Quantifying vegetation indices using terrestrial laser scanning: methodological complexities and ecological insights from a Mediterranean forest

<p>Accurate measurement of vegetation density metrics including plant, wood and leaf area indices (PAI, WAI and LAI) is key to monitoring and modelling carbon storage and uptake in forests. Traditional passive sensor approaches, such as digital hemispherical photography (DHP), cannot separate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: W. R. M. Flynn, H. J. F. Owen, S. W. D. Grieve, E. R. Lines
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2023-07-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2769/2023/bg-20-2769-2023.pdf
_version_ 1797780508880404480
author W. R. M. Flynn
H. J. F. Owen
S. W. D. Grieve
S. W. D. Grieve
E. R. Lines
author_facet W. R. M. Flynn
H. J. F. Owen
S. W. D. Grieve
S. W. D. Grieve
E. R. Lines
author_sort W. R. M. Flynn
collection DOAJ
description <p>Accurate measurement of vegetation density metrics including plant, wood and leaf area indices (PAI, WAI and LAI) is key to monitoring and modelling carbon storage and uptake in forests. Traditional passive sensor approaches, such as digital hemispherical photography (DHP), cannot separate leaf and wood material, nor individual trees, and require many assumptions in processing. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data offer new opportunities to improve understanding of tree and canopy structure. Multiple methods have been developed to derive PAI and LAI from TLS data, but there is little consensus on the best approach, nor are methods benchmarked as standard.</p> <p>Using TLS data collected in 33 plots containing 2472 trees of 5 species in Mediterranean forests, we compare three TLS methods (<i>lidar pulse</i>, <i>2D intensity image</i> and <i>voxel-based</i>) to derive PAI and compare with co-located DHP. We then separate leaf and wood in individual tree point clouds to calculate the ratio of wood to total plant area (<span class="inline-formula"><i>α</i></span>), a metric to correct for non-photosynthetic material in LAI estimates. We use individual tree TLS point clouds to estimate how <span class="inline-formula"><i>α</i></span> varies with species, tree height and stand density.</p> <p>We find the lidar pulse method agrees most closely with DHP, but it is limited to single-scan data, so it cannot determine individual tree properties, including <span class="inline-formula"><i>α</i></span>. The voxel-based method shows promise for ecological studies as it can be applied to individual tree point clouds. Using the voxel-based method, we show that species explain some variation in <span class="inline-formula"><i>α</i></span>; however, height and plot density were better predictors.</p> <p>Our findings highlight the value of TLS data to improve fundamental understanding of tree form and function as well as the importance of rigorous testing of TLS data processing methods at a time when new approaches are being rapidly developed. New algorithms need to be compared against traditional methods and existing algorithms, using common reference data. Whilst promising, our results show that metrics derived from TLS data are not yet reliably calibrated and validated to the extent they are ready to replace traditional approaches for large-scale monitoring of PAI and LAI.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-12T23:45:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-122e6fd8218043c6a2e4ecda65cb0300
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T23:45:07Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Biogeosciences
spelling doaj.art-122e6fd8218043c6a2e4ecda65cb03002023-07-14T08:42:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892023-07-01202769278410.5194/bg-20-2769-2023Quantifying vegetation indices using terrestrial laser scanning: methodological complexities and ecological insights from a Mediterranean forestW. R. M. Flynn0H. J. F. Owen1S. W. D. Grieve2S. W. D. Grieve3E. R. Lines4School of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Rd, Bethnal Green, London, E1 4NS, United KingdomDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge, CB2 3EN, United KingdomSchool of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Rd, Bethnal Green, London, E1 4NS, United KingdomDigital Environment Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, New Road, London, E1 1HH, United KingdomDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge, CB2 3EN, United Kingdom<p>Accurate measurement of vegetation density metrics including plant, wood and leaf area indices (PAI, WAI and LAI) is key to monitoring and modelling carbon storage and uptake in forests. Traditional passive sensor approaches, such as digital hemispherical photography (DHP), cannot separate leaf and wood material, nor individual trees, and require many assumptions in processing. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data offer new opportunities to improve understanding of tree and canopy structure. Multiple methods have been developed to derive PAI and LAI from TLS data, but there is little consensus on the best approach, nor are methods benchmarked as standard.</p> <p>Using TLS data collected in 33 plots containing 2472 trees of 5 species in Mediterranean forests, we compare three TLS methods (<i>lidar pulse</i>, <i>2D intensity image</i> and <i>voxel-based</i>) to derive PAI and compare with co-located DHP. We then separate leaf and wood in individual tree point clouds to calculate the ratio of wood to total plant area (<span class="inline-formula"><i>α</i></span>), a metric to correct for non-photosynthetic material in LAI estimates. We use individual tree TLS point clouds to estimate how <span class="inline-formula"><i>α</i></span> varies with species, tree height and stand density.</p> <p>We find the lidar pulse method agrees most closely with DHP, but it is limited to single-scan data, so it cannot determine individual tree properties, including <span class="inline-formula"><i>α</i></span>. The voxel-based method shows promise for ecological studies as it can be applied to individual tree point clouds. Using the voxel-based method, we show that species explain some variation in <span class="inline-formula"><i>α</i></span>; however, height and plot density were better predictors.</p> <p>Our findings highlight the value of TLS data to improve fundamental understanding of tree form and function as well as the importance of rigorous testing of TLS data processing methods at a time when new approaches are being rapidly developed. New algorithms need to be compared against traditional methods and existing algorithms, using common reference data. Whilst promising, our results show that metrics derived from TLS data are not yet reliably calibrated and validated to the extent they are ready to replace traditional approaches for large-scale monitoring of PAI and LAI.</p>https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2769/2023/bg-20-2769-2023.pdf
spellingShingle W. R. M. Flynn
H. J. F. Owen
S. W. D. Grieve
S. W. D. Grieve
E. R. Lines
Quantifying vegetation indices using terrestrial laser scanning: methodological complexities and ecological insights from a Mediterranean forest
Biogeosciences
title Quantifying vegetation indices using terrestrial laser scanning: methodological complexities and ecological insights from a Mediterranean forest
title_full Quantifying vegetation indices using terrestrial laser scanning: methodological complexities and ecological insights from a Mediterranean forest
title_fullStr Quantifying vegetation indices using terrestrial laser scanning: methodological complexities and ecological insights from a Mediterranean forest
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying vegetation indices using terrestrial laser scanning: methodological complexities and ecological insights from a Mediterranean forest
title_short Quantifying vegetation indices using terrestrial laser scanning: methodological complexities and ecological insights from a Mediterranean forest
title_sort quantifying vegetation indices using terrestrial laser scanning methodological complexities and ecological insights from a mediterranean forest
url https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2769/2023/bg-20-2769-2023.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT wrmflynn quantifyingvegetationindicesusingterrestriallaserscanningmethodologicalcomplexitiesandecologicalinsightsfromamediterraneanforest
AT hjfowen quantifyingvegetationindicesusingterrestriallaserscanningmethodologicalcomplexitiesandecologicalinsightsfromamediterraneanforest
AT swdgrieve quantifyingvegetationindicesusingterrestriallaserscanningmethodologicalcomplexitiesandecologicalinsightsfromamediterraneanforest
AT swdgrieve quantifyingvegetationindicesusingterrestriallaserscanningmethodologicalcomplexitiesandecologicalinsightsfromamediterraneanforest
AT erlines quantifyingvegetationindicesusingterrestriallaserscanningmethodologicalcomplexitiesandecologicalinsightsfromamediterraneanforest