Outcomes during and after the use of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in a tertiary-care and a regional hospital in Switzerland

INTRODUCTION The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) has established itself in treatment of potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, when implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is not warranted. Careful patient selection for this therapy is cru...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boldizsar Kovacs, Sven Reek, Ardan M. Saguner, Nazmi Krasniqi, Urs Eriksson, Firat Duru
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW) 2019-11-01
Series:Swiss Medical Weekly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/2690
_version_ 1826995877485477888
author Boldizsar Kovacs
Sven Reek
Ardan M. Saguner
Nazmi Krasniqi
Urs Eriksson
Firat Duru
author_facet Boldizsar Kovacs
Sven Reek
Ardan M. Saguner
Nazmi Krasniqi
Urs Eriksson
Firat Duru
author_sort Boldizsar Kovacs
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) has established itself in treatment of potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, when implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is not warranted. Careful patient selection for this therapy is crucial, but unfortunately very little information from randomised controlled trials is available to guide clinical decision-making. Consequently, data from real-world patient registries play a more important role in this context. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective observational study was conducted at the University Hospital of Zurich and the GZO Regional Healthcare Centre in Wetzikon. Clinical databases were screened for patients with a history of WCD use from the time of its approval in Switzerland in July 2014 until February 2018. Baseline characteristics, WCD data and outcome data, with an emphasis on ICD implantation and ICD therapies, were collected and analysed. RESULTS Two-hundred and seven patients were included in the primary analysis. Eighty-six percent were male and the mean age was 58 ± 13 years. The underlying heart disease was ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and congenital/inherited heart diseases in 60, 35 and 5%, respectively. The most common indication for WCD use was heart failure with an ejection fraction (EF) <35% due to ICM or NICM (43 and 27%, respectively). Three of the 207 patients received an appropriate shock over a median WCD wear-time of 62 days (interquartile range [IQR] 35–95). No inappropriate shocks were registered. Median average daily wear-time was 22.6 hours (IQR 19.9–23.2) and was significantly shorter for patients for whom WCD discontinuation was due to comfort issues (17 patients, p = 0.003). After the end of WCD therapy, 48% were implanted with an ICD. In those receiving an ICD, the rate of appropriate ICD therapies (either shock or antitachycardia pacing) was 8% during a median follow-up of 110 days (IQR 23–421). CONCLUSION The WCD is safe and effective in terminating malignant ventricular arrhythmias. A substantial subgroup of patients, however, discontinued WCD use prematurely because of comfort issues. This subset of patients deserves further attention in clinical practice to ensure therapy adherence.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T03:37:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-11ea4cd2cc40424f93c8d273b15a9bd1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-3997
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-18T09:39:35Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)
record_format Article
series Swiss Medical Weekly
spelling doaj.art-11ea4cd2cc40424f93c8d273b15a9bd12024-11-02T17:26:18ZengSMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)Swiss Medical Weekly1424-39972019-11-01149454610.4414/smw.2019.20136Outcomes during and after the use of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in a tertiary-care and a regional hospital in SwitzerlandBoldizsar Kovacs0Sven Reek1Ardan M. Saguner2Nazmi Krasniqi3Urs Eriksson4Firat Duru5Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Zurich, SwitzerlandRhythmologie Aarau, SwitzerlandDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, GZO - Regional Health Centre, Wetzikon, SwitzerlandDepartment of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, GZO - Regional Health Centre, Wetzikon, Switzerland; Centre for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland; Centre for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Switzerland INTRODUCTION The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) has established itself in treatment of potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, when implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is not warranted. Careful patient selection for this therapy is crucial, but unfortunately very little information from randomised controlled trials is available to guide clinical decision-making. Consequently, data from real-world patient registries play a more important role in this context. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective observational study was conducted at the University Hospital of Zurich and the GZO Regional Healthcare Centre in Wetzikon. Clinical databases were screened for patients with a history of WCD use from the time of its approval in Switzerland in July 2014 until February 2018. Baseline characteristics, WCD data and outcome data, with an emphasis on ICD implantation and ICD therapies, were collected and analysed. RESULTS Two-hundred and seven patients were included in the primary analysis. Eighty-six percent were male and the mean age was 58 ± 13 years. The underlying heart disease was ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and congenital/inherited heart diseases in 60, 35 and 5%, respectively. The most common indication for WCD use was heart failure with an ejection fraction (EF) <35% due to ICM or NICM (43 and 27%, respectively). Three of the 207 patients received an appropriate shock over a median WCD wear-time of 62 days (interquartile range [IQR] 35–95). No inappropriate shocks were registered. Median average daily wear-time was 22.6 hours (IQR 19.9–23.2) and was significantly shorter for patients for whom WCD discontinuation was due to comfort issues (17 patients, p = 0.003). After the end of WCD therapy, 48% were implanted with an ICD. In those receiving an ICD, the rate of appropriate ICD therapies (either shock or antitachycardia pacing) was 8% during a median follow-up of 110 days (IQR 23–421). CONCLUSION The WCD is safe and effective in terminating malignant ventricular arrhythmias. A substantial subgroup of patients, however, discontinued WCD use prematurely because of comfort issues. This subset of patients deserves further attention in clinical practice to ensure therapy adherence. https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/2690implantable cardioverter defibrillatorimplantation rateoutcomesubcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillatorSudden Cardiac Deathwearable cardioverter defibrillator
spellingShingle Boldizsar Kovacs
Sven Reek
Ardan M. Saguner
Nazmi Krasniqi
Urs Eriksson
Firat Duru
Outcomes during and after the use of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in a tertiary-care and a regional hospital in Switzerland
Swiss Medical Weekly
implantable cardioverter defibrillator
implantation rate
outcome
subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Sudden Cardiac Death
wearable cardioverter defibrillator
title Outcomes during and after the use of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in a tertiary-care and a regional hospital in Switzerland
title_full Outcomes during and after the use of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in a tertiary-care and a regional hospital in Switzerland
title_fullStr Outcomes during and after the use of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in a tertiary-care and a regional hospital in Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes during and after the use of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in a tertiary-care and a regional hospital in Switzerland
title_short Outcomes during and after the use of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in a tertiary-care and a regional hospital in Switzerland
title_sort outcomes during and after the use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in a tertiary care and a regional hospital in switzerland
topic implantable cardioverter defibrillator
implantation rate
outcome
subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Sudden Cardiac Death
wearable cardioverter defibrillator
url https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/2690
work_keys_str_mv AT boldizsarkovacs outcomesduringandaftertheuseofthewearablecardioverterdefibrillatorinatertiarycareandaregionalhospitalinswitzerland
AT svenreek outcomesduringandaftertheuseofthewearablecardioverterdefibrillatorinatertiarycareandaregionalhospitalinswitzerland
AT ardanmsaguner outcomesduringandaftertheuseofthewearablecardioverterdefibrillatorinatertiarycareandaregionalhospitalinswitzerland
AT nazmikrasniqi outcomesduringandaftertheuseofthewearablecardioverterdefibrillatorinatertiarycareandaregionalhospitalinswitzerland
AT urseriksson outcomesduringandaftertheuseofthewearablecardioverterdefibrillatorinatertiarycareandaregionalhospitalinswitzerland
AT firatduru outcomesduringandaftertheuseofthewearablecardioverterdefibrillatorinatertiarycareandaregionalhospitalinswitzerland