Statement on diversity of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in Apulia

Abstract This opinion addresses a request from the European Commission to evaluate whether heterogeneous populations of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca have been found in Apulia (Italy) in addition to the strain named CoDiRO. After reviewing the most recent scientific literature and conducting furth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-08-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4542
_version_ 1818722779317403648
author EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
author_facet EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
author_sort EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This opinion addresses a request from the European Commission to evaluate whether heterogeneous populations of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca have been found in Apulia (Italy) in addition to the strain named CoDiRO. After reviewing the most recent scientific literature and conducting further sequence analysis of the housekeeping genes used to genotype X. fastidiosa from Apulia, the EFSA Panel on Plant Health concluded that the currently available scientific evidence does not support the notion of the existence of heterogeneous populations of X. fastidiosa in Apulia. To reach this conclusion, several lines of arguments have been considered: (i) the currently accepted multilocus sequence analysis (MLST) approach provides a robust and sensitive framework to estimate X. fastidiosa diversity, which may be further improved by whole genome sequence analysis; (ii) all scientific papers evaluated on X. fastidiosa in Apulia come to the conclusion that – notwithstanding host and location – X. fastidiosa in Apulia is ST53; and (iii) a single article by Elbaino et al. (2014) provides contradictory statements. After assessment of the methodology and re‐analysis of the sequence information underlying the conflicting statement, the Panel considered that the data presented in that article do not support firm conclusions on the existing diversity of isolates. The Panel further considered that MLST data are currently available for only 18 Apulian isolates, and thus more data are needed to study further X. fastidiosa diversity, strain evolution and route(s) of introduction. From all evidence currently available, the Panel concludes that X. fastidiosa isolates involved in the current epidemic in Apulia belong to a single sequence type, ST53. There is no other information at this moment supporting the notion that, in addition to the strain named CoDiRO, other diversity exists.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T21:00:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1226c21db722414dbafa5ac713146255
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1831-4732
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T21:00:03Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj.art-1226c21db722414dbafa5ac7131462552022-12-21T21:32:44ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322016-08-01148n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4542Statement on diversity of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in ApuliaEFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)Abstract This opinion addresses a request from the European Commission to evaluate whether heterogeneous populations of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca have been found in Apulia (Italy) in addition to the strain named CoDiRO. After reviewing the most recent scientific literature and conducting further sequence analysis of the housekeeping genes used to genotype X. fastidiosa from Apulia, the EFSA Panel on Plant Health concluded that the currently available scientific evidence does not support the notion of the existence of heterogeneous populations of X. fastidiosa in Apulia. To reach this conclusion, several lines of arguments have been considered: (i) the currently accepted multilocus sequence analysis (MLST) approach provides a robust and sensitive framework to estimate X. fastidiosa diversity, which may be further improved by whole genome sequence analysis; (ii) all scientific papers evaluated on X. fastidiosa in Apulia come to the conclusion that – notwithstanding host and location – X. fastidiosa in Apulia is ST53; and (iii) a single article by Elbaino et al. (2014) provides contradictory statements. After assessment of the methodology and re‐analysis of the sequence information underlying the conflicting statement, the Panel considered that the data presented in that article do not support firm conclusions on the existing diversity of isolates. The Panel further considered that MLST data are currently available for only 18 Apulian isolates, and thus more data are needed to study further X. fastidiosa diversity, strain evolution and route(s) of introduction. From all evidence currently available, the Panel concludes that X. fastidiosa isolates involved in the current epidemic in Apulia belong to a single sequence type, ST53. There is no other information at this moment supporting the notion that, in addition to the strain named CoDiRO, other diversity exists.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4542CoDiRO strainhousekeeping genesisolatesMLSAMLSTolive disease
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
Statement on diversity of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in Apulia
EFSA Journal
CoDiRO strain
housekeeping genes
isolates
MLSA
MLST
olive disease
title Statement on diversity of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in Apulia
title_full Statement on diversity of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in Apulia
title_fullStr Statement on diversity of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in Apulia
title_full_unstemmed Statement on diversity of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in Apulia
title_short Statement on diversity of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in Apulia
title_sort statement on diversity of xylella fastidiosa subsp pauca in apulia
topic CoDiRO strain
housekeeping genes
isolates
MLSA
MLST
olive disease
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4542
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonplanthealthplh statementondiversityofxylellafastidiosasubsppaucainapulia