Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Infertility—Infusion versus Injectable PRP

(1) Background: During IVF (in vitro fertilization) procedures, endometrial thickness has a significant role in the success of pregnancy outcomes for embryo transfers. Endometrial thickness, a crucial component of endometrial receptivity, is a contentious issue. The regenerative properties of PRP ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ioana Alexandra Zaha, Anca Huniadi, Florin Bodog, Luana Seles, Mihaela Cristina Toma, Laura Maghiar, Erika Szulay-Bimbo, Alin Bodog, Liliana Sachelarie, Mihai Florea, Liana Stefan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/12/1676
_version_ 1797380387100426240
author Ioana Alexandra Zaha
Anca Huniadi
Florin Bodog
Luana Seles
Mihaela Cristina Toma
Laura Maghiar
Erika Szulay-Bimbo
Alin Bodog
Liliana Sachelarie
Mihai Florea
Liana Stefan
author_facet Ioana Alexandra Zaha
Anca Huniadi
Florin Bodog
Luana Seles
Mihaela Cristina Toma
Laura Maghiar
Erika Szulay-Bimbo
Alin Bodog
Liliana Sachelarie
Mihai Florea
Liana Stefan
author_sort Ioana Alexandra Zaha
collection DOAJ
description (1) Background: During IVF (in vitro fertilization) procedures, endometrial thickness has a significant role in the success of pregnancy outcomes for embryo transfers. Endometrial thickness, a crucial component of endometrial receptivity, is a contentious issue. The regenerative properties of PRP have been shown in recent research to have positive effects on the endometrium. PRP increases the pregnancy rate in IVF patients with thin endometrium and recurrent implantation failure. In order to demonstrate the efficacy of PRP therapies, this work compares the administration of injectable and infusible PRP during endometrial preparation. (2) Methods: This prospective single-arm control study was conducted at an IVF center in Oradea, Romania. This study included 50 patients; 27 were included in the group with Injectable PRP and 23 in the group with Infusible PRP. The outcome was compared between the two groups, with the primary outcome being the endometrial thickness after the PRP infusion or injection and the secondary outcome being the pregnancy rate in both groups. (3) Results: Patients who were treated with Injectable PRP had a higher pregnancy rate. An improvement in the quality of the endometrium, in terms of thickness, was also observed in the patients who were injected with PRP. (4) Conclusions: Compared to PRP infusions inside the uterus, sub-endometrial PRP injections in frozen embryo transfer methods have a greater pregnancy rate.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:36:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-123576dd4668438789a64c1f2dd92697
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4426
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:36:29Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
spelling doaj.art-123576dd4668438789a64c1f2dd926972023-12-22T14:19:55ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262023-11-011312167610.3390/jpm13121676Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Infertility—Infusion versus Injectable PRPIoana Alexandra Zaha0Anca Huniadi1Florin Bodog2Luana Seles3Mihaela Cristina Toma4Laura Maghiar5Erika Szulay-Bimbo6Alin Bodog7Liliana Sachelarie8Mihai Florea9Liana Stefan10Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1st December Square 10, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1st December Square 10, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1st December Square 10, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1st December Square 10, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1st December Square 10, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1st December Square 10, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1st December Square 10, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1st December Square 10, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaDepartment of Prelinical Discipline, Apollonia University, 700511 Iasi, RomaniaA Calla—Infertility Diagnostic and Treatment Center, Constantin A. Rosetti Street, 410103 Oradea, RomaniaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1st December Square 10, 410073 Oradea, Romania(1) Background: During IVF (in vitro fertilization) procedures, endometrial thickness has a significant role in the success of pregnancy outcomes for embryo transfers. Endometrial thickness, a crucial component of endometrial receptivity, is a contentious issue. The regenerative properties of PRP have been shown in recent research to have positive effects on the endometrium. PRP increases the pregnancy rate in IVF patients with thin endometrium and recurrent implantation failure. In order to demonstrate the efficacy of PRP therapies, this work compares the administration of injectable and infusible PRP during endometrial preparation. (2) Methods: This prospective single-arm control study was conducted at an IVF center in Oradea, Romania. This study included 50 patients; 27 were included in the group with Injectable PRP and 23 in the group with Infusible PRP. The outcome was compared between the two groups, with the primary outcome being the endometrial thickness after the PRP infusion or injection and the secondary outcome being the pregnancy rate in both groups. (3) Results: Patients who were treated with Injectable PRP had a higher pregnancy rate. An improvement in the quality of the endometrium, in terms of thickness, was also observed in the patients who were injected with PRP. (4) Conclusions: Compared to PRP infusions inside the uterus, sub-endometrial PRP injections in frozen embryo transfer methods have a greater pregnancy rate.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/12/1676thin endometriumPRPfrozen embryo transferendometrial thicknessIVF
spellingShingle Ioana Alexandra Zaha
Anca Huniadi
Florin Bodog
Luana Seles
Mihaela Cristina Toma
Laura Maghiar
Erika Szulay-Bimbo
Alin Bodog
Liliana Sachelarie
Mihai Florea
Liana Stefan
Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Infertility—Infusion versus Injectable PRP
Journal of Personalized Medicine
thin endometrium
PRP
frozen embryo transfer
endometrial thickness
IVF
title Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Infertility—Infusion versus Injectable PRP
title_full Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Infertility—Infusion versus Injectable PRP
title_fullStr Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Infertility—Infusion versus Injectable PRP
title_full_unstemmed Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Infertility—Infusion versus Injectable PRP
title_short Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Infertility—Infusion versus Injectable PRP
title_sort autologous platelet rich plasma prp in infertility infusion versus injectable prp
topic thin endometrium
PRP
frozen embryo transfer
endometrial thickness
IVF
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/12/1676
work_keys_str_mv AT ioanaalexandrazaha autologousplateletrichplasmaprpininfertilityinfusionversusinjectableprp
AT ancahuniadi autologousplateletrichplasmaprpininfertilityinfusionversusinjectableprp
AT florinbodog autologousplateletrichplasmaprpininfertilityinfusionversusinjectableprp
AT luanaseles autologousplateletrichplasmaprpininfertilityinfusionversusinjectableprp
AT mihaelacristinatoma autologousplateletrichplasmaprpininfertilityinfusionversusinjectableprp
AT lauramaghiar autologousplateletrichplasmaprpininfertilityinfusionversusinjectableprp
AT erikaszulaybimbo autologousplateletrichplasmaprpininfertilityinfusionversusinjectableprp
AT alinbodog autologousplateletrichplasmaprpininfertilityinfusionversusinjectableprp
AT lilianasachelarie autologousplateletrichplasmaprpininfertilityinfusionversusinjectableprp
AT mihaiflorea autologousplateletrichplasmaprpininfertilityinfusionversusinjectableprp
AT lianastefan autologousplateletrichplasmaprpininfertilityinfusionversusinjectableprp