Key informant views on potential acceptability and feasibility of long-acting antiretroviral treatment for HIV in Kenya

Abstract Background In 2020, 14% of diagnosed persons living with HIV (PLWH) in Kenya were not taking antiretroviral therapy (ART), and 19% of those on ART had unsuppressed viral loads. Long-acting antiretroviral therapy (LA-ART) may increase viral suppression by promoting ART uptake and adherence....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Kaggiah, Catherine N. Maina, John Kinuthia, Douglas Barthold, Brett Hauber, Jacinda Tran, Jane M. Simoni, Susan M. Graham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-04-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09309-w
_version_ 1797199589227364352
author Anne Kaggiah
Catherine N. Maina
John Kinuthia
Douglas Barthold
Brett Hauber
Jacinda Tran
Jane M. Simoni
Susan M. Graham
author_facet Anne Kaggiah
Catherine N. Maina
John Kinuthia
Douglas Barthold
Brett Hauber
Jacinda Tran
Jane M. Simoni
Susan M. Graham
author_sort Anne Kaggiah
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In 2020, 14% of diagnosed persons living with HIV (PLWH) in Kenya were not taking antiretroviral therapy (ART), and 19% of those on ART had unsuppressed viral loads. Long-acting antiretroviral therapy (LA-ART) may increase viral suppression by promoting ART uptake and adherence. We conducted key informant (KI) interviews with HIV experts in Kenya to identify product and delivery attributes related to the acceptability and feasibility of providing LA-ART to PLWH in Kenya. Methods Interviews were conducted via Zoom on potential LA-ART options including intra-muscular (IM) injections, subcutaneous (SC) injections, implants, and LA oral pills. KI were asked to discuss the products they were most and least excited about, as well as barriers and facilitators to LA-ART roll-out. In addition, they were asked about potential delivery locations for LA-ART products such as homes, pharmacies, and clinics. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and data were analyzed using a combination of inductive and deductive coding. Results Twelve KI (5 women, 7 men) participated between December 2021 and February 2022. Overall, participants reported that LA-ART would be acceptable and preferable to PLWH because of fatigue with daily oral pills. They viewed IM injections and LA oral pills as the most exciting options to ease pill burden and improve adherence. KI felt that populations who could benefit most were adolescents in boarding schools and stigmatized populations such as sex workers. SC injections and implants were less favored, as they would require new training initiatives for patients or healthcare workers on administration. In addition, SC injections would require refrigeration and needle disposal after use. Some KI thought patients, especially men, might worry that IM injections and implants would impact fertility, given their role in family planning. Pharmacies were perceived by most KI as suboptimal delivery locations; however, given ongoing work in Kenya to include pharmacies in antiretroviral delivery, they recommended asking patients their views. Conclusion There is interest and support for LA-ART in Kenya, especially IM injections and LA oral pills. Identifying patient preferences for modes and delivery locations and addressing misconceptions about specific products as they become available will be important before wide-scale implementation.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T07:18:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1232d9faad2b48a6973b3060a2b283ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2334
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T07:18:09Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj.art-1232d9faad2b48a6973b3060a2b283ff2024-04-21T11:10:24ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342024-04-0124111210.1186/s12879-024-09309-wKey informant views on potential acceptability and feasibility of long-acting antiretroviral treatment for HIV in KenyaAnne Kaggiah0Catherine N. Maina1John Kinuthia2Douglas Barthold3Brett Hauber4Jacinda Tran5Jane M. Simoni6Susan M. Graham7Research and Programs Department, Kenyatta National HospitalResearch and Programs Department, Kenyatta National HospitalResearch and Programs Department, Kenyatta National HospitalThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of WashingtonThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of WashingtonThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of WashingtonOffice of Behavioral and Social Sciences ResearchDepartment of Global Health, University of WashingtonAbstract Background In 2020, 14% of diagnosed persons living with HIV (PLWH) in Kenya were not taking antiretroviral therapy (ART), and 19% of those on ART had unsuppressed viral loads. Long-acting antiretroviral therapy (LA-ART) may increase viral suppression by promoting ART uptake and adherence. We conducted key informant (KI) interviews with HIV experts in Kenya to identify product and delivery attributes related to the acceptability and feasibility of providing LA-ART to PLWH in Kenya. Methods Interviews were conducted via Zoom on potential LA-ART options including intra-muscular (IM) injections, subcutaneous (SC) injections, implants, and LA oral pills. KI were asked to discuss the products they were most and least excited about, as well as barriers and facilitators to LA-ART roll-out. In addition, they were asked about potential delivery locations for LA-ART products such as homes, pharmacies, and clinics. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and data were analyzed using a combination of inductive and deductive coding. Results Twelve KI (5 women, 7 men) participated between December 2021 and February 2022. Overall, participants reported that LA-ART would be acceptable and preferable to PLWH because of fatigue with daily oral pills. They viewed IM injections and LA oral pills as the most exciting options to ease pill burden and improve adherence. KI felt that populations who could benefit most were adolescents in boarding schools and stigmatized populations such as sex workers. SC injections and implants were less favored, as they would require new training initiatives for patients or healthcare workers on administration. In addition, SC injections would require refrigeration and needle disposal after use. Some KI thought patients, especially men, might worry that IM injections and implants would impact fertility, given their role in family planning. Pharmacies were perceived by most KI as suboptimal delivery locations; however, given ongoing work in Kenya to include pharmacies in antiretroviral delivery, they recommended asking patients their views. Conclusion There is interest and support for LA-ART in Kenya, especially IM injections and LA oral pills. Identifying patient preferences for modes and delivery locations and addressing misconceptions about specific products as they become available will be important before wide-scale implementation.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09309-wHIVLong-acting antiretroviralAcceptabilityFeasibilityKenya
spellingShingle Anne Kaggiah
Catherine N. Maina
John Kinuthia
Douglas Barthold
Brett Hauber
Jacinda Tran
Jane M. Simoni
Susan M. Graham
Key informant views on potential acceptability and feasibility of long-acting antiretroviral treatment for HIV in Kenya
BMC Infectious Diseases
HIV
Long-acting antiretroviral
Acceptability
Feasibility
Kenya
title Key informant views on potential acceptability and feasibility of long-acting antiretroviral treatment for HIV in Kenya
title_full Key informant views on potential acceptability and feasibility of long-acting antiretroviral treatment for HIV in Kenya
title_fullStr Key informant views on potential acceptability and feasibility of long-acting antiretroviral treatment for HIV in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Key informant views on potential acceptability and feasibility of long-acting antiretroviral treatment for HIV in Kenya
title_short Key informant views on potential acceptability and feasibility of long-acting antiretroviral treatment for HIV in Kenya
title_sort key informant views on potential acceptability and feasibility of long acting antiretroviral treatment for hiv in kenya
topic HIV
Long-acting antiretroviral
Acceptability
Feasibility
Kenya
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09309-w
work_keys_str_mv AT annekaggiah keyinformantviewsonpotentialacceptabilityandfeasibilityoflongactingantiretroviraltreatmentforhivinkenya
AT catherinenmaina keyinformantviewsonpotentialacceptabilityandfeasibilityoflongactingantiretroviraltreatmentforhivinkenya
AT johnkinuthia keyinformantviewsonpotentialacceptabilityandfeasibilityoflongactingantiretroviraltreatmentforhivinkenya
AT douglasbarthold keyinformantviewsonpotentialacceptabilityandfeasibilityoflongactingantiretroviraltreatmentforhivinkenya
AT bretthauber keyinformantviewsonpotentialacceptabilityandfeasibilityoflongactingantiretroviraltreatmentforhivinkenya
AT jacindatran keyinformantviewsonpotentialacceptabilityandfeasibilityoflongactingantiretroviraltreatmentforhivinkenya
AT janemsimoni keyinformantviewsonpotentialacceptabilityandfeasibilityoflongactingantiretroviraltreatmentforhivinkenya
AT susanmgraham keyinformantviewsonpotentialacceptabilityandfeasibilityoflongactingantiretroviraltreatmentforhivinkenya