full Systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in Uganda
title_fullStr Systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in Uganda
title_short Systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in Uganda
title_sort systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in uganda
topic medical devices
medical innovation
medical devices regulations
clinical evaluation
medical device standards
regulatory pathway
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmedt.2022.1054120/full
work_keys_str_mv AT charlesnormanmpaata systemsandprocessesforregulationofinvestigationalmedicaldevicesinuganda
AT brianmatovu systemsandprocessesforregulationofinvestigationalmedicaldevicesinuganda
AT mercytakuwa systemsandprocessesforregulationofinvestigationalmedicaldevicesinuganda
AT noahkiwanuka systemsandprocessesforregulationofinvestigationalmedicaldevicesinuganda
AT stefflewis systemsandprocessesforregulationofinvestigationalmedicaldevicesinuganda
AT johnnorrie systemsandprocessesforregulationofinvestigationalmedicaldevicesinuganda
AT samononge systemsandprocessesforregulationofinvestigationalmedicaldevicesinuganda
AT sharontuck systemsandprocessesforregulationofinvestigationalmedicaldevicesinuganda
AT mariawolters systemsandprocessesforregulationofinvestigationalmedicaldevicesinuganda
AT marcdemulliez systemsandprocessesforregulationofinvestigationalmedicaldevicesinuganda
AT roberttssekitoleko systemsandprocessesforregulationofinvestigationalmedicaldevicesinuganda