Root canal anatomy of maxillary first molars in a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography

Objective: This study aimed to assess canal morphology of maxillary first molars by analyzing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.Methods: A total of 324 maxillary first molars were collected from the Turkish population and scanned using the in vitro CBCT method. The number of roots and cana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ömer Demirtaş, Şuayip Duman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_23519_b359d9d797787f61b81fecb991c7907f.pdf
_version_ 1797360914498846720
author Ömer Demirtaş
Şuayip Duman
author_facet Ömer Demirtaş
Şuayip Duman
author_sort Ömer Demirtaş
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This study aimed to assess canal morphology of maxillary first molars by analyzing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.Methods: A total of 324 maxillary first molars were collected from the Turkish population and scanned using the in vitro CBCT method. The number of roots and canals, root canal configuration, canal shape, the presence of a C-shaped canal, apical delta, and lateral canal, as well as the distance between radiographic and anatomic apices were examined.Results: The majority of the samples (97.9%) had 3 separate roots; while the remaining teeth had two or four roots (1.5% and 0.6% respectively). CBCT results showed 2, 3, 4, and 5 root canals in 0.3%, 47.9%, 50.3% and 1.5% of the teeth, respectively. All distobuccal (DB) and palatal (P) roots had one canal. The mesiobuccal (MB) roots frequently showed a second mesiobuccal canal (MB2). The most common canal morphology in the MB roots was type I (33.1%), followed by type II and type III (29.0% and 9.8%, respectively). The P and DB roots commonly showed a type I canal configuration. C-shaped canals were rare. The mean distances between radiographic and anatomic apices in MB, DB, and P roots were 0.77 ± 0.45, 1.68 ± 0.9 and 0.91 ± 0.46 mm, respectively.Conclusions: The MB roots of maxillary first molars showed greater variations in their canal anatomy than other roots. These anatomical differences, potentially attributable to ethnic variations, should be considered when performing surgical or nonsurgical root canal treatments on maxillary molars.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T15:46:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-12125b1f38bd4d88a4634337415d8970
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-4150
2252-0317
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T15:46:26Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques
spelling doaj.art-12125b1f38bd4d88a4634337415d89702024-01-09T10:12:50ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Materials and Techniques2322-41502252-03172023-12-0112416817410.22038/jdmt.2023.70840.155723519Root canal anatomy of maxillary first molars in a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomographyÖmer Demirtaş0Şuayip Duman1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Bingol University, Bingol, Turkey.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.Objective: This study aimed to assess canal morphology of maxillary first molars by analyzing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.Methods: A total of 324 maxillary first molars were collected from the Turkish population and scanned using the in vitro CBCT method. The number of roots and canals, root canal configuration, canal shape, the presence of a C-shaped canal, apical delta, and lateral canal, as well as the distance between radiographic and anatomic apices were examined.Results: The majority of the samples (97.9%) had 3 separate roots; while the remaining teeth had two or four roots (1.5% and 0.6% respectively). CBCT results showed 2, 3, 4, and 5 root canals in 0.3%, 47.9%, 50.3% and 1.5% of the teeth, respectively. All distobuccal (DB) and palatal (P) roots had one canal. The mesiobuccal (MB) roots frequently showed a second mesiobuccal canal (MB2). The most common canal morphology in the MB roots was type I (33.1%), followed by type II and type III (29.0% and 9.8%, respectively). The P and DB roots commonly showed a type I canal configuration. C-shaped canals were rare. The mean distances between radiographic and anatomic apices in MB, DB, and P roots were 0.77 ± 0.45, 1.68 ± 0.9 and 0.91 ± 0.46 mm, respectively.Conclusions: The MB roots of maxillary first molars showed greater variations in their canal anatomy than other roots. These anatomical differences, potentially attributable to ethnic variations, should be considered when performing surgical or nonsurgical root canal treatments on maxillary molars.https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_23519_b359d9d797787f61b81fecb991c7907f.pdfcone beam computed tomographyendodonticlateral canalmaxillary molarroot canaltooth root
spellingShingle Ömer Demirtaş
Şuayip Duman
Root canal anatomy of maxillary first molars in a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography
Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques
cone beam computed tomography
endodontic
lateral canal
maxillary molar
root canal
tooth root
title Root canal anatomy of maxillary first molars in a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography
title_full Root canal anatomy of maxillary first molars in a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography
title_fullStr Root canal anatomy of maxillary first molars in a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Root canal anatomy of maxillary first molars in a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography
title_short Root canal anatomy of maxillary first molars in a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography
title_sort root canal anatomy of maxillary first molars in a turkish population using cone beam computed tomography
topic cone beam computed tomography
endodontic
lateral canal
maxillary molar
root canal
tooth root
url https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_23519_b359d9d797787f61b81fecb991c7907f.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT omerdemirtas rootcanalanatomyofmaxillaryfirstmolarsinaturkishpopulationusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT suayipduman rootcanalanatomyofmaxillaryfirstmolarsinaturkishpopulationusingconebeamcomputedtomography