From division to dialogue and beyond: the quest for eastern and oriental orthodox unity
The modern quest for unity of the Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox churches goes back to the mid-20th century, beginning with informal consultations in the 1960s and continuing with the work of the Joint Commission for Theological Dialogue in the 1980s onward. This has led to a paradoxical sit...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Silicea-Poligraf LLC
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Российский журнал истории Церкви |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://churchhistory.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/109 |
| _version_ | 1797881951978258432 |
|---|---|
| author | John H. Erickson |
| author_facet | John H. Erickson |
| author_sort | John H. Erickson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The modern quest for unity of the Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox churches goes back to the mid-20th century, beginning with informal consultations in the 1960s and continuing with the work of the Joint Commission for Theological Dialogue in the 1980s onward. This has led to a paradoxical situation. The Christological issues that prompted the division of the churches in the 5th century appear to have been resolved, yet the division continues. Why? This article begins by exploring the specific context of our current quest for unity: the modern ecumenical movement and modern historical scholarship. Then, after surveying pre-modern quests for unity, the article explores some of the ways in which liturgical and disciplinary differences came to be invested with new meaning, becoming symbols of division rather than expressions of legitimate diversity. We may now have reached a point where such differences no longer are taken automatically as signs of Christological disagreement, yet the impulse towards reunion of the churches appears to have slowed in recent decades. New questions have arisen. Who has the authority to lift anathemas which the churches hurled against each other in the past? What is the meaning and authority of an "ecumenical council"? How will the results of dialogue be received and effectively implemented in church life? The basic question now is whether we really desire unity more than the disunity of the status quo. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T03:27:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-11f981709b7e4c1a9aaf554c6199e784 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2686-973X 2687-069X |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T03:27:14Z |
| publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
| publisher | Silicea-Poligraf LLC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Российский журнал истории Церкви |
| spelling | doaj.art-11f981709b7e4c1a9aaf554c6199e7842023-03-13T07:25:50ZrusSilicea-Poligraf LLCРоссийский журнал истории Церкви2686-973X2687-069X2022-11-0133183110.15829/2686-973X-2022-10999From division to dialogue and beyond: the quest for eastern and oriental orthodox unityJohn H. EricksonThe modern quest for unity of the Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox churches goes back to the mid-20th century, beginning with informal consultations in the 1960s and continuing with the work of the Joint Commission for Theological Dialogue in the 1980s onward. This has led to a paradoxical situation. The Christological issues that prompted the division of the churches in the 5th century appear to have been resolved, yet the division continues. Why? This article begins by exploring the specific context of our current quest for unity: the modern ecumenical movement and modern historical scholarship. Then, after surveying pre-modern quests for unity, the article explores some of the ways in which liturgical and disciplinary differences came to be invested with new meaning, becoming symbols of division rather than expressions of legitimate diversity. We may now have reached a point where such differences no longer are taken automatically as signs of Christological disagreement, yet the impulse towards reunion of the churches appears to have slowed in recent decades. New questions have arisen. Who has the authority to lift anathemas which the churches hurled against each other in the past? What is the meaning and authority of an "ecumenical council"? How will the results of dialogue be received and effectively implemented in church life? The basic question now is whether we really desire unity more than the disunity of the status quo.https://churchhistory.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/109халкидонский соборэкуменическое движениекирилл александрийскийимператор юстиниан iсевир антиохийскийевлогий александрийскийикономияопреснокитрисвятоенерсес милостивыйанафемывселенские соборы"диаспора" |
| spellingShingle | John H. Erickson From division to dialogue and beyond: the quest for eastern and oriental orthodox unity Российский журнал истории Церкви халкидонский собор экуменическое движение кирилл александрийский император юстиниан i севир антиохийский евлогий александрийский икономия опресноки трисвятое нерсес милостивый анафемы вселенские соборы "диаспора" |
| title | From division to dialogue and beyond: the quest for eastern and oriental orthodox unity |
| title_full | From division to dialogue and beyond: the quest for eastern and oriental orthodox unity |
| title_fullStr | From division to dialogue and beyond: the quest for eastern and oriental orthodox unity |
| title_full_unstemmed | From division to dialogue and beyond: the quest for eastern and oriental orthodox unity |
| title_short | From division to dialogue and beyond: the quest for eastern and oriental orthodox unity |
| title_sort | from division to dialogue and beyond the quest for eastern and oriental orthodox unity |
| topic | халкидонский собор экуменическое движение кирилл александрийский император юстиниан i севир антиохийский евлогий александрийский икономия опресноки трисвятое нерсес милостивый анафемы вселенские соборы "диаспора" |
| url | https://churchhistory.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/109 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT johnherickson fromdivisiontodialogueandbeyondthequestforeasternandorientalorthodoxunity |